Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program. - Wikidata - wikimedia - TriplyDB

Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program.

Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q40084524

about

Optimal breast cancer screening strategies for older women: current perspectives Measurement of breast density with digital breast tomosynthesis--a systematic review Breast cancer screening: an evidence-based update Vision 20/20: Mammographic breast density and its clinical applications The need for supplemental breast cancer screening modalities: a perspective of population-based breast cancer screening programs in Japan.Is the false-positive rate in mammography in North America too high?Intensified surveillance for early detection of breast cancer in high-risk patients Nuclear imaging of the breast: translating achievements in instrumentation into clinical use Digital breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) screening: data and implications for population screening.Factors Associated With Rates of False-Positive and False-Negative Results From Digital Mammography Screening: An Analysis of Registry Data.Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening in Women With Dense Breasts Should Be Offered With Simultaneous Collection of Outcomes Data.Position paper on screening for breast cancer by the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI) and 30 national breast radiology bodies from Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Fra Visualization of Breast Microcalcifications on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and 2-Dimensional Digital Mammography Using Specimens.Digital breast tomosynthesis changes management in patients seen at a tertiary care breast center.Agreement between Breast Percentage Density Estimations from Standard-Dose versus Synthetic Digital Mammograms: Results from a Large Screening Cohort Using Automated Measures Imaging Surveillance After Primary Breast Cancer Treatment.X-ray phase-contrast imaging of the breast--advances towards clinical implementation.Breast cancer detection in digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography-a side-by-side review of discrepant cases Pursuing optimal thresholds to recommend breast biopsy by quantifying the value of tomosynthesis.Postmortem validation of breast density using dual-energy mammography Clinical implementation of digital breast tomosynthesis.Update on new technologies in digital mammography The potential role of dedicated 3D breast CT as a diagnostic tool: review and early clinical examples Comparison of two-dimensional synthesized mammograms versus original digital mammograms alone and in combination with tomosynthesis images.Digital breast tomosynthesis: studies of the effects of acquisition geometry on contrast-to-noise ratio and observer preference of low-contrast objects in breast phantom images.Screening outcomes following implementation of digital breast tomosynthesis in a general-population screening program.Multiscale bilateral filtering for improving image quality in digital breast tomosynthesis.Impact of and interaction between the availability of prior examinations and DBT on the interpretation of negative and benign mammograms Value analysis of digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer screening in a commercially-insured US population.Molecular breast imaging: an emerging modality for breast cancer screening.Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance of clustered microcalcification detection on breast phantom images acquired with an experimental system using variable scan angles, angular increments, and number of projection views.Comparison of Sonography versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis to Locate Intramammary Marker Clips.Digital breast tomosynthesis: lessons learned from early clinical implementation.X-ray scatter correction in breast tomosynthesis with a precomputed scatter map library.Journal club: molecular breast imaging at reduced radiation dose for supplemental screening in mammographically dense breasts.Mammographic density: Comparison of visual assessment with fully automatic calculation on a multivendor dataset.Identifying women with dense breasts at high risk for interval cancer: a cohort study.Comparative effectiveness of combined digital mammography and tomosynthesis screening for women with dense breasts.Beyond the mammography debate: a moderate perspective Reliability of semiquantitative assessment of osteophytes and subchondral cysts on tomosynthesis images by radiologists with different levels of expertise

P2860

Q26764816-10F0EF74-E5EC-4815-BCEC-079A20BE5894 Q27008091-63A25DCB-CA1D-4459-8845-7854CFAFB2B0 Q28081267-669E5C96-1B46-4E77-AAA6-F5275A137D04 Q28081408-45DF0870-1526-4E28-8B39-43F6E4480F2F Q30249866-BBC5AF67-4486-4C5F-BA9D-A909E9959F3B Q30250289-A334E37B-F184-4239-A7BD-1C5D57686A54 Q30392157-65F15CE7-121A-4CAD-9359-C29560303DC3 Q30419180-7906F90A-45F3-4AD4-B925-060ACE62C442 Q30961920-5843DCAE-050F-4247-BECE-A26FC161DE53 Q31036427-21DF9CB4-3665-462F-9BC6-76BC6D03D4A5 Q31036434-900623CF-E628-4330-BACE-B518327A575B Q32186742-611ACB5B-8757-47E1-AB68-78D2FB84B671 Q33565763-D5FE8FE8-1ED4-4C63-ABB1-46F70B67A3F8 Q33711000-79A2DCFB-BBDF-436C-8726-4112DB2C2009 Q33750745-0EE9AEB4-64B7-474A-82EF-E8103F23BA32 Q33763563-027222E6-138A-44FD-9FB6-604489ED477B Q33782107-304D48F2-4F78-4DD3-B38A-3EDFA2928FCE Q33956271-7E486BAE-C7EC-4FB7-AE1F-DE7AC288A728 Q33958483-86003525-428C-41B3-99CA-07FDFF9B2435 Q33990504-3A583AF8-17BD-4C57-9E7C-9F68A33CFCF9 Q34026149-0685DC08-8300-42D1-83E7-E5E353D7B66C Q34075267-DA3288BC-2178-4CEF-806D-D3F3F1A6F96E Q34364139-67F8F4C2-31DE-469A-8E4C-089620B738E3 Q34681114-21039A90-011A-45EE-BE57-6D856AD1AAE3 Q34688699-4D3212C5-6D14-4D79-ABA9-E0AF07DA8DB2 Q34736145-8E03877D-86ED-4B10-B5FF-BB9F758220EF Q34777538-5FA933B5-D42D-4A77-9E3E-F5A0A4182CF5 Q34939196-2668476F-421E-41A0-8E8B-A17A0B772CB5 Q34977434-709885E0-52CC-4623-BC1C-642A6039BA93 Q35002382-BC873C5B-C529-4BE4-9C30-4062DE09083E Q35038970-E1E2D268-6453-438F-A4B6-3971EC3F67AD Q35054469-A38F391D-93D3-4668-9460-6F6E2838B67B Q35057025-8CCAACC5-C6B5-497C-9FE1-5BCD6A866D25 Q35110389-C1A13D77-E3EB-4DEE-A76D-E73FA7095142 Q35580579-F5047C7A-856C-4E67-88A4-B9A936DB871C Q35619641-E34E039D-937A-4234-A35D-9B8460CB3DB5 Q35646902-F4B6C5B0-2138-484E-B94F-338D1E61106F Q35683407-60A916CA-A469-4A90-9501-D404E01020A0 Q35714557-CF07365A-420A-4003-A215-C7967F668664 Q35720527-83643572-F570-4BDF-9F4B-F0463181CF38

P2860

Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q40084524

description

2013 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2013年の論文

@ja

2013年論文

@yue

2013年論文

@zh-hant

2013年論文

@zh-hk

2013年論文

@zh-mo

2013年論文

@zh-tw

2013年论文

@wuu

2013年论文

@zh

2013年论文

@zh-cn

name

Comparison of digital mammogra ...... ation-based screening program.

@en

type

label

Comparison of digital mammogra ...... ation-based screening program.

@en

prefLabel

Comparison of digital mammogra ...... ation-based screening program.

@en

P1433

Q40084524-7A7AF5CC-25C4-4112-AF64-714119AF22C6

P1476

Q40084524-F444ACE8-2DAE-403F-A6F6-028319856986

P2093

Q40084524-1EB5F271-D4CB-4841-8AF7-CABA9C1C58AB

Q40084524-1F6669DD-1A3D-4A6C-AC30-F4740005019F

Q40084524-2BF61620-1D05-475C-8E0F-1465DD2CBBBE

Q40084524-3A10AC8E-3C29-4DAF-ADF1-0BB3F9F94C24

Q40084524-3B28965E-5BD0-49E6-A762-F0A5AD668A40

Q40084524-4070ED1A-5453-41FF-8681-3654FD1D0D95

Q40084524-4A599F16-77F6-470D-972A-2BBCCB16953C

Q40084524-52248D95-B6A5-446B-A119-AFEC378AD600

Q40084524-68A58315-DC51-4A5F-AA75-782FDF7CE074

Q40084524-8DC85271-88EE-4233-A124-23FD41DF26AD

P304

Q40084524-F556FCF4-E318-481A-A35C-4C3ECE052B75

P31

Q40084524-DA110CA8-6331-409E-9188-405C48FD51B4

P356

Q40084524-29E51B6A-BD6C-4727-90E1-4A11FBFD4354

P407

Q40084524-9E858D6F-6450-4A1E-8FB8-167F06E768B2

P433

Q40084524-2ADCB436-2401-44D6-B899-0C3CCF20D73E

P478

Q40084524-85314704-340E-4579-AC57-334D072C11B8

P577

Q40084524-AFD36B19-D287-4D5F-A3D5-B58327E2D739

P5875

Q40084524-78579245-24E7-4C66-B2F7-57D09FE38E14

P698

Q40084524-89402FCF-9A9D-452C-9415-10DA2B2FDEA1

P356

RADIOL.12121373

P1433

P1476

Comparison of digital mammogra ...... ation-based screening program.

@en

P2093

Andriy I Bandos

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

David Gur

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Ellen B Eben

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Gunnar Jahr

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Ingvild N Jebsen

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Loren T Niklason

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Mina Izadi

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Mona Krager

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Per Skaane

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Randi Gullien

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P304

47-56

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1148/RADIOL.12121373

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P407

P433

1

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

267

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

2013-01-07T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

234087097

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

23297332

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string