Coronary Revascularization in Cardiogenic Shock.

about

Effects of Low-Dose Recombinant Human Brain Natriuretic Peptide on Anterior Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.An unusual case of renal calculi leading to myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock.

P2860

Q33615284-6B4FC31A-A2F5-4FF7-8DE6-E3360F546680 Q42054344-2A80DFD7-DDF8-4E14-B4DB-5F8BC4D25A8A

P2860

Coronary Revascularization in Cardiogenic Shock.

Item

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q40169143

description

2016 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2016年の論文

@ja

2016年論文

@yue

2016年論文

@zh-hant

2016年論文

@zh-hk

2016年論文

@zh-mo

2016年論文

@zh-tw

2016年论文

@wuu

2016年论文

@zh

2016年论文

@zh-cn

name

Coronary Revascularization in Cardiogenic Shock.

@en

type

Item

label

Coronary Revascularization in Cardiogenic Shock.

@en

prefLabel

Coronary Revascularization in Cardiogenic Shock.

@en

P1476

Coronary Revascularization in Cardiogenic Shock.

@en

P2093

J Dawn Abbott

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Nathan Spence

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines

Comparison of Dopamine and Norepinephrine in the Treatment of Shock

Intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation (IABP) for myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock

Early revascularization and long-term survival in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction

Use of mechanical circulatory support in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.

Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK Investigators. Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock.

Left ventricular mechanical support with Impella provides more ventricular unloading in heart failure than extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Trends in management and outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.

Comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting after acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: results from the Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock (S

The current use of Impella 2.5 in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: results from the USpella Registry

P2888

s11936-015-0423-9

P304

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1007/S11936-015-0423-9

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

2016-01-01T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P6179

1033532799

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

26706849

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P921

cardiogenic shock

revascularization

Coronary Revascularization in Cardiogenic Shock.

about

P2860

P2860

Coronary Revascularization in Cardiogenic Shock.

description

name

type

label

prefLabel

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P2888

P304

P31

P356

P433

P478

P577

P6179

P698

P921

P356

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P2888

P304

P31

P356

P433

P478

P577

P6179

P698

P921