Comparative analysis of transperineal template saturation prostate biopsy versus magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy with magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion guidance.
about
The current and future role of magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer detection and managementHistological outcomes after focal high-intensity focused ultrasound and cryotherapyActive surveillance for prostate cancer: current evidence and contemporary state of practiceIntegration of multiparametric MRI into active surveillance of prostate cancer.Single fraction multimodal image guided focal salvage high-dose-rate brachytherapy for recurrent prostate cancer.[Navigation in urological surgery: Possibilities and limits of current techniques].The detection of significant prostate cancer is correlated with the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) in MRI/transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy.Transperineal vs. transrectal biopsy in MRI targeting.The addition of a sagittal image fusion improves the prostate cancer detection in a sensor-based MRI /ultrasound fusion guided targeted biopsyTargeted transperineal biopsy of the prostate has limited additional benefit over background cores for larger MRI-identified tumors.Visually Estimated MRI Targeted Prostate Biopsy Could Improve the Detection of Significant Prostate Cancer in Patients with a PSA Level <10 ng/mL.Assessment of the Performance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy against a Combined Targeted Plus Systematic Biopsy Approach Using 24-Core Transperineal Template Saturation Mapping Prostate Biopsy.Prospective Pilot Trial to Evaluate a High Resolution Diffusion-Weighted MRI in Prostate Cancer Patients.Missing the Mark: Prostate Cancer Upgrading by Systematic Biopsy over Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy.Novel Imaging of Prostate Cancer with MRI, MRI/US, and PET.Predictive value of negative 3T multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate on 12-core biopsy results.Optimizing safety and accuracy of prostate biopsy.The Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Image-Guided Targeted Biopsy Versus Standard Template Saturation Biopsy in the Detection of Prostate Cancer.Improving the evaluation and diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in 2017.Multicentre evaluation of targeted and systematic biopsies using magnetic resonance and ultrasound image-fusion guided transperineal prostate biopsy in patients with a previous negative biopsy.First report of robot-assisted transperineal fusion versus off-target biopsy in patients undergoing repeat prostate biopsy.Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate-a basic tutorial.Magnetic resonance imaging detection of prostate cancer in men with previous negative prostate biopsy.Multi-parametric MRI imaging of the prostate-implications for focal therapy.Pre-biopsy 3-Tesla MRI and targeted biopsy of the index prostate cancer: correlation with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.Gleason Misclassification Rate Is Independent of Number of Biopsy Cores in Systematic Biopsy.Prostate cancer detection on transrectal ultrasonography-guided random biopsy despite negative real-time magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion-guided targeted biopsy: reasons for targeted biopsy failure.Prostate cancer diagnosis: the feasibility of needle-based optical coherence tomographyConfirmatory biopsy for the assessment of prostate cancer in men considering active surveillance: reference centre experience.Improved detection of anterior fibromuscular stroma and transition zone prostate cancer using biparametric and multiparametric MRI with MRI-targeted biopsy and MRI-US fusion guidance.High cancer detection rate using cognitive fusion - targeted transperineal prostate biopsiesPrebiopsy MRI and MRI-ultrasound Fusion-targeted Prostate Biopsy in Men With Previous Negative Biopsies: Impact on Repeat Biopsy Strategies.Precision of MRI/ultrasound-fusion biopsy in prostate cancer diagnosis: an ex vivo comparison of alternative biopsy techniques on prostate phantoms.Evaluation of MRI/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Prostate Biopsy Using Transrectal and Transperineal Approaches.The Influence of Serum Prostate-Specific Antigen on the Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsy versus Saturation Biopsy in Patients with Previous Negative Biopsy.Targeted versus systematic robot-assisted transperineal MRI-TRUS fusion prostate biopsy.Multicentre evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging supported transperineal prostate biopsy in biopsy-naïve men with suspicion of prostate cancer.Prospective comparison of transperineal magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion biopsy and transrectal systematic biopsy in biopsy-naïve patients.From novice to expert: analyzing the learning curve for MRI-transrectal ultrasonography fusion-guided transrectal prostate biopsy.18F-Choline PET/MRI: The Additional Value of PET for MRI-Guided Transrectal Prostate Biopsies.
P2860
Q26773645-D213C0E2-22B4-4D39-BCA8-9CD0F11919B7Q26820469-5E8532AD-6618-4899-AB56-C9FD5ABF4578Q28066534-61705DC1-17E5-4F79-8D62-57029BBACD5BQ30249514-6389ACDB-1552-491D-AFE6-EFD8D4775E1DQ30376901-B995DE50-B103-4940-8784-ABC02DBE18ABQ30883677-687FF3F1-171F-4524-A2C4-7F10DD420F2FQ30988469-BF335F94-D229-47DA-A04C-6A675C2CA789Q33890171-4904B5CD-8EEC-429D-BAF8-1458018AE269Q36249431-AD96B767-2FD9-4AC6-AC08-1EE148257FA5Q36706373-4BFE18E7-0DDA-45B0-BB7E-B09A7B2416F9Q36707864-4FB2AEE0-EBE6-4FDA-A5F5-F7FFD0AF1E1DQ36946259-0E5C577D-E96B-4B88-A5E9-080DF6E2F3BBQ37009160-C749A2E2-C04C-4AC1-9B7D-E055557F96DDQ38377827-B107C158-0726-428A-8A47-25638685C52AQ38606252-C551FEB2-B1A7-4C14-9208-3F986A5EF14AQ38708189-AA5B62AE-9568-4185-9A83-1B82718EC1C5Q38841864-EB3E7726-B391-4B10-BFDD-669C941C218EQ38843911-A1C39CF0-2B71-4959-A8AE-00E4870EA41FQ38950445-4CFAA9A2-6DA5-4366-B966-D38FA339C97CQ39174624-BEBF7943-DF8E-4E6B-8AD7-686EDBC6E7FCQ39185003-BE1FBD28-00CF-4F76-A97E-DD0315368556Q39446378-FAE3B64C-9115-42E8-AA6D-62CE5E26F73FQ39446406-CAFE27EF-B106-4DFC-8DAA-12E5D5CD4EEEQ39446420-D5E5DE33-741D-4B38-9268-A3F9BD77426CQ39787686-87FBC502-0B70-4A05-A94D-213E3B945588Q39947142-64A343E3-EC37-4B94-8920-9F3A426D6926Q40524688-FCB81C9A-F620-4911-BCBB-008269235D43Q40740935-CB807385-DF41-401B-9BE5-0E5E4AE4937CQ40758146-5C1163C4-4AD2-4F77-A1AE-5513F1A45DADQ40832222-581B33E5-1857-44A6-BACE-2B6ACA4831F2Q41412002-A6AE5B8B-B013-464B-ADCB-A896523499B1Q42237453-5B19A4FA-31B6-4540-B1B6-9ADFB26F9EE4Q42501558-40738289-DCF8-4A03-ADA5-0B8BCF241CB4Q42991626-156BC2EE-0103-4E39-875B-FFDC5592199DQ45940658-2A485233-6516-4CD8-8B25-9F19340C0A43Q47357407-36D1DD89-3CA5-476F-BDD9-3A9F9E8DBDF8Q47811496-B6F01521-2F7E-442F-8B42-CF9F89D6B301Q47968669-70D93A86-A4A3-417F-BF6A-97CD6ADD4AE0Q48227453-2E9B248C-32F1-4737-B6FC-12C52886847DQ50315275-0E1FA329-E6A0-43AE-9483-6CDE9CAA839C
P2860
Comparative analysis of transperineal template saturation prostate biopsy versus magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy with magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion guidance.
description
2014 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2014年の論文
@ja
2014年論文
@yue
2014年論文
@zh-hant
2014年論文
@zh-hk
2014年論文
@zh-mo
2014年論文
@zh-tw
2014年论文
@wuu
2014年论文
@zh
2014年论文
@zh-cn
name
Comparative analysis of transp ...... ng-ultrasound fusion guidance.
@en
type
label
Comparative analysis of transp ...... ng-ultrasound fusion guidance.
@en
prefLabel
Comparative analysis of transp ...... ng-ultrasound fusion guidance.
@en
P2093
P1476
Comparative analysis of transp ...... ng-ultrasound fusion guidance.
@en
P2093
Celine D Alt
Claudia Bergstraesser
Clemens Huettenbrink
Heinz-Peter Schlemmer
Ionel V Popeneciu
Jan P Radtke
Matthias Roethke
Sarah Steinemann
Silvan Boxler
Tilman Klein
P356
10.1016/J.JURO.2014.07.098
P407
P577
2014-07-28T00:00:00Z