EVALUATE hysterectomy trial: a multicentre randomised trial comparing abdominal, vaginal and laparoscopic methods of hysterectomy.
about
Economic Evaluation alongside Multinational Studies: A Systematic Review of Empirical StudiesTotal laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of patients with early stage endometrial cancer: a randomized multi center study.Costs and effects of abdominal versus laparoscopic hysterectomy: systematic review of controlled trials.Twenty-first century laparoscopic hysterectomy: should we not leave the vaginal step out?The impact of different surgical modalities for hysterectomy on satisfaction and patient reported outcomesObstructive defecation in middle-aged women.Bidirectional barbed suture: an evaluation of safety and clinical outcomes.Cost-effectiveness of hysterectomy for benign gynecological conditions: a systematic review.Cost effectiveness analysis of laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with standard hysterectomy: results from a randomised trialDeprivation and poor psychosocial support are key determinants of late antenatal presentation and poor fetal outcomes--a combined retrospective and prospective studySexuality and body image after uterine artery embolization and hysterectomy in the treatment of uterine fibroids: a randomized comparison.A new approach to simplify surgical colpotomy in laparoscopic hysterectomyThe cost-effectiveness of total laparoscopic hysterectomy compared to total abdominal hysterectomy for the treatment of early stage endometrial cancer.Nanomedicine for uterine leiomyoma therapyA prospective study of quality of life among women undergoing risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy versus gynecologic screening for ovarian cancerA Comparison of Complications between Open Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy and Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy for the Treatment of Vault ProlapseIndications and Route of Hysterectomy for Benign Diseases. Guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S3 Level, AWMF Registry No. 015/070, April 2015)Cervical Detachment Using Monopolar SupraLoop™ Electrode versus Monopolar Needle in Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy (LSH): An Interventional, Comparative Cohort Study.An alternative system for transvaginal removal of dermoid cyst and a comparative study with laparoscopy.Vaginal vault dehiscence after laparoscopic hysterectomy over a nine-year period at Sydney West Advanced Pelvic Surgery Unit - our experiences and current understanding of vaginal vault dehiscence.The increasing use of robot-assisted approach for hysterectomy results in decreasing rates of abdominal hysterectomy and traditional laparoscopic hysterectomy.For U.S. Black women, shift of hysterectomy to outpatient settings may have lagged behind White women: a claims-based analysis, 2011-2013Total laparoscopic hysterectomy, vaginal hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy using electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing technique: a randomized controlled trial.Safety and economical innovations regarding surgical treatment of fibroids.Laparoscopic hysterectomy in the overweight and obese: does 3D imaging make a change?Survey of obstetrics and gynecology residents' training and opinions on robotic surgery.Subtotal versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy: could women sexual function recovery overcome the surgical outcomes in pre-operatory decision making?Comparison of two different laparoscopic hysterectomies: laparoscopic hysterectomy vs. total laparoscopic hysterectomy.Achieving consensus on the definition of conversion to laparotomy: a Delphi study among general surgeons, gynecologists, and urologists.Introducing new health interventions.Factors for a Successful Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in Very Large Uteri.Morbidity with total laparoscopic and laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy.Health-related quality of life after laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy: is uterine weight a major factor?Pain reduction after total laparoscopic hysterectomy and laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy among women with dysmenorrhoea: a randomised controlled trial.Taxonomy for methods of resource use measurement.Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy for patients with extensive pelvic adhesions: a strategy to minimise conversion to laparotomy.Comparison of abdominal, vaginal, and laparoscopic hysterectomies in a tertiary care hospital in Turkey.Evidence-based implementation and increase in the rate of laparoscopic hysterectomy.Cost-benefit analysis of laparoscopic surgery versus laparotomy for patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer: experience from an institute in China.Laparoscopic morcellation: an acceptable risk or an Achilles heel?
P2860
Q28083366-BCFD6081-C113-4ABA-9A72-B0B0981263ECQ33400119-82F0799C-A18D-4F85-B5E1-FE4467944FB3Q33508822-507E2EC2-CF6A-4DE5-BE6B-4C70737EACD7Q33722348-24FD1285-5A64-4DBF-BDE2-7D204394E988Q34029676-764552B3-C01F-45D2-9644-FECA9B2BF2BFQ34536435-E3BC3E03-0F4E-4A30-8B7E-BF197B1AF88BQ34582470-8B68F183-484D-4D83-8C15-38D2D1021D3DQ35030338-716325E4-DD1D-4BF5-953D-5A1F9FA62DB1Q35132099-5ED4DE4E-1CE4-4AAF-9587-0AB53F230E45Q35853219-BA2031CD-F2AA-4D61-96B4-8A6452ED4DB3Q36087487-3BCA5F8F-5F33-4E05-B7D0-1BF0BFC40194Q36578971-F4DA06B2-17AB-4759-A719-E3D5D1E1403AQ36809978-5DDBCEA9-B44B-4E37-A8EE-74F3071A4400Q37124426-10CFEA2B-6DB3-4D5D-804A-EA4F1C43EE6BQ37230423-B2BD5A72-E413-4881-B3C0-63A2CB1C70EDQ37245061-634CD84B-3F86-4A71-AEED-A46BC4E0A7F4Q37272670-D587793A-A6D5-4C15-A2D5-6347113611C5Q37389680-8ED190D6-54F0-4FE3-9DA1-CF71D2BF9638Q37899662-6CC97887-8653-4916-A02C-9F18920BC575Q37984094-9D8A6326-54F3-4C5C-ACEB-2CE19D2E8A5BQ38120481-17A118AB-870D-48A6-B081-D8A5417BA778Q38640388-1C1E8C21-B180-4C02-A118-714BD98EACE4Q38869598-A873F019-FB5B-40C8-AD45-39AEF2E8FDC5Q38872950-0804C6A0-CF10-4797-8C8A-EE216303F597Q39297332-78323173-49FC-4FB9-86AB-98C7AB9814A5Q39878242-2B928C47-1F4C-4F9B-84FE-1C1E79D74109Q40178278-812E9C46-B9EC-4AE7-91F3-3A608D400ACCQ41988196-948388B3-D361-46C5-8BC7-C24B40904674Q42608574-0008DEDA-CC67-4F6A-AEB9-EA9752E8EED8Q43154666-2BF7B965-E096-43CC-87DE-CBE1A93454B8Q43379213-3C8DA742-A5B3-4515-A1FB-978F0C43F1F6Q43551152-CFE1F1F8-17AE-4D09-AF9E-3A451A1612B9Q47317929-4A782EB5-D28B-40C4-B632-1E73FEA79F2AQ48040499-13199C0F-25DA-4462-8027-B108747B71E5Q48611140-8EB4CD9A-CFB6-4634-932C-87A9D1267E98Q48909493-4B0FEF25-2308-4096-868A-AA2ECDBEF0E8Q50525164-4A3BDD89-9A7E-48A1-8721-1E1859AF7D42Q50611866-90E2090F-67B5-4009-9A1D-94E446CEF71AQ50952658-ED4DC2F5-55F8-4473-ADA4-F1277781EB51Q53440851-3C3C701C-6D71-4BBA-898B-BDD05D3B8915
P2860
EVALUATE hysterectomy trial: a multicentre randomised trial comparing abdominal, vaginal and laparoscopic methods of hysterectomy.
description
2004 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2004年の論文
@ja
2004年学术文章
@wuu
2004年学术文章
@zh-cn
2004年学术文章
@zh-hans
2004年学术文章
@zh-my
2004年学术文章
@zh-sg
2004年學術文章
@yue
2004年學術文章
@zh
2004年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
EVALUATE hysterectomy trial: a ...... copic methods of hysterectomy.
@en
type
label
EVALUATE hysterectomy trial: a ...... copic methods of hysterectomy.
@en
prefLabel
EVALUATE hysterectomy trial: a ...... copic methods of hysterectomy.
@en
P2093
P356
P1476
EVALUATE hysterectomy trial: a ...... copic methods of hysterectomy.
@en
P2093
Bridgman S
Fountain J
Sculpher M
P356
10.3310/HTA8260
P577
2004-06-01T00:00:00Z