A qualitative evaluation of implementing a randomized controlled trial in general practice.
about
Recruitment and retention in a multicentre randomised controlled trial in Bell's palsy: a case studyFinancial considerations in the conduct of multi-centre randomised controlled trials: evidence from a qualitative studyRecruitment strategies in two reproductive medicine network infertility trialsProjection of participant recruitment to primary care research: a qualitative study.Effect of an education and activation programme on functional limitations and patient-perceived recovery in acute and sub-acute shoulder complaints - a randomised clinical trialThe external validity of published randomized controlled trials in primary care.Strategies for improving patient recruitment to focus groups in primary care: a case study reflective paper using an analytical frameworkA clinical trial alert tool to recruit large patient samples and assess selection bias in general practice research.Building an international network for a primary care research program: reflections on challenges and solutions in the set-up and delivery of a prospective observational study of acute cough in 13 European countriesComparison of two recruitment strategies for patients with chronic shoulder complaintsMaximising recruitment and retention of general practices in clinical trials: a case study.Researchers' and clinicians' perceptions of recruiting participants to clinical research: a thematic meta-synthesis.A technical infrastructure to conduct randomized database studies facilitated by a general practice research database.An evaluation of the impact and costs of three strategies used to recruit acutely unwell young children to a randomised controlled trial in primary care.Conducting randomised controlled trials in primary care: lessons from an obesity management trial.Impact of a deferred recruitment model in a randomised controlled trial in primary care (CREAM study).Practice nurses and obesity: professional and practice-based factors affecting role adequacy and role legitimacy.Partnering with mental health providers: a guide for services researchers.Family work in anorexia nervosa: a qualitative study of carers' experiences of two methods of family intervention.
P2860
Q28221717-7E050D55-1303-4D53-9943-1EE81EF9ED98Q28763783-759131F0-C7AA-4C4D-B4A6-860846811E9AQ30355482-AE24EFC3-484E-4B28-BF9D-37C59416218AQ30670218-443D1A3F-F394-4363-B555-A19B56A98EE0Q33305707-44C8998E-B9A4-4903-A6FA-F444E151B6B8Q33400855-CACB4A0D-6510-4394-A189-9D7823C5C2F3Q33505816-06AD6403-9B14-4E64-9629-F9ABD9617DA2Q33820314-E563D600-499F-4073-98C7-401A9C501068Q33973002-F8955CFC-4991-4CC9-98C9-0FD5CD65A9E2Q35688623-13FA8A0F-03F5-4D80-95DB-7F88370F41AAQ36950843-74209580-7B3A-4D0A-A3D7-52A25D2098BDQ37701141-5E51F833-8989-42CE-80F4-9FD13218094FQ38456939-25D46C5E-5577-45D8-BAA5-FE82140FC041Q39375363-E7BC1847-1333-453D-9A2F-2C00D826D5ABQ42775935-29335832-915A-4E5C-96C3-12DA338E4337Q47121934-E28203C8-56E6-4898-BC29-6BD9A7D62727Q47959864-1B67A6D5-5556-4601-ACB4-24633762D685Q50743377-5F663D50-7410-4EAF-9230-CCAC8C6195EFQ51861920-A6C4C575-5C5F-4898-AA7A-C3CF5822ACFA
P2860
A qualitative evaluation of implementing a randomized controlled trial in general practice.
description
2003 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2003年の論文
@ja
2003年論文
@yue
2003年論文
@zh-hant
2003年論文
@zh-hk
2003年論文
@zh-mo
2003年論文
@zh-tw
2003年论文
@wuu
2003年论文
@zh
2003年论文
@zh-cn
name
A qualitative evaluation of im ...... led trial in general practice.
@en
type
label
A qualitative evaluation of im ...... led trial in general practice.
@en
prefLabel
A qualitative evaluation of im ...... led trial in general practice.
@en
P2093
P356
P1433
P1476
A qualitative evaluation of im ...... led trial in general practice.
@en
P2093
Hayley Prout
Kerenza Hood
Mike Robling
Paul Kinnersley
Rhiannedd Tudor-Jones
P304
P356
10.1093/FAMPRA/CMG609
P407
P577
2003-12-01T00:00:00Z