Evaluating the quality of articles published in journal supplements compared with the quality of those published in the parent journal.
about
Citability of original research and reviews in journals and their sponsored supplementsPharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic reviewFunding source, trial outcome and reporting quality: are they related? Results of a pilot studyMedical journals are an extension of the marketing arm of pharmaceutical companies.Do glucosamine and chondroitin treat the symptoms of osteoarthritis?Financial, nonfinancial and editors' conflicts of interest in high-impact biomedical journals.The availability of references and the sponsorship of original research cited in pharmaceutical advertisements.Development and evaluation of an instrument for the critical appraisal of randomized controlled trials of natural productsIndustry sponsorship and authorship of clinical trials over 20 years.Tobacco industry manipulation of research.Assessing the evidence submitted in the development of a workplace smoking regulation: the case of Maryland."Ten Commandments" for the Appropriate use of Antibiotics by the Practicing Physician in an Outpatient SettingBias During the Evaluation of Animal Studies?Financial ties and concordance between results and conclusions in meta-analyses: retrospective cohort studyDenial of effective treatment and poor quality of clinical information in placebo controlled trials of ondansetron for postoperative nausea and vomiting: a review of published trials.Effect of therapeutic exercise for hip osteoarthritis pain: results of a meta-analysisTotal body water measurement using bioelectrical impedance analysis, isotope dilution and total body potassium: a scoring system to facilitate intercomparison.Reporting and concordance of methodologic criteria between abstracts and articles in diagnostic test studies.Bias in the research literature and conflict of interest: an issue for publishers, editors, reviewers and authors, and it is not just about the money.Beyond conflict of interest. Transparency is the keyAccepting commercial sponsorship. Disclosure helps--but is not a panacea.WHO faces up to its tobacco links.Medical journals and pharmaceutical companies: uneasy bedfellows.Managing conflict of interest: sense and sensibility.Evaluating public commentary and scientific evidence submitted in the development of a risk assessment.Conflict of interest in oncology publications: a survey of disclosure policies and statements.Industry collaboration, scientific sharing, and the dissemination of knowledge
P2860
Q21091143-CA0DC53B-64B8-4B22-9603-EE7B0CD97FD6Q24673248-46EBFAFF-9094-4DB1-8317-30C60719E97DQ24802299-6D2E9E1B-183A-4C9A-8BC4-344DFCD84C52Q24810066-32E19AF7-37FE-477B-A5E6-33B54D843F0BQ28354361-B2D12579-5343-472E-AAF1-DF087164B82AQ30486067-A107E1B8-6BEB-472F-BF5E-81050D4E3F4FQ33211922-90059DAA-6E23-4530-8D26-D81194B249B5Q33434170-A0081F41-144C-4BF3-9E72-278DC5064DDEQ34300884-708D1F89-23BD-4E92-A9D1-FAABA462D1B6Q34412704-DB124A68-0E42-407E-8006-C5A77057719AQ34997259-7E5B87F3-7D20-496C-AD4B-DFB76B8DEEB0Q35575828-A5A94CEF-58CF-4CD3-A8C2-8BEC5DBE2646Q35826797-D97EB02B-315C-4AF8-8860-EC578B42EA30Q36248519-B6FA6AF7-EBBB-4554-AEA9-19688434B162Q36905066-92357D78-1F6A-4B51-B55F-9656B4118124Q37379051-1AA050FA-0E78-4095-9B2F-B65FA9340E27Q40645471-D8D61462-8AF5-4523-87BE-F8EB26F8148DQ41245382-6F8FA46C-3DD9-4325-BE47-555DC744AC19Q42671841-4B21C066-04B1-4658-9433-91DB229ABB2EQ42757804-45F83DCA-529B-40C4-9E05-F25291A4698CQ42764015-79F4B336-2E71-4F54-881F-71771BBFAAEAQ42767720-1930A050-E69E-499F-8F7B-2CBC99A6B23DQ42783290-6A0C4952-A674-4858-8C70-9C45CB88A6B3Q42962752-A500753B-54D6-4F00-9A81-229BD91AB77EQ46000996-CCA80154-7CA1-411E-91E9-41D22A981AD6Q48638357-73FD6C82-AAF1-4E92-A3BD-8D9E0342DB10Q56875695-FFEEA5EE-28FD-43B3-9C1F-6215EF614B62
P2860
Evaluating the quality of articles published in journal supplements compared with the quality of those published in the parent journal.
description
1994 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
1994年の論文
@ja
1994年論文
@yue
1994年論文
@zh-hant
1994年論文
@zh-hk
1994年論文
@zh-mo
1994年論文
@zh-tw
1994年论文
@wuu
1994年论文
@zh
1994年论文
@zh-cn
name
Evaluating the quality of arti ...... blished in the parent journal.
@en
type
label
Evaluating the quality of arti ...... blished in the parent journal.
@en
prefLabel
Evaluating the quality of arti ...... blished in the parent journal.
@en
P2093
P1476
Evaluating the quality of arti ...... blished in the parent journal.
@en
P2093
C M Cheung
J H Gurwitz
P A Rochon
T C Chalmers
P304
P356
10.1001/JAMA.1994.03520020034009
P407
P577
1994-07-01T00:00:00Z