The explicit mentioning of reporting guidelines in urogynecology journals in 2013: A bibliometric study.

about

Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review.

P2860

Q47159405-9C479D39-E32B-4D5D-8A08-936733A51AFC

P2860

The explicit mentioning of reporting guidelines in urogynecology journals in 2013: A bibliometric study.

Item

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q41528654

description

2015 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2015年の論文

@ja

2015年論文

@yue

2015年論文

@zh-hant

2015年論文

@zh-hk

2015年論文

@zh-mo

2015年論文

@zh-tw

2015年论文

@wuu

2015年论文

@zh

2015年论文

@zh-cn

name

The explicit mentioning of rep ...... in 2013: A bibliometric study.

@en

type

Item

label

The explicit mentioning of rep ...... in 2013: A bibliometric study.

@en

prefLabel

The explicit mentioning of rep ...... in 2013: A bibliometric study.

@en

P1476

The explicit mentioning of rep ...... in 2013: A bibliometric study.

@en

P2093

Engelbert Hanzal

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Paul Riss

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Wolfgang Umek

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

The quality of methods reporting in parasitology experiments

Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network

Helping editors, peer reviewers and authors improve the clarity, completeness and transparency of reporting health research

Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane review

On the reproducibility of science: unique identification of research resources in the biomedical literature

The EQUATOR Network and reporting guidelines: Helping to achieve high standards in reporting health research studies.

Responsible reporting of health research studies: transparent, complete, accurate and timely

The quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials in pelvic organ prolapse.

Effect of using reporting guidelines during peer review on quality of final manuscripts submitted to a biomedical journal: masked randomised trial

Adherence to CONSORT adverse event reporting guidelines in randomized clinical trials evaluating systemic cancer therapy: a systematic review.

P304

412-416

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1002/NAU.22726

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Marianne Koch

P577

2015-01-24T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

271388275

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

25620401

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P921

bibliometrics

The explicit mentioning of reporting guidelines in urogynecology journals in 2013: A bibliometric study.

about

P2860

P2860

The explicit mentioning of reporting guidelines in urogynecology journals in 2013: A bibliometric study.

description

name

type

label

prefLabel

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P304

P31

P356

P433

P478

P50

P577

P5875

P698

P921

P356

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P304

P31

P356

P433

P478

P50

P577

P5875

P698

P921