Tumor delineation: The weakest link in the search for accuracy in radiotherapy.
about
Functional magnetic resonance imaging techniques and their development for radiation therapy planning and monitoring in the head and neck cancersCoverage-based treatment planning to accommodate delineation uncertainties in prostate cancer treatment.Development of a software for quantitative evaluation radiotherapy target and organ-at-risk segmentation comparison.Prospective randomized double-blind pilot study of site-specific consensus atlas implementation for rectal cancer target volume delineation in the cooperative group setting.Point/counterpoint: vendor provided machine data should never be used as a substitute for fully commissioning a linear accelerator.Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation (APBI): A review of available techniques.Impact of the introduction of weekly radiotherapy quality assurance meetings at one UK cancer centre.Imaging strategies in the management of oesophageal cancer: what's the role of MRI?Target Contour Testing/Instructional Computer Software (TaCTICS): A Novel Training and Evaluation Platform for Radiotherapy Target Delineation.A pilot prospective feasibility study of organ-at-risk definition using Target Contour Testing/Instructional Computer Software (TaCTICS), a training and evaluation platform for radiotherapy target delineation.Multimodality imaging with CT, MR and FDG-PET for radiotherapy target volume delineation in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.A multimodality segmentation framework for automatic target delineation in head and neck radiotherapy.Dosimetric impact of inter-observer variability for 3D conformal radiotherapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy: the rectal tumor target definition case.Quantitative assessment of target delineation variability for thymic cancers: Agreement evaluation of a prospective segmentation challenge.Contour propagation using feature-based deformable registration for lung cancer.Automatic segmentation software in locally advanced rectal cancer: READY (REsearch program in Auto Delineation sYstem)-RECTAL 02: prospective study.Optimal single 3T MR imaging sequence for HDR brachytherapy of cervical cancer.Technological advances in radiotherapy for esophageal cancerCritical discussion of evaluation parameters for inter-observer variability in target definition for radiation therapy.The future of image-guided radiotherapy will be MR guided.Use of auto-segmentation in the delineation of target volumes and organs at risk in head and neck.Modelling tumour volume variations in head and neck cancer: contribution of magnetic resonance imaging for patients undergoing induction chemotherapy.An evaluation of the robustness of organ-at-risk recommendations made by GEC/ESTRO according to interobserver variability: a single-center experience.Compared planning dosimetry of TOMO, VMAT and IMRT in rectal cancer with different simulated positions.Image similarity evaluation of the bulk-density-assigned synthetic CT derived from MRI of intracranial regions for radiation treatment.Adaptive threshold segmentation of pituitary adenomas from FDG PET images for radiosurgery.Sensitivity of postplanning target and OAR coverage estimates to dosimetric margin distribution sampling parameters.In situ study of the impact of inter- and intra-reader variability on region of interest (ROI) analysis in preclinical molecular imagingVariability in prostate and seminal vesicle delineations defined on magnetic resonance images, a multi-observer, -center and -sequence studyThe effect of image-guided radiation therapy on the margin between the clinical target volume and planning target volume in lung cancerTarget volume delineation and margins in the management of lung cancers in the era of image guided radiation therapy.Autodelineation of cervical cancers using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and machine learning.Point/Counterpoint. Evaluation of treatment plans using target and normal tissue DVHs is no longer appropriate.MRI-only treatment planning: benefits and challenges.Visualization of 4D multimodal imaging data and its applications in radiotherapy planning.Practice patterns for the radical treatment of nasopharyngeal cancer by head and neck oncologists in the United Kingdom.Comprehensive MRI simulation methodology using a dedicated MRI scanner in radiation oncology for external beam radiation treatment planning.Automatic planning of head and neck treatment plans.Benchmarking of a treatment planning system for spot scanning proton therapy: comparison and analysis of robustness to setup errors of photon IMRT and proton SFUD treatment plans of base of skull meningioma.Impact of a Novel Bioabsorbable Implant on Radiation Treatment Planning for Breast Cancer.
P2860
Q28075983-7150A67C-9F45-4C81-81D2-BE7E1ADEB9ECQ30278771-C3F18C15-4016-46CF-BF19-3AB3C62608BEQ30486369-8EA09964-FE60-4849-92E4-9AE491B44C6CQ34088596-C7B75826-A12E-48D9-A58C-3FC92BE76191Q34155124-7105056D-2DE2-4470-8E80-99BE44315246Q34221220-C9D46756-681E-40E2-92E5-04DDFDCD80D9Q34392133-8493FBD7-514E-40FF-85C6-55B715E30979Q34583617-DAF57699-C656-4F9C-A14E-E88686B31B58Q34583833-13D802EB-C3BC-4CB8-9DF2-8FA9EA1F6593Q35625117-532617BC-EA56-4AD3-A668-6F967C4C619BQ35830998-7F19C5C3-E2EB-4789-86DE-36953DADEDF3Q35983014-8BF2F03A-23A8-4A21-83DA-12F402097242Q37038061-428EE2D7-C9D4-471E-A7C1-4432B6E145A5Q37201170-13411EF0-975F-498E-AFCC-24F638B14976Q37398252-2ABEBD12-0EBF-423D-8D26-DEBC199866E5Q37520623-C42FA1B1-87CE-4300-B30E-BDEFAF717F72Q37730042-07D354BE-CF71-42E9-B1CF-FB5F97A0D26BQ37812088-5D9C9F74-43C2-4E89-80DE-58FF3A516387Q37979128-46FF152B-C822-487F-A42A-0937EA7E1330Q38751141-ADF2BB3F-8B2E-4768-B43D-FF708AB8A5B2Q38850028-9D51DBC1-0027-4BB5-B02C-C42A76A409EFQ39145943-2C7B5CA1-54B2-4136-87AF-7346E753E62BQ41061949-608B74C8-4453-45B7-A3A1-452B79761059Q41091862-7887C36C-3ECD-43A7-BD0E-13F53FE3CBC4Q41677215-088E14C0-1D79-4C9F-BC51-14561BBC0CF1Q41706913-807459BE-21DC-47B3-B30D-2C4F7EE410EDQ41775421-47D43F40-9709-426C-B7AF-CF2720452A24Q41828483-1137B17C-E187-4E87-8841-A9AAF75E8A19Q41971411-B47F36EC-6FC8-4D1F-8212-739DFE6C1E4FQ41985425-7EAF39FD-25F7-4EA1-9CFC-3EE16510D0B0Q42286681-DDF50F17-1761-4F14-9BE0-9874FB2EC0DCQ45947546-0810A87A-E159-4109-90CB-CFCE9668FBE8Q46501557-ACCDEB4E-41D5-40CE-8B26-98FC534CA885Q47552735-05EBBB36-6A90-4936-95CF-0E4762866403Q47693411-C5AD02EB-6913-45CB-9717-2C642B3CA18DQ48185045-E417C8FD-0598-4282-BA29-CED9114CCA80Q48389302-2C7A7AAD-290D-4E47-8183-496A0BCBEAFFQ50709135-85BFE49B-C41D-4369-AEFF-C8663E46C444Q51016643-8FC0D0A0-0F35-4E4F-94FF-C8D6C0302158Q51144754-DC45AAAC-38C2-420C-903F-068CCB48920D
P2860
Tumor delineation: The weakest link in the search for accuracy in radiotherapy.
description
2008 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2008年の論文
@ja
2008年論文
@yue
2008年論文
@zh-hant
2008年論文
@zh-hk
2008年論文
@zh-mo
2008年論文
@zh-tw
2008年论文
@wuu
2008年论文
@zh
2008年论文
@zh-cn
name
Tumor delineation: The weakest link in the search for accuracy in radiotherapy.
@en
Tumor delineation: The weakest link in the search for accuracy in radiotherapy.
@nl
type
label
Tumor delineation: The weakest link in the search for accuracy in radiotherapy.
@en
Tumor delineation: The weakest link in the search for accuracy in radiotherapy.
@nl
prefLabel
Tumor delineation: The weakest link in the search for accuracy in radiotherapy.
@en
Tumor delineation: The weakest link in the search for accuracy in radiotherapy.
@nl
P2860
P356
P1476
Tumor delineation: The weakest link in the search for accuracy in radiotherapy.
@en
P2093
P2860
P304
P356
10.4103/0971-6203.44472
P577
2008-10-01T00:00:00Z