Ultrashort versus Conventional Anatomic Cementless Femoral Stems in the Same Patients Younger Than 55 Years.
about
Periprosthetic bone remodeling of short cementless femoral stems in primary total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials.Uncemented short stems in primary total hip arthroplasty: The state of the art.Are short-stem prostheses superior to conventional stem prostheses in primary total hip arthroplasty? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
P2860
Ultrashort versus Conventional Anatomic Cementless Femoral Stems in the Same Patients Younger Than 55 Years.
description
2016 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2016年の論文
@ja
2016年論文
@yue
2016年論文
@zh-hant
2016年論文
@zh-hk
2016年論文
@zh-mo
2016年論文
@zh-tw
2016年论文
@wuu
2016年论文
@zh
2016年论文
@zh-cn
name
Ultrashort versus Conventional ...... atients Younger Than 55 Years.
@en
Ultrashort versus Conventional ...... atients Younger Than 55 Years.
@nl
type
label
Ultrashort versus Conventional ...... atients Younger Than 55 Years.
@en
Ultrashort versus Conventional ...... atients Younger Than 55 Years.
@nl
prefLabel
Ultrashort versus Conventional ...... atients Younger Than 55 Years.
@en
Ultrashort versus Conventional ...... atients Younger Than 55 Years.
@nl
P2860
P1476
Ultrashort versus Conventional ...... Patients Younger Than 55 Years
@en
P2093
Jun-Shik Kim
Young-Hoo Kim
P2860
P2888
P304
P356
10.1007/S11999-016-4902-4
P407
P577
2016-06-03T00:00:00Z