Comparison of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion performed with a minimally invasive approach or a traditional open approach.
about
Lumbar Stenosis: A Recent Update by Review of LiteratureMinimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic reviewComparative outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for posterior lumbar fusion: a systematic reviewOperative Management of a Sacral Gunshot Injury via Minimally Invasive Techniques and Instrumentation.Minimally invasive removal of a giant extradural lumbar foraminal schwannoma.MASTERS-D Study: A Prospective, Multicenter, Pragmatic, Observational, Data-Monitored Trial of Minimally Invasive Fusion to Treat Degenerative Lumbar Disorders, One-Year Follow-Up.Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis and degenerative spondylosis: 5-year results.Does minimally invasive transsacral fixation provide anterior column support in adult scoliosis?Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with unilateral pedicle screw fixation: comparison between primary and revision surgery.Posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion in spondylolisthesis: a prospective controlled study in the Han nationalityPerioperative and short-term advantages of mini-open approach for lumbar spinal fusion.Biomechanical evaluation of a new AxiaLIF technique for two-level lumbar fusion.Multifidus muscle changes and clinical effects of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion: minimally invasive procedure versus conventional open approach.Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using a single interbody cage and a tubular retraction system : technical tips, and perioperative, radiologic and clinical outcomes.Clinical application of the paraspinal erector approach for spinal canal decompression in upper lumber burst fracturesClinical and radiographic outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.Cost-utility analysis of posterior minimally invasive fusion compared with conventional open fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis.Surgical data and early postoperative outcomes after minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion: results of a prospective, multicenter, observational data-monitored study.Perioperative morbidity and complications in minimal access surgery techniques in obese patients with degenerative lumbar disease.Surgical outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of spondylolisthesis and degenerative segmental instabilityCorrection of Coronal Imbalance in Degenerative Lumbar Spine Disease Following Direct Lateral Interbody Fusion (DLIF)Initial clinical outcomes of minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative lumbar disease: a preliminary report on the experience of a single institution with 30 cases.Comparative analysis of adjacent levels of degeneration and clinical outcomes between conventional pedicle screws and percutaneous pedicle screws in treatment of degenerative disease at l3-5; a preliminary reportSingle incision percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.Unilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation is Associated with Reduced Cost and Similar Outcomes in Selected Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for L4-5 Degenerative SpondylolisthesisRobot assisted navigated drilling for percutaneous pedicle screw placement: A preliminary animal study.Spinous process-splitting open pedicle screw fusion provides favorable results in patients with low back discomfort and pain compared to conventional open pedicle screw fixation over 1 year after surgeryBiomechanical investigation of a minimally invasive posterior spine stabilization system in comparison to the Universal Spinal System (USS)Mid-term clinical results of minimally invasive decompression and posterolateral fusion with percutaneous pedicle screws versus conventional approach for degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis.Comparison of superior-level facet joint violations during open and percutaneous pedicle screw placementNavigated 2-level posterior lumbar fusion: a 5-cm-incision procedureClinical and radiological outcome of minimally invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion in primary versus revision surgery.Accuracy of percutaneous pedicle screws for thoracic and lumbar spine fractures: a prospective trial.The international spine registry SPINE TANGO: status quo and first results.Percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: is it worth it?Total 3D Airo® Navigation for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.Minimally invasive surgery in adult degenerative scoliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of decompression, anterior/lateral and posterior lumbar approachesClinical outcomes of minimally invasive versus open approach for one-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at the 3- to 4-year follow-up.Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis grades 1-2: patient-reported clinical outcomes and cost-utility analysis."Minimally invasive" lumbar spine surgery: a critical review.
P2860
Q26782169-5D764C9B-4BBF-4919-AD3F-F3D7B9300EADQ26998231-5C09D12F-0C39-4CF8-8068-A9011F8D1253Q27014738-175F5244-5036-4768-8FB5-493926FC9638Q30421856-39F7852E-39B5-4B3F-BBB1-A1F14726BCB9Q30485341-92ED53D6-3512-48AD-BD1E-DA69F784F608Q31115750-971019F2-8495-40E6-8B5E-667040411E5EQ33592141-3DCCF30E-8DEF-4698-A48B-51F639156585Q33592160-5CDE3083-C4A1-4AFB-96A0-98E4C7FC58D8Q33739973-3BEB1C78-30DB-4CB8-B7AD-A808A5D1F8C1Q33969823-CAAEAF69-91DB-4042-A757-2ED4F1D6F729Q33972717-56FE0EBE-06D9-486B-828B-B20B5ECB12EBQ33973278-145F1881-CBD9-4E27-9C36-B5148A5993C5Q33974004-163E0A81-E296-4B48-9B81-9C15E3053A12Q34254163-C10ADDCF-F52C-4CC3-91AD-7943F92BF54FQ34558478-90709098-1298-4C73-BE89-4097CF712622Q35194264-6959B473-D75A-48B6-AB5F-8DDCD56DFDA3Q35194280-945AD14B-6A37-43EF-9C71-DEF1940F9B88Q35219867-C165C409-91EB-4362-9C50-F5EF4F006EA7Q35223198-225ED7DA-F791-4DDA-83D5-75C55849CBB3Q35592535-4C7C6ADF-F45B-4FDA-A4DC-85DCDFD86D91Q35604490-0D9C8EA7-25A0-4E41-BCE8-E9CDCAC8DDE5Q35604498-173FFB93-C23E-4A15-A043-99E8E376EB06Q35608286-CCFB8D38-DFC1-462E-B461-5F6AB30C3789Q35608303-C733DC0D-D5C0-4433-8591-0F75571B2104Q35827618-A858398B-13BA-4732-AC40-122772A722CCQ35877992-06522593-0247-40C3-88F1-90E21DDC3733Q35888306-7FB2B53E-83FE-4568-93A6-6DF0DC40470DQ35966779-39DEB6E6-3BDE-40B9-B4BB-F90588592EC0Q36004405-828576DE-8451-4543-A89F-13D2AA259281Q36335843-8FA172FF-A143-41BC-8201-227055A0B09FQ36428531-8B07B80C-8500-4DAB-8F20-08F5DF939C18Q36428579-30AF58A8-2032-406B-A4D8-A04E026F5003Q36648602-FA109F9F-8CAB-4A0E-BC25-399390E9C129Q36856840-96B190FF-9D93-403B-AB04-AD73D4EF4A0DQ37057463-C043B9D8-CC8A-43E8-864C-CFF4CA1016DEQ37162789-2C56AD11-D7DC-4800-AEAF-055C9F7BEEFDQ37291669-C949BD67-82BE-4497-9BF5-43571FF5BA87Q37350528-53F69EDD-62F1-432F-AEE2-AF80FD527687Q37657241-237AF943-C845-4698-BAAE-966FBBDFAEDDQ37870826-A2113DFD-6643-4B56-AD06-5899A309D89E
P2860
Comparison of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion performed with a minimally invasive approach or a traditional open approach.
description
2007 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2007年の論文
@ja
2007年論文
@yue
2007年論文
@zh-hant
2007年論文
@zh-hk
2007年論文
@zh-mo
2007年論文
@zh-tw
2007年论文
@wuu
2007年论文
@zh
2007年论文
@zh-cn
name
Comparison of one-level poster ...... r a traditional open approach.
@en
Comparison of one-level poster ...... r a traditional open approach.
@nl
type
label
Comparison of one-level poster ...... r a traditional open approach.
@en
Comparison of one-level poster ...... r a traditional open approach.
@nl
prefLabel
Comparison of one-level poster ...... r a traditional open approach.
@en
Comparison of one-level poster ...... r a traditional open approach.
@nl
P1433
P1476
Comparison of one-level poster ...... r a traditional open approach.
@en
P2093
Joong Won Ha
P304
P356
10.1097/01.BRS.0000256473.49791.F4
P407
P577
2007-03-01T00:00:00Z