Dependency issues in survival analyses of 55,782 primary hip replacements from 47,355 patients.
about
Is there still a place for the cemented titanium femoral stem? 10,108 cases from the Norwegian Arthroplasty RegisterNo differences in outcomes between cemented and uncemented acetabular components after 12-14 years: results from a randomized controlled trial comparing Duraloc with Charnley cups.Survival of uncemented cups from a single manufacturer implanted from 1985 to 2013: Finnish Arthroplasty Register data.A clinical and radiographic 13-year follow-up study of 138 Charnley hip arthroplasties in patients 50-70 years old: comparison of university hospital data and registry data.Statistical analysis of arthroplasty register dataIntroduction of total knee arthroplasty in Lithuania: Results from the first 10 years.Reverse hybrid total hip arthroplasty.Excellent results with the cemented Lubinus SP II 130-mm femoral stem at 10 years of follow-up: 932 hips followed for 5-15 yearsUncemented and cemented primary total hip arthroplasty in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.Cementless total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in patients aged 55 years and older.Increased risk of revision of acetabular cups coated with hydroxyapatite.A stature-specific concept for uncemented, primary total hip arthroplasty.CONSORT 2010 statement: extension checklist for reporting within person randomised trialsStatistical analysis of arthroplasty data. I. Introduction and background.Statistical analysis of arthroplasty data. II. Guidelines.10-year results of the uncemented Allofit press-fit cup in young patients.Risk factors for revision of primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.Hydroxyapatite coating does not improve uncemented stem survival after total hip arthroplasty!Hospital volume affects outcome after total knee arthroplasty.Inferior outcome after hip resurfacing arthroplasty than after conventional arthroplasty. Evidence from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA) database, 1995 to 2007Risk factors for revision due to infection after primary total hip arthroplasty. A population-based study of 80,756 primary procedures in the Danish Hip Arthroplasty RegistryA modular cementless stem vs. cemented long-stem prostheses in revision surgery of the hip: a population-based study from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty RegisterShort-term outcome of 1,465 computer-navigated primary total knee replacements 2005-2008.Increased risk of revision for infection in rheumatoid arthritis patients with total hip replacementsHip resurfacing arthroplasty: short-term survivorship of 4,401 hips from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.Survival of uncemented acetabular monoblock cups: evaluation of 210 hips in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.Increasing risk of prosthetic joint infection after total hip arthroplasty.Risk factors for revision of primary total hip replacement: results from a national case-control studyExcellent long-term results of the Müller acetabular reinforcement ring in primary total hip arthroplasty: A prospective study on radiology and survival of 321 hips with a mean follow-up of 11 yearsMust bilaterality be considered in statistical analyses of total knee arthroplasty?Implant survival of the most common cemented total hip devices from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association database.Poor 10-year survivorship of hip resurfacing arthroplastyPosterior approach compared to direct lateral approach resulted in better patient-reported outcome after hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracturePostoperative start compared to preoperative start of low-molecular-weight heparin increases mortality in patients with femoral neck fractures.Patient-reported outcome and risk of revision after shoulder replacement for osteoarthritis. 1,209 cases from the Danish Shoulder Arthroplasty Registry, 2006-2010.Outcome and risk of revision following shoulder replacement in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis.Excellent long-term results of the Müller acetabular reinforcement ring in primary cup revision.Improved outcome after hip fracture surgery in Norway.2- to 9-year outcome of stemmed total knee arthroplasty. Similar failure rates in patients when used primary or as a revisionIs hospital volume associated with length of stay, re‑admissions and reoperations for total hip replacement? A population‑based register analysis of 78 hospitals and 54,505 replacements.
P2860
Q24632638-18486FD2-625F-4E03-82BD-4F7DF62E2739Q30436683-A0314C3E-1189-404D-A8C9-6C68D48450DAQ31154868-5647907C-E16D-4577-AA2F-9F33EF66939EQ33374335-D570EAF4-F83A-4D87-A91A-1302B6D7926EQ33533445-E3E0D6FA-19E2-42F6-893F-3543665EDC10Q33660270-F94FF8CD-8398-4A0A-A7E8-B33976A5D49BQ33697026-6E8E967A-D071-4EAE-B7FB-174F33E2843BQ33774981-F42F508C-BCAF-4752-9405-70DD2FEE10ACQ33795776-D4C11B20-2CE2-4FC1-9B1E-F7FE564D40F5Q33795781-DDBC0BB9-A75E-4A8D-A54B-AFE9D9C740FCQ33795786-E6660519-5761-4C53-BCBC-DA1BDE38D5D5Q33795882-EB52506B-61DA-4B6F-9F65-86F9F6E4B942Q33857464-B5E4ED86-4615-49C7-B791-818477564237Q33914164-6A0DFF72-7A1F-41D4-A5F4-E1675646782AQ33914171-5E6B7133-BCD7-4D80-807C-3C12E28B441AQ33929117-60485D57-9D88-4611-BC52-BC53A1F20E7DQ34513243-F4F6DFBC-4221-4204-A0DD-5B69EA7BDD6FQ35197607-5A8E1C14-6F5E-463F-A299-D0024B7CBF5FQ35197641-C61AD065-7B0E-4271-A6D0-5C1514F965C9Q35545834-94A1C801-2DA0-4418-BB26-14BA9780ACB7Q35545838-1B746600-3615-47C7-80BE-4F622C30EBF9Q35606001-B9E3550A-4876-429A-9A6B-698F6970CFCAQ35606086-CB22F68D-3952-4908-9626-A5D2AA805DD4Q35885274-FE0E6705-417D-4E65-B9F5-614A6CCA7252Q36013577-CB8A932F-A654-46C4-8EAC-892CFD870537Q36013580-13885FC6-8CC9-4120-BC4D-CFCDD7FB1F26Q36368575-9D755FE6-C477-4579-8DD9-A051C31068E3Q36435466-88319ED2-29CA-4BF8-9829-823885DF5812Q36740743-BFB5A34A-2566-4896-A2A0-ECEC8EF2B327Q36997529-61EB7FF1-84C1-4FA2-AA24-7EAE2AA17BF6Q37428880-E51DF7C4-137A-4D90-A87E-819F666BC880Q37428884-E9C6E558-4480-407F-ADDB-49758E9C83E0Q37597160-02B19A2D-A8D8-4A91-BC55-599C583B109CQ37597168-6A622E8E-B437-4C70-AAB4-DFE68B28ECC2Q37667118-63B73550-9DA0-4637-8794-587E463591CCQ38220366-8802D35A-CC72-4FA3-8AA2-4D5C0CF7185AQ38644828-428299F4-ACBE-44FB-8F08-29407C17BD47Q38691545-660FFFD7-2E88-46F9-A947-5DE0B0838454Q41732959-5BDE4246-7C34-45C9-B267-368FD2D4B96DQ44270075-6D43ABFA-131A-4491-839C-A56AD6A43D70
P2860
Dependency issues in survival analyses of 55,782 primary hip replacements from 47,355 patients.
description
2004 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2004年の論文
@ja
2004年論文
@yue
2004年論文
@zh-hant
2004年論文
@zh-hk
2004年論文
@zh-mo
2004年論文
@zh-tw
2004年论文
@wuu
2004年论文
@zh
2004年论文
@zh-cn
name
Dependency issues in survival ...... acements from 47,355 patients.
@en
Dependency issues in survival ...... acements from 47,355 patients.
@nl
type
label
Dependency issues in survival ...... acements from 47,355 patients.
@en
Dependency issues in survival ...... acements from 47,355 patients.
@nl
prefLabel
Dependency issues in survival ...... acements from 47,355 patients.
@en
Dependency issues in survival ...... acements from 47,355 patients.
@nl
P2093
P356
P1476
Dependency issues in survival ...... acements from 47,355 patients.
@en
P2093
Lars B Engesaeter
Leif I Havelin
Stein Atle Lie
P304
P356
10.1002/SIM.1905
P407
P577
2004-10-01T00:00:00Z