Recurrence following laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a multicenter retrospective analysis of 1,417 patients. - Wikidata - wikimedia - TriplyDB

Recurrence following laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a multicenter retrospective analysis of 1,417 patients.

Recurrence following laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a multicenter retrospective analysis of 1,417 patients.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q42648870

about

Subtotal gastrectomy for gastric cancer Clinical practice guidelines for gastric cancer in Korea: an evidence-based approach Comparison of short outcomes between laparoscopic and experienced robotic gastrectomy: A meta-analysis and systematic review Is Laparoscopic Surgery the Standard of Care for GI Luminal Cancer?Short-term surgical and long-term survival outcomes after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer Laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy performed by following the perigastric fascias and the intrafascial space for advanced upper-third gastric cancer.The current status and future perspectives of laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer.Comparison of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: an updated meta-analysis.Application of laparoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer.History of minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer in Korea.Long-term outcomes and feasibility with laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer.Prognostic Significance of Molecular Analysis of Peritoneal Fluid for Patients with Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.How much progress has been made in minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer in Korea?: a viewpoint from Korean prospective clinical trials.Prospective randomized controlled trial (phase III) to comparing laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with open distal gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma (KLASS 01).Outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy after endoscopic treatment for gastric cancer: a comparison with open gastrectomy.Oncologic specimen from laparoscopic assisted gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma is comparable to D1-open surgery: the experience of a Canadian centre Comparison of laparoscopy-assisted and open radical gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: A retrospective study in a single minimally invasive surgery center Risk factors for recurrence in T1-2N0 gastric cancer in the United States and China.Totally laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer.Analysis of prognostic factors and outcomes of gastric cancer in younger patients: a case control study using propensity score methods.Strategies for gastric cancer in the modern era.Minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer: the future standard of care.Minimally invasive approaches for gastric cancer-Korean experience.Systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic and open gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer.Outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for early gastric cancer are comparable with those for open surgery: analysis of 1,013 minimally invasive surgeries at a single institution.A meta-analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer.Current status of management of malignant disease: current management of gastric cancer.Postoperative follow-up programs improve survival in curatively resected gastric and junctional cancer patients: a propensity score matched analysis.Recent evolution of surgical treatment for gastric cancer in Korea.Long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with suprapancreatic nodal dissection for clinical stage I gastric cancer: a multicenter phase II trial (JCOG0703).A prospective randomized study comparing open versus laparoscopy-assisted D2 radical gastrectomy in advanced gastric cancer.Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: comparison of short-term surgical outcomes.Follow-up after curative resection for gastric cancer: Is it time to tailor it?A meta-analysis of prospective randomized trials comparing minimally invasive and open distal gastrectomy for cancer.Long-term oncologic outcomes of 714 consecutive laparoscopic gastrectomies for gastric cancer: results from the 7-year experience of a single institute.Minimally invasive surgery for serosa-positive gastric cancer (pT4a) in patients with preoperative diagnosis of cancer without serosal invasion.Early results of a modified splenic hilar lymphadenectomy in laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy for gastric cancer with stage cT1-2: a case-control study.Laparoscopy-assisted resection of proximal gastric cancer: is less than all more or less complete, or is all more, nonetheless?Laparoscopic Reinforcement Suture (LARS) on Staple Line of Duodenal Stump Using Barbed Suture in Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: a Prospective Single Arm Phase II Study.Impact of splenic hilar lymph node metastasis on prognosis in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

P2860

Q26824863-16543746-1653-4AFB-8E9B-B61F6C08510A Q26828506-5A23ED1C-F76F-4391-AC4D-1DC31A2CE564 Q28071859-B880E728-791E-4E3F-B499-F79F18550A4E Q34981102-28E9D2FD-0131-4C3C-81AE-3EA2C689ADC7 Q35102654-4F1B1296-AF81-445F-B76E-B851A1C46ADA Q35112857-AA1F43B3-D2F4-40DE-B4E0-5A46B6EE585E Q35481575-AE4CE1CE-51FE-4AD9-A38D-0900785F0AF6 Q35717922-C74B9D3D-0A8C-4B61-876D-AEE6624B8D95 Q35783616-69148B06-A37A-4BD3-85E4-2F9B3220DC23 Q35871578-EE8D3275-0C00-4923-9F09-2CE094F631D3 Q35871583-D0937C80-E1BF-4B26-B389-043D78141202 Q35961219-0B4AA88E-45B5-4B63-BBB4-7F16EE5B206E Q36153909-B47033AC-03F6-4973-8579-A3666476C230 Q36592937-83DE3F8D-0C74-4680-8B18-ECB802C960D7 Q36770216-FF274C1B-143E-4EAC-9C7F-E3BF4578BA4D Q37057237-4B863E6D-8B92-4498-8735-17F7B5715B06 Q37205149-22B90B4B-0D4A-4EBB-9774-2FE03A14601E Q37381885-EE091AF3-8731-488C-87CC-2FA99BEE03D8 Q37399184-7A195F5A-A7EF-4055-BE51-359B6C8EB994 Q37660731-A5BEFF71-848E-4A83-B451-979D9BEAD38B Q37821266-7C387EB6-19A0-4F23-B1A7-71E4E8EA92F0 Q37863058-D846EADD-3E87-42A0-9189-FF13F7BBFFB4 Q38027069-465C3E62-0B24-4209-8F28-424F23DE53F2 Q38127475-5915EA31-4677-48F8-9628-4A040D365C2F Q38165022-26592BBB-F0DB-4358-883A-40E983E92ABF Q38208757-21E5E32D-1E04-4DCE-8B03-56E67F623D4C Q38319561-3E2E0B13-B504-4756-A845-1B4487C4BA7E Q38663129-BB6276A1-3858-4AD5-AB1F-3EA8B4B9A479 Q38872369-108EF3F3-5D1D-42B1-996A-07F4AAAF6329 Q39017599-EC214D94-6699-4472-BD1B-5E09D7DAC49D Q40311495-54833DC8-E6C5-474E-A34C-8993FCBDE498 Q41550390-55BFC577-2FB1-4ABE-9EDC-A50B9CBE818D Q42347265-E915136C-248F-4B70-B9EB-C95929E463F3 Q42604258-BA45E71B-E143-4C39-ABC7-390B2FB88704 Q42610725-469329A5-1639-4DD9-82B7-EA2ED11DF2C0 Q43524563-6000196E-5564-46AB-89A6-8C985FE5DCAE Q43641129-0602B5C2-A1AE-40A6-B116-C8BFD10B9AA2 Q44662039-08EE7DE2-FAB3-4F26-9B86-F7D4DF631CB9 Q47111377-ACAFB47D-3D97-4316-978C-022D4C3C10BF Q47143606-D7EF1A42-9303-4180-9A5C-065A3504C6F4

P2860

Recurrence following laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a multicenter retrospective analysis of 1,417 patients.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q42648870

description

2010 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2010年の論文

@ja

2010年学术文章

@wuu

2010年学术文章

@zh-cn

2010年学术文章

@zh-hans

2010年学术文章

@zh-my

2010年学术文章

@zh-sg

2010年學術文章

@yue

2010年學術文章

@zh

2010年學術文章

@zh-hant

name

Recurrence following laparosco ...... ve analysis of 1,417 patients.

@en

Recurrence following laparosco ...... ve analysis of 1,417 patients.

@nl

type

label

Recurrence following laparosco ...... ve analysis of 1,417 patients.

@en

Recurrence following laparosco ...... ve analysis of 1,417 patients.

@nl

prefLabel

Recurrence following laparosco ...... ve analysis of 1,417 patients.

@en

Recurrence following laparosco ...... ve analysis of 1,417 patients.

@nl

P1433

Q42648870-EC5C323A-2C85-410F-8D92-CA11698485B9

P1476

Q42648870-EE8BA908-2E1C-4C1D-8790-1652968274A5

P2093

Q42648870-26AB96FB-A026-46CA-9AB1-92B5A75372A8

Q42648870-2D7A7FB8-D328-4BE3-8342-960B0B7306B2

Q42648870-6FF7DF89-6C08-4E0A-BDF5-DEA178BC25EE

Q42648870-718AD8D6-44B2-47C0-A924-97EE2602D4DA

Q42648870-7224D11B-D6D4-45E3-BAAC-B3B42FF190A5

Q42648870-86873EF9-40CA-46BE-8654-F02B8428EC9A

Q42648870-9B471406-02DB-472D-91CE-1CA8EF1521D1

Q42648870-CA5EA9EC-D27F-4C07-8FC0-C7594458CF25

Q42648870-DAAEEE4D-B1F6-4C36-A9F6-3CF393A46030

Q42648870-EDE947C8-22D7-4100-B04E-B4F659ECFC3F

P2888

Q42648870-41941120-F608-4DEE-A8F6-37AE6D1DEDDB

P304

Q42648870-93160E65-BC35-4F58-B2B1-3076C3E26ECE

P31

Q42648870-AD60761E-8B82-4B39-8F10-70AE53387996

P356

Q42648870-027F0EF6-1E8A-43E7-B50C-036CFCD97622

P433

Q42648870-795B8D9E-6E5F-4D17-B1C9-1446C72EFDB4

P478

Q42648870-908FBECB-9693-4A5C-A148-B140BAC3382C

P50

Q42648870-99DBDF84-5590-4457-875B-8D8379D95AD5

P577

Q42648870-180708FC-87C0-4DCE-A2EC-FBB5673B6642

P6179

Q42648870-2C491E67-24B8-4E99-AB2D-5E3C4299E564

P698

Q42648870-4F923657-610E-4CBD-83E6-2FD16DE0DB0F

P921

Q42648870-005F6B11-33D4-4445-8F37-4016CFCE8F10

Q42648870-40FA1C2B-C73B-4E07-9CC6-863498725423

Q42648870-E9458AE4-925F-4278-B674-3079FA0F4C98

P356

S10434-010-0932-4

P1433

Annals of Surgical Oncology

P1476

Recurrence following laparosco ...... ive analysis of 1,417 patients

@en

P2093

Gyu Seok Cho

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Hyuk-Joon Lee

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Hyung-Ho Kim

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Jyewon Song

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Korean Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (KLASS) Group

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Kyo Young Song

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Min-Chan Kim

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Sang-Uk Han

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Seung Wan Ryu

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Wook Kim

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2888

s10434-010-0932-4

P304

1777-1786

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1245/S10434-010-0932-4

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

7

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

17

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

P577

2010-02-12T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P6179

1051971677

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

20151217

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P921

multicenter trial