Evaluating alternative systems of peer review: a large-scale agent-based modelling approach to scientific publication.

about

A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review Factors influencing the scientific performance of Momentum grant holders: an evaluation of the first 117 research groups The state of the art in peer review

P2860

Q33269085-1A5B29FF-CE63-4715-93C5-4FF79E437CE4 Q57179406-1FE632DF-3EBC-4778-92E6-002265FDBE8B Q57554278-A3BA230B-CF1D-4485-86CF-6C2EC0ACC3C9

P2860

Evaluating alternative systems of peer review: a large-scale agent-based modelling approach to scientific publication.

Item

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q42698230

description

2017 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2017年の論文

@ja

2017年論文

@yue

2017年論文

@zh-hant

2017年論文

@zh-hk

2017年論文

@zh-mo

2017年論文

@zh-tw

2017年论文

@wuu

2017年论文

@zh

2017年论文

@zh-cn

name

Evaluating alternative systems ...... ach to scientific publication.

@en

Evaluating alternative systems ...... ach to scientific publication.

@nl

type

Item

label

Evaluating alternative systems ...... ach to scientific publication.

@en

Evaluating alternative systems ...... ach to scientific publication.

@nl

prefLabel

Evaluating alternative systems ...... ach to scientific publication.

@en

Evaluating alternative systems ...... ach to scientific publication.

@nl

P1476

Evaluating alternative systems ...... ach to scientific publication.

@en

P2093

Ludovic Trinquart

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Michail Kovanis

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Who's Afraid of Peer Review?

Post-publication peer review: opening up scientific conversation

Multi-stage open peer review: scientific evaluation integrating the strengths of traditional peer review with the virtues of transparency and self-regulation

Measuring the effectiveness of scientific gatekeeping

Emerging trends in peer review-a survey

Peer review for biomedical publications: we can improve the system

Agent-based modeling: methods and techniques for simulating human systems.

Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers' recommendations: a randomised trial

The Global Burden of Journal Peer Review in the Biomedical Literature: Strong Imbalance in the Collective Enterprise

Let’s make peer review scientific

P2888

s11192-017-2375-1

P304

651-671

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1007/S11192-017-2375-1

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P4510

crowdsourcing

P478

113

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Philippe Ravaud

Raphaël Porcher

P577

2017-04-03T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P6179

1084519262

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

29056795

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P932

5629248

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Evaluating alternative systems of peer review: a large-scale agent-based modelling approach to scientific publication.

about

P2860

P2860

Evaluating alternative systems of peer review: a large-scale agent-based modelling approach to scientific publication.

description

name

type

label

prefLabel

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P2888

P304

P31

P356

P433

P4510

P478

P50

P577

P6179

P698

P932

P356

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P2888

P304

P31

P356

P433

P4510

P478

P50

P577

P6179

P698

P932