3D versus 2D Systematic Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsy: Higher Cancer Detection Rate in Clinical Practice.
about
MRI-targeted biopsies versus systematic transrectal ultrasound guided biopsies for the diagnosis of localized prostate cancer in biopsy naïve men.3D Navigo™ versus TRUS-guided prostate biopsy in prostate cancer detection.Results of a comparative analysis of magnetic resonance imaging-targeted versus three-dimensional transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsies: Size does matter.Evaluating the utility of intraprocedural 3D TRUS image information in guiding registration for displacement compensation during prostate biopsy.[Ultrasonography of the prostate gland : From B‑image through multiparametric ultrasound to targeted biopsy].
P2860
3D versus 2D Systematic Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsy: Higher Cancer Detection Rate in Clinical Practice.
description
2013 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2013年の論文
@ja
2013年論文
@yue
2013年論文
@zh-hant
2013年論文
@zh-hk
2013年論文
@zh-mo
2013年論文
@zh-tw
2013年论文
@wuu
2013年论文
@zh
2013年论文
@zh-cn
name
3D versus 2D Systematic Transr ...... ion Rate in Clinical Practice.
@en
3D versus 2D Systematic Transr ...... ion Rate in Clinical Practice.
@nl
type
label
3D versus 2D Systematic Transr ...... ion Rate in Clinical Practice.
@en
3D versus 2D Systematic Transr ...... ion Rate in Clinical Practice.
@nl
prefLabel
3D versus 2D Systematic Transr ...... ion Rate in Clinical Practice.
@en
3D versus 2D Systematic Transr ...... ion Rate in Clinical Practice.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P356
P1433
P1476
3D versus 2D Systematic Transr ...... ion Rate in Clinical Practice.
@en
P2093
Alexandre Peltier
Eric Hawaux
Fouad Aoun
Fouad El-Khoury
Krishna Narahari
Ksenija Limani
Nicolas Sirtaine
Roland van Velthoven
P2860
P304
P356
10.1155/2013/783243
P577
2013-11-17T00:00:00Z