Proposed new deprivation index. Has major flaws in its derivation and validation.
about
A comparison of three methods of setting prescribing budgets, using data derived from defined daily dose analyses of historic patterns of use.Influences of practice characteristics on prescribing in fundholding and non-fundholding general practices: an observational study.Alterations in prescribing by general practitioner fundholders: an observational study.
P2860
Proposed new deprivation index. Has major flaws in its derivation and validation.
description
1995 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
1995年の論文
@ja
1995年論文
@yue
1995年論文
@zh-hant
1995年論文
@zh-hk
1995年論文
@zh-mo
1995年論文
@zh-tw
1995年论文
@wuu
1995年论文
@zh
1995年论文
@zh-cn
name
Proposed new deprivation index. Has major flaws in its derivation and validation.
@en
Proposed new deprivation index. Has major flaws in its derivation and validation.
@nl
type
label
Proposed new deprivation index. Has major flaws in its derivation and validation.
@en
Proposed new deprivation index. Has major flaws in its derivation and validation.
@nl
prefLabel
Proposed new deprivation index. Has major flaws in its derivation and validation.
@en
Proposed new deprivation index. Has major flaws in its derivation and validation.
@nl
P2093
P1433
P1476
Proposed new deprivation index. Has major flaws in its derivation and validation.
@en
P2093
P2860
P304
P356
10.1136/BMJ.310.6986.1067C
P407
P577
1995-04-01T00:00:00Z