A comparative study of the MATRICS and IntegNeuro cognitive assessment batteries.
about
International Study to Predict Optimized Treatment for Depression (iSPOT-D), a randomized clinical trial: rationale and protocol.Cognitive and neuroplasticity mechanisms by which congenital or early blindness may confer a protective effect against schizophrenia.A quantitative meta-analysis of neurocognitive functioning in posttraumatic stress disorder.Is the Alzheimer's disease cortical thickness signature a biological marker for memory?Neuropsychological profile in adult schizophrenia measured with the CMINDSFactor structure of the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) in schizophrenia.Varenicline improves motor and cognitive symptoms in early Huntington's disease.The robust reliability of neuropsychological measures: meta-analyses of test-retest correlations.Reliability and validity of a self-administered tool for online neuropsychological testing: The Amsterdam Cognition Scan.Neurocognitive predictors of performance-based functional capacity in bipolar disorder.Cognitive deficits characterization using the CogState Research Battery in first-episode psychosis patients.Cognitive reserve is not associated with improved performance in all cognitive domains.Assessing cognition in schizophrenia: a comparison of clinician and computerized test administration.Possible Medication-Resistant Deficits in Adult ADHD.The interdependence of subtype and severity: contributions of clinical and neuropsychological features to melancholia and non-melancholia in an outpatient sample.Conversion disorder in children and adolescents: a disorder of cognitive control.Online Self-Administered Cognitive Testing Using the Amsterdam Cognition Scan: Establishing Psychometric Properties and Normative Data.
P2860
Q30433255-07CE2CE4-31FB-4F94-8C43-09C7BBF7CAEEQ30458900-DAAA8302-C4C5-458C-9341-D8FFC96AE14DQ34944984-BB5D37A8-27C6-4FE7-A36E-7D7CBC3DCC18Q36348325-622C01F1-E0F5-4069-96D8-D2166877A63EQ36408176-DE1C2D9A-D712-4F2C-A162-BE5807D71914Q37088924-D70667F9-9D82-40BA-9B25-EA60B566E13AQ37279618-AE40A156-F8FB-4505-8DCC-AE403521AC92Q38135484-26917F9E-99E4-4873-BD28-F2731AE1F410Q38663574-0A27D797-A9CB-4B5E-B711-5AF451D20619Q39229708-33205F61-8DAB-4D24-813F-A70DF34194AFQ47550663-E097A3B4-8723-497F-A648-E2D4E57A12E9Q47737140-EB9233A4-9F7D-4B4E-8CA1-7473C41927F4Q48005042-DF0078D2-1B98-4B7F-8F66-C8A907F825B7Q48692237-57B87754-82DB-4FBC-9268-A6035C63B20FQ48738715-98A9AE82-B283-405C-B001-AEAEAC83904CQ50697205-456BDE7A-9012-461C-9DED-3F79BF1B225FQ55347233-F7DA510F-74CE-40FF-BB91-A6C6CEACA221
P2860
A comparative study of the MATRICS and IntegNeuro cognitive assessment batteries.
description
2010 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2010年の論文
@ja
2010年学术文章
@wuu
2010年学术文章
@zh
2010年学术文章
@zh-cn
2010年学术文章
@zh-hans
2010年学术文章
@zh-my
2010年学术文章
@zh-sg
2010年學術文章
@yue
2010年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
A comparative study of the MATRICS and IntegNeuro cognitive assessment batteries.
@en
A comparative study of the MATRICS and IntegNeuro cognitive assessment batteries.
@nl
type
label
A comparative study of the MATRICS and IntegNeuro cognitive assessment batteries.
@en
A comparative study of the MATRICS and IntegNeuro cognitive assessment batteries.
@nl
prefLabel
A comparative study of the MATRICS and IntegNeuro cognitive assessment batteries.
@en
A comparative study of the MATRICS and IntegNeuro cognitive assessment batteries.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P1476
A comparative study of the MATRICS and IntegNeuro cognitive assessment batteries
@en
P2093
Adam Savitz
Anne-Marie Donovan-Lepore
Danielle Hawthorne
Gersham Dent
Igor Malinovsky
Judith Jaeger
Sandra M Wilkniss
Sarah Carson
Shane Raines
Stephanie Marcello
P2860
P304
P356
10.1080/13803391003596496
P577
2010-05-07T00:00:00Z