about
Female-biased expression of long non-coding RNAs in domains that escape X-inactivation in mouseDynamic α-helices: Conformations that do not conformIntrinsic disorder explains diverse nuclear roles of chromatin remodeling proteinsNonallelic transvection of multiple imprinted loci is organized by the H19 imprinting control region during germline developmentDisordered proteins and network disorder in network descriptions of protein structure, dynamics and function: hypotheses and a comprehensive review.Circular chromosome conformation capture (4C) uncovers extensive networks of epigenetically regulated intra- and interchromosomal interactions.Large-scale functional organization of long-range chromatin interaction networksDNase I-hypersensitive exons colocalize with promoters and distal regulatory elements.High resolution mapping of enhancer-promoter interactions.Spirulina nitrate-assimilating enzymes (NR, NiR, GS) have higher specific activities and are more stable than those of rice.Did the modulation of expression noise shape the evolution of three dimensional genome organizations in eukaryotes?GASCO: genetic algorithm simulation for codon optimization.A whole genome analysis of 5' regulatory regions of human genes for putative cis-acting modulators of nucleosome positioning.Systems properties of proteins encoded by imprinted genes.Evolutionarily conserved and conformationally constrained short peptides might serve as DNA recognition elements in intrinsically disordered regions.ExPrimer: to design primers from exon--exon junctions.Structural assessment of glycyl mutations in invariantly conserved motifs.Intrinsic unstructuredness and abundance of PEST motifs in eukaryotic proteomesConformational flexibility may explain multiple cellular roles of PEST motifsBiased visibility in Hi-C datasets marks dynamically regulated condensed and decondensed chromatin states genome-wideEvolutionary Loss of Genomic Proximity to Conserved Noncoding Elements Impacted the Gene Expression Dynamics During Mammalian Brain DevelopmentDoes genome surveillance explain the global discrepancy between binding and effect of chromatin factors?
P50
Q21267207-C0BECE29-958D-4791-B06C-8AA308A0BA92Q22061744-01307593-196B-453F-947D-CCCE8BD3366FQ22061745-87F66102-1973-4ED9-99DC-306C6CAFCD0FQ28265526-D9862C80-0C96-4BFF-9518-93B74ACA7D78Q30408830-06EE8A37-1F4D-4DE1-ACE9-925328BD15FCQ33260024-6E880C98-8E08-49CE-AB8E-3E94F1446C28Q34275017-2C9F8C6D-E676-4416-A7D3-FCA43B4DECF0Q34352768-8742E645-B7E2-4580-A9E5-DA135F3E98E2Q35630659-21D8FF85-0A1E-488D-A3A8-A6C4FED20BCBQ42135299-EC920E7E-5653-48EC-97E5-30A79554FA60Q42176092-68C2229C-B1C7-4429-9C57-9BD204800415Q47290780-3E90B19E-144C-4CF6-9112-29886EF89AC2Q48081316-E4AAE6FA-C3AC-48A8-AFDE-BAE90A7522BDQ50302807-437AAEEB-ABD8-4FF1-AA1A-9E11B22DFEEEQ51099642-11132DC8-B402-4C0E-91D4-2774C2256981Q51978386-5C83A911-8710-4B5A-B4D8-4A5F3FBB46CBQ54438227-018A7ED2-A525-418B-9C92-70B8B2D1D0F6Q81507965-972C42B6-55D0-416C-AC4A-8AC7C3BAE6EDQ82627881-18E49007-764A-4786-B915-6596958A528BQ89842407-D3EF072C-8E96-4F3E-97ED-331540B42D78Q91842299-27686475-83C4-40C0-A892-E1603FCCBF02Q92596671-8084CC2C-A560-4B54-9CEA-78ED8792B1EF
P50
description
researcher
@en
wetenschapper
@nl
հետազոտող
@hy
name
Kuljeet Sandhu
@ast
Kuljeet Sandhu
@en
Kuljeet Sandhu
@es
Kuljeet Sandhu
@nl
Kuljeet Sandhu
@sl
type
label
Kuljeet Sandhu
@ast
Kuljeet Sandhu
@en
Kuljeet Sandhu
@es
Kuljeet Sandhu
@nl
Kuljeet Sandhu
@sl
prefLabel
Kuljeet Sandhu
@ast
Kuljeet Sandhu
@en
Kuljeet Sandhu
@es
Kuljeet Sandhu
@nl
Kuljeet Sandhu
@sl
P106
P31
P496
0000-0001-7632-6339