Comparison of Southern transfer hybridization and dot filter hybridization for detection of cervical human papillomavirus infection with types 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, and 35.
about
Accuracy and interlaboratory reliability of human papillomavirus DNA testing by hybrid capture.Detection of human papillomavirus infection in diseased and nondiseased sites of the respiratory tract in recurrent respiratory papillomatosis patients by DNA hybridization.Comparison of ViraPap, Southern hybridization, and polymerase chain reaction methods for human papillomavirus identification in an epidemiological investigation of cervical cancer.Cervical cancer: developments in screening and evaluation of the abnormal Pap smearEvaluation of two commercially available DNA tests for detection of human papillomavirus.Comparison of dot filter hybridization, Southern transfer hybridization, and polymerase chain reaction amplification for diagnosis of anal human papillomavirus infection.Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and human papillomavirus infection among Senegalese women seropositive for HIV-1 or HIV-2 or seronegative for HIV.
P2860
Q30452566-0ACBDDB8-A5E3-4FF3-B8D5-795D36CD5E62Q31160496-F7C7F258-3242-4BCB-AD1B-05C6E66CAE9DQ33189224-A115A254-99FD-4A78-97CD-4356FF5B0A1CQ34189635-DBBD450B-C496-47D3-9908-A1F1779DCE29Q36624766-066AB99A-9666-4F1E-8955-939715612731Q37084174-05BA5D4A-31B2-4331-A6A3-03A10980DB84Q39443055-4F1B5BC2-14C3-4171-97B1-3C70EA54090E
P2860
Comparison of Southern transfer hybridization and dot filter hybridization for detection of cervical human papillomavirus infection with types 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, and 35.
description
1990 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
1990年の論文
@ja
1990年学术文章
@wuu
1990年学术文章
@zh
1990年学术文章
@zh-cn
1990年学术文章
@zh-hans
1990年学术文章
@zh-my
1990年学术文章
@zh-sg
1990年學術文章
@yue
1990年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Comparison of Southern transfe ...... 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, and 35.
@en
Comparison of Southern transfe ...... 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, and 35.
@nl
type
label
Comparison of Southern transfe ...... 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, and 35.
@en
Comparison of Southern transfe ...... 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, and 35.
@nl
prefLabel
Comparison of Southern transfe ...... 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, and 35.
@en
Comparison of Southern transfe ...... 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, and 35.
@nl
P2093
P356
P1476
Comparison of Southern transfe ...... 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, and 35.
@en
P2093
Critchlow CW
Galloway DA
Koutsky LA
McElhose PE
Pendras SJ
Peterson ML
Stevens CE
P304
P356
10.1093/AJCP/94.5.561
P407
P577
1990-11-01T00:00:00Z