Comparison of three bacterial detection methods under routine conditions.
about
Diagnostic methods for platelet bacteria screening: current status and developmentsImplementation of Bacterial Detection Methods into Blood Donor Screening - Overview of Different Technologies.Novel flow cytometric screening method for bacterial contamination of red blood cells: a proof-of-principle evaluation.Routine bacterial screening of platelet concentrates by flow cytometry and its impact on product safety and supply.The Pan Genera Detection immunoassay: a novel point-of-issue method for detection of bacterial contamination in platelet concentratesPlatelet bacterial contamination: assessing progress and identifying quandaries in a rapidly evolving field.Detection of bacterial contamination in platelet concentrates by a sensitive flow cytometric assay (BactiFlow): a multicentre validation study.Validation of an alternative microbiological method for tissue products.Oxygen measurements in platelet fluids - a new non-invasive method to detect bacterial contaminations in platelets.Extension of platelet shelf life from 4 to 5 days by implementation of a new screening strategy in Germany.Sterilization of platelet concentrates at production scale by irradiation with short-wave ultraviolet light.The residual risk of sepsis: modeling the effect of concentration on bacterial detection in two-bottle culture systems and an estimation of false-negative culture rates.Culture-based bacterial detection systems for platelets: the effect of time prior to sampling and duration of incubation required for detection with aerobic culture.Bacterial screening by flow cytometry offers potential for extension of platelet storage: results of 14 months of active surveillance.Inter-laboratory comparison of different rapid methods for the detection of bacterial contamination in platelet concentrates.
P2860
Q27021920-2E72C369-4EC7-40C0-B389-FE2D7B350FFDQ38667376-6F8DE6D7-E322-4367-B813-77A2B51CEE46Q41391343-5B3D0352-BA6B-435E-81A1-60BEBD8878B7Q41621121-89B0189A-FC22-4BC7-B62B-5E8E3DD0C807Q42411067-FE49B1B6-CA90-4C2B-8584-146A56C53316Q44410070-8B9B9AA3-EB7D-43F0-A967-9EB1CDA22662Q44495947-681A67F5-3E5B-469C-B3B4-9BE9EAB48BC0Q50471897-F7D53E63-0EA9-406F-8CD8-499BECCF69BDQ50514107-CBFCBB2C-1B33-49DE-884E-E08BFA3FED72Q50539111-04040418-8383-4C4E-8D25-CF2197AEE02FQ50606722-5AC51621-BC3C-40C8-A12D-AC533D5238EDQ50686480-67A88698-EBCD-4AD3-9CA9-F50055424DDAQ50879136-0F73AF37-2B45-4783-B348-3DAE255FA5E8Q51609243-57C8C1FE-762E-4F0D-807E-FA0D519AEF75Q54346720-DAC699F8-C109-4D3A-9FC8-F43C1B86776D
P2860
Comparison of three bacterial detection methods under routine conditions.
description
2007 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2007年の論文
@ja
2007年学术文章
@wuu
2007年学术文章
@zh
2007年学术文章
@zh-cn
2007年学术文章
@zh-hans
2007年学术文章
@zh-my
2007年学术文章
@zh-sg
2007年學術文章
@yue
2007年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Comparison of three bacterial detection methods under routine conditions.
@en
Comparison of three bacterial detection methods under routine conditions.
@nl
type
label
Comparison of three bacterial detection methods under routine conditions.
@en
Comparison of three bacterial detection methods under routine conditions.
@nl
prefLabel
Comparison of three bacterial detection methods under routine conditions.
@en
Comparison of three bacterial detection methods under routine conditions.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P1433
P1476
Comparison of three bacterial detection methods under routine conditions
@en
P2093
Burkhart J
Deitenbeck R
Karakassopoulos A
Seifried E
Walther-Wenke G
Weinauer F
P2860
P356
10.1111/J.1423-0410.2006.00850.X
P577
2007-01-01T00:00:00Z