Assessing peer review by gauging the fate of rejected manuscripts: the case of the Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation.
about
Establishing Sensible and Practical Guidelines for Desk Rejections.Journal peer review: a bar or bridge? An analysis of a paper's revision history and turnaround time, and the effect on citation.Insurance Companies Fighting the Peer Review Empire without any Validity: the Case for Addiction and Pain Modalities in the face of an American Drug EpidemicFactors influencing the scientific performance of Momentum grant holders: an evaluation of the first 117 research groups
P2860
Assessing peer review by gauging the fate of rejected manuscripts: the case of the Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation.
description
2017 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2017年の論文
@ja
2017年学术文章
@wuu
2017年学术文章
@zh-cn
2017年学术文章
@zh-hans
2017年学术文章
@zh-my
2017年学术文章
@zh-sg
2017年學術文章
@yue
2017年學術文章
@zh
2017年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Assessing peer review by gaugi ...... cieties and Social Simulation.
@en
Assessing peer review by gaugi ...... cieties and Social Simulation.
@nl
type
label
Assessing peer review by gaugi ...... cieties and Social Simulation.
@en
Assessing peer review by gaugi ...... cieties and Social Simulation.
@nl
prefLabel
Assessing peer review by gaugi ...... cieties and Social Simulation.
@en
Assessing peer review by gaugi ...... cieties and Social Simulation.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P1433
P1476
Assessing peer review by gaugi ...... cieties and Social Simulation.
@en
P2093
Flaminio Squazzoni
Francisco Grimaldo
Niccolò Casnici
Nigel Gilbert
Pierpaolo Dondio
P2860
P2888
P304
P356
10.1007/S11192-017-2241-1
P577
2017-03-03T00:00:00Z
P6179
1084030114