Response to are observational studies more informative than randomized controlled trials in hypertension? Con side of the argument.
about
P2860
Response to are observational studies more informative than randomized controlled trials in hypertension? Con side of the argument.
description
2013 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2013年の論文
@ja
2013年学术文章
@wuu
2013年学术文章
@zh
2013年学术文章
@zh-cn
2013年学术文章
@zh-hans
2013年学术文章
@zh-my
2013年学术文章
@zh-sg
2013年學術文章
@yue
2013年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Response to are observational ...... ion? Con side of the argument.
@en
Response to are observational ...... ion? Con side of the argument.
@nl
type
label
Response to are observational ...... ion? Con side of the argument.
@en
Response to are observational ...... ion? Con side of the argument.
@nl
prefLabel
Response to are observational ...... ion? Con side of the argument.
@en
Response to are observational ...... ion? Con side of the argument.
@nl
P1433
P1476
Response to are observational ...... sion? Con side of the argument
@en
P2093
Paolo Verdecchia
P356
10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.113.00727
P407
P577
2013-09-01T00:00:00Z