A benchmarking method to evaluate the accuracy of a commercial proton monte carlo pencil beam scanning treatment planning system.
about
A comparison of two pencil beam scanning treatment planning systems for proton therapy.Quantifying the effect of air gap, depth, and range shifter thickness on TPS dosimetric accuracy in superficial PBS proton therapy.Advanced proton beam dosimetry part II: Monte Carlo vs. pencil beam-based planning for lung cancer.Advanced Proton Beam Dosimetry Part I: review and performance evaluation of dose calculation algorithms.Advances in the use of motion management and image guidance in radiation therapy treatment for lung cancer
P2860
A benchmarking method to evaluate the accuracy of a commercial proton monte carlo pencil beam scanning treatment planning system.
description
2017 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2017年の論文
@ja
2017年学术文章
@wuu
2017年学术文章
@zh
2017年学术文章
@zh-cn
2017年学术文章
@zh-hans
2017年学术文章
@zh-my
2017年学术文章
@zh-sg
2017年學術文章
@yue
2017年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
A benchmarking method to evalu ...... ing treatment planning system.
@en
A benchmarking method to evalu ...... ing treatment planning system.
@nl
type
label
A benchmarking method to evalu ...... ing treatment planning system.
@en
A benchmarking method to evalu ...... ing treatment planning system.
@nl
prefLabel
A benchmarking method to evalu ...... ing treatment planning system.
@en
A benchmarking method to evalu ...... ing treatment planning system.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P356
P1476
A benchmarking method to evalu ...... ning treatment planning system
@en
P2093
Allen Barnett
Christopher Ainsley
James E McDonough
Jari Lindberg
John McGhee
Minglei Kang
Petri Hiltunen
Reynald Vanderstraeten
Sami Siljamaki
P2860
P356
10.1002/ACM2.12043
P577
2017-02-02T00:00:00Z