Survey non-response in the Netherlands: effects on prevalence estimates and associations.
about
Evaluation of non-response bias in a cohort study of World Trade Center terrorist attack survivorsThe Oslo Health Study: The impact of self-selection in a large, population-based surveyAssessment of participation bias in cohort studies: systematic review and meta-regression analysisThe long-term impact of physical and emotional trauma: the station nightclub fireMental health impact of the 2010 Haiti earthquake on the Miami Haitian population: A random-sample surveyIs interpregnancy interval associated with cardiovascular risk factors in later life? A cohort studyPersonalized contact strategies and predictors of time to survey completion: analysis of two sequential randomized trials.Social Exclusion Index-for Health Surveys (SEI-HS): a prospective nationwide study to extend and validate a multidimensional social exclusion questionnaireNon-response bias in physical activity trend estimates.Is income or employment a stronger predictor of smoking than education in economically less developed countries? A cross-sectional study in Hungary.A Community-Engaged Approach to Collecting Rural Health Surveillance Data.Estimation of Pap-test coverage in an area with an organised screening program: challenges for survey methodsSense of coherence and attrition during four-year follow-up in cohorts of permanent and non-permanent Finnish employees.Motives for (not) participating in a lifestyle intervention trial.HABITAT: A longitudinal multilevel study of physical activity change in mid-aged adultsInvestigation of relative risk estimates from studies of the same population with contrasting response rates and designs.Significantly higher rates of multiple and proximally located adenomas among patients with diabetes mellitus: A cross-sectional population-based studyNeighbourhood characteristics, social capital and self-rated health--a population-based survey in Sweden.A clinical trial alert tool to recruit large patient samples and assess selection bias in general practice research.Obesity, smoking, alcohol consumption and years lived with disability: a Sullivan life table approach.Estimating bias from loss to follow-up in a prospective cohort study of bicycle crash injuries.Psychosocial and organizational risk factors for doctor-certified sick leave: a prospective study of female health and social workers in NorwayResponse rates and response bias for 50 surveys of pediatriciansThe HUNT study: participation is associated with survival and depends on socioeconomic status, diseases and symptomsEstimating the burden of disease in chronic pain with and without neuropathic characteristics: does the choice between the EQ-5D and SF-6D matter?Attrition and generalizability in longitudinal studies: findings from a 15-year population-based study and a Monte Carlo simulation study.Educational differences in cigarette smoking among adult population in Estonia, 1990-2010: does the trend fit the model of tobacco epidemic?Ascertaining the size of the symptom iceberg in a UK-wide community-based survey.Patterns of objectively measured physical activity in normal weight, overweight, and obese individuals (20-85 years): a cross-sectional study.The sixth survey of the Tromso Study (Tromso 6) in 2007-08: collaborative research in the interface between clinical medicine and epidemiology: study objectives, design, data collection procedures, and attendance in a multipurpose population-based hRandom sample community-based health surveys: does the effort to reach participants matter?Psychological sequelae of the station nightclub fire: Comparing survivors with and without physical injuries using a mixed-methods analysisEffects of Physician Communication and Family Hardiness on Patient Medication Regimen Beliefs and Adherence.Adherence to the WHO's healthy diet indicator and overall cancer risk in the EPIC-NL cohort.Alcohol consumption, smoking and overweight as a burden for health care services utilization: a cross-sectional study in EstoniaParental food-related behaviors and family meal frequencies: associations in Norwegian dyads of parents and preadolescent children.Area deprivation and the prevalence of type 2 diabetes and obesity: analysis at the municipality level in Germany.The association between adverse life events and body weight change: results of a prospective cohort studyTobacco smoking surveillance: is quota sampling an efficient tool for monitoring national trends? A comparison with a random cross-sectional survey.Repeated attempts using different strategies are important for timely contact with study participants.
P2860
Q23921324-472384C8-A130-4DE6-A552-9853CD36D17BQ24794910-022A394D-A823-403B-8CF3-27D143D9BB10Q26769718-645571BA-89A4-46A4-A75F-5D90A73E3A38Q28389798-55FB6083-6A93-4476-91BB-230938AD69F7Q28602896-89CBCAAC-3FC1-4A21-84C1-56D831981DF8Q28660783-2DB722E3-794E-46F0-90FC-B4A5993CE9E7Q30405674-CE987D6A-B92A-404A-8183-38A8FDA38AD6Q30841762-698BDAE5-7587-4D6F-9894-16BE9B17FE5DQ30907609-A2D2B04D-91B8-4179-9B10-07BA86DB7D06Q30999713-035D65BA-7976-4B3B-9EB2-A469412D38CCQ31108158-5E28206F-C290-49FD-8A3C-7E342D47EC77Q33236901-EDDC9728-CAC0-4522-B22E-E25D5763D766Q33325806-CFDC7FB3-A45F-4B4F-98C8-20C1831FF8B0Q33327583-3C6D76A7-BEB1-4359-8475-F831F30476E2Q33415381-E9FA4B0A-06E0-4474-821E-FE8085638020Q33548157-529E4DF2-7991-44F5-92E1-EDE5CB823294Q33632980-999F5D71-FBE9-4A63-81BB-151EC94EA94FQ33724673-70ED4E9A-C4A3-410D-86C9-44F2FA92E944Q33820314-282BF0C7-86EE-471E-9A03-8C7C3A07CCA4Q33909579-58BC30C5-D8ED-4EA3-A7F6-065A94506454Q34239286-897D64B5-BDFF-40F1-AF28-0BB932D4FBC3Q34309343-FFF4B997-E746-4B02-BC7C-E698BB46B338Q34337164-04DE4805-2868-46FA-A4CC-0D39D8CAA2ECQ34414984-C4B310C1-E6C7-46B5-BF1C-64178435C96FQ34451586-7C784191-51EC-4B8A-BF0F-2425E54BA7C4Q34459595-A3FCE714-B78B-491A-8A57-00926F2CA7BAQ34485119-B3463BAB-5E6D-4DE1-9435-8F8D2D539E7CQ34485486-FADBC8C6-9418-4ADD-9F18-26DAFCA770D3Q34544653-13B150AA-AD50-4B26-99AC-7AF9E5473B7FQ34557834-A038500E-B4AE-4185-9127-59AB5CF2840EQ34707584-520C26E5-8CB2-41C6-BE92-2F9AC53684CAQ34764656-2A1366EB-23B4-4E0F-84E9-5126A88DA482Q34938270-159952FF-3567-489E-8E87-C2C29559204DQ34947201-50468569-BFA6-44A6-B7FD-61193F90DE4BQ34966480-756BC1DE-CF3B-4CE2-9051-DD2297EC9416Q34981940-67EDCA0B-B5E9-4E20-A929-56130FC6EEE7Q34995204-D6B53396-A0CE-4604-A87A-7D14B76D42B5Q35017274-AAB63540-1113-4587-865D-654395D53F24Q35032552-34713E83-5018-4B42-A859-2DB7F8029A45Q35050588-3CD1FAF1-C2DB-48CD-A91A-6CF5B086F95E
P2860
Survey non-response in the Netherlands: effects on prevalence estimates and associations.
description
2003 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2003年の論文
@ja
2003年学术文章
@wuu
2003年学术文章
@zh
2003年学术文章
@zh-cn
2003年学术文章
@zh-hans
2003年学术文章
@zh-my
2003年学术文章
@zh-sg
2003年學術文章
@yue
2003年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Survey non-response in the Netherlands: effects on prevalence estimates and associations.
@en
Survey non-response in the Netherlands: effects on prevalence estimates and associations.
@nl
type
label
Survey non-response in the Netherlands: effects on prevalence estimates and associations.
@en
Survey non-response in the Netherlands: effects on prevalence estimates and associations.
@nl
prefLabel
Survey non-response in the Netherlands: effects on prevalence estimates and associations.
@en
Survey non-response in the Netherlands: effects on prevalence estimates and associations.
@nl
P2093
P1476
Survey non-response in the Netherlands: effects on prevalence estimates and associations.
@en
P2093
A Jeanne M Van Loon
H Susan J Picavet
Marja Tijhuis
Paul G Surtees
P304
P356
10.1016/S1047-2797(02)00257-0
P50
P577
2003-02-01T00:00:00Z