Basal follicle-stimulating hormone level is a better predictor of in vitro fertilization performance than age.
about
Antimüllerian hormone as a predictor of natural fecundability in women aged 30-42 yearsDifferent ovarian stimulation protocols for women with diminished ovarian reserveDehydroepiandrosterone as an adjunct to gonadotropins in infertile Indian women with premature ovarian aging: A pilot studyAntral follicle counting in predicting the retrieved oocyte number after ovarian hyperstimulationDetermination of the efficiency of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in the gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist-suppression cycle using the initial follicle count during gonadotropin stimulationHigh FSH:LH ratio and low LH levels in basal cycle day 3: impact on follicular development and IVF outcomeAntral follicle assessment as a tool for predicting outcome in IVF--is it a better predictor than age and FSH?Aging and reproductive potential in women.Antral follice counts (AFC) predict ovarian response and pregnancy outcomes in oocyte donation cyclesEvaluation and treatment of low responders in assisted reproductive technology: a challenge to meet.Ovarian function and cigarette smokingAssisted hatching and intracytoplasmic sperm injection are not associated with improved outcomes in assisted reproduction cycles for diminished ovarian reserve: an analysis of cycles in the United States from 2004 to 2011.When is clomiphene or gonadotropin intrauterine insemination futile? Results of the Fast Track and Standard Treatment Trial and the Forty and Over Treatment Trial, two prospective randomized controlled trials.Body mass index impacts in vitro fertilization stimulationAnti-mullerian hormone as a predictive marker for the selection of women for oocyte in vitro maturation treatmentPredicting pregnancy in women undergoing in-vitro fertilization with basal serum follicle stimulating hormone levels between 10.0 and 11.9 IU/LPredictors of in vitro fertilization outcomes in women with highest follicle-stimulating hormone levels ≥ 12 IU/L: a prospective cohort studyThe value of human chorionic gonadotropin stimulation test in predicting ovarian response during in-vitro fertilization.Ovarian reserve testsPredictive value of age-specific FSH levels for IVF-ET outcome in women with normal ovarian function.Is ABO blood type associated with ovarian stimulation response in patients with diminished ovarian reserve?Does measuring early basal serum follicular luteinising [correction of lutinising] hormone assist in predicting in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcome?Maximum basal FSH predicts reproductive outcome better than cycle-specific basal FSH levels: waiting for a "better" month conveys limited retrieval benefitsSimple tools for assessment of ovarian reserve (OR): individual ovarian dimensions are reliable predictors of OR.Serum anti-müllerian hormone, follicle stimulating hormone and antral follicle count measurement cannot predict pregnancy rates in IVF/ICSI cycles.Decreased Ovarian Reserve Predicts Inexplicability of Recurrent Miscarriage? A Retrospective Analysis.Uterine vascularization and pregnancy outcome in patients undergoing intracytoplasmatic sperm injection: the role of nitric oxide.The practical implications of a raised serum FSH and age on the risk of IVF treatment cancellation due to a poor ovarian response.Ovarian reserve test with human menopausal gonadotropin as a predictor of in vitro fertilization outcome.The prognostic value of age and follicle-stimulating hormone levels in women over forty years of age undergoing in vitro fertilization.Impact of body mass index on in vitro fertilization outcomesThe number of embryos available for transfer predicts successful pregnancy outcome in women over 39 years with normal ovarian hormonal reserve testingMean ovarian diameter (MOD) as a predictor of poor ovarian response.Comparison of basal and clomiphene citrate induced FSH and inhibin B, ovarian volume and antral follicle counts as ovarian reserve tests and predictors of poor ovarian response in IVF.IVF performance of women who have fluctuating early follicular FSH levels.Single and repeated GnRH agonist stimulation tests compared with basal markers of ovarian reserve in the prediction of outcome in IVF.Prediction of pregnancy rate of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer in women aged 40 and over with basal uterine artery pulsatility indexDoes pretreatment with progestogen or oral contraceptive pills in low responders followed by the GnRHa flare protocol improve the outcome of IVF-ET?Cessation of low-dose gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist therapy followed by high-dose gonadotropin stimulation yields a favorable ovarian response in poor respondersIn vitro fertilization outcome according to age and follicle-stimulating hormone levels on cycle day 3
P2860
Q23910016-52168EF0-EDED-4EC3-87A7-DC58BD8D5E2EQ24634342-4D8A12D6-17EF-4BE4-AD94-249178A9A0D5Q26779878-44F55C21-9869-449D-9E5E-55480277C28BQ28345691-B61EA0C4-9619-4164-B1F9-1661ED259F16Q28361934-38F1E023-4584-45E1-BAF4-EAF3ED91BD38Q28362311-397E92AA-3C36-4796-9A30-B3E8BC9EB9ADQ28367011-738C3FCE-FB42-4534-A784-D00FAAA4454FQ33754806-0ED2EBC9-CB15-444B-957B-B704795BB9DAQ34070159-5C6CFFDD-E020-4CDE-A740-F2A7C6D20825Q34082122-4FEB9DB4-ECB0-45DA-96FC-4809D16F75D9Q34153740-2BD9852C-B46C-4D52-AE22-3AFEC009D0D6Q34288116-72004CC4-F433-4481-9F07-4ECF71019ABAQ34616182-E0C48F95-2B95-4C55-99F9-9F08D1B36BEAQ35005635-4F60B200-55DB-41E8-8D41-DEA3B703385DQ35171104-DE6951AE-5448-4239-8B55-5B8ED7970D0AQ35173114-E58315A1-E5E5-40A3-9EBF-0D8AC624F210Q35389585-A74305DE-00B3-44ED-AE71-240EBC27274BQ35562391-E1B459AB-952F-4E44-8F49-CB48AD7367F2Q35749173-2F25B117-C1FD-4218-812C-0E731F0DA30FQ35750119-EAE6C0B6-0C46-4C90-824A-F0AEED08CE31Q35816144-E04362C5-ED3F-4ACD-AC90-027E11F6372FQ35939959-529C9BBA-5706-4107-9FDF-692A37F68E0AQ35953736-3EE9D6D7-BAE8-4BBE-8380-BBF3760198BEQ36024000-C2157A15-06B4-4E67-8000-C96EA2203A70Q36106435-2728A0CE-4D6C-418F-B05E-DF0C709E9FEEQ36132572-8AEA5956-A55E-43E6-B24C-4A87A3379DAAQ36268250-BC7CBB0F-108B-41E0-9BB3-605BB7F41CCEQ36269391-2FB7652D-0529-476A-A676-921507194537Q36269406-BFC6D97C-5C4B-4A40-BDBB-33205D8D8268Q36269457-81C0685C-70DC-46BE-B1E5-44C25745E4FAQ36269595-3689FD10-F191-49C2-9ABD-F2269E2B3EECQ36269960-ACA86795-8ADF-4164-B4EA-41DD57A4130BQ36270313-612AB71F-00F8-48E9-A8D2-256757DFDD95Q36270456-D2F82942-5B63-4C25-B263-6F246AE12FA9Q36270492-1A54CBEB-7ECF-4FBE-8AE8-F6CEA33FD955Q36270584-E646A033-1405-4378-8AEB-569C09BCBCA9Q36270954-4B2DBFDE-2DDE-4661-85CA-8A5BD5023D97Q36271323-FAC111EA-A0C5-4FCE-94BF-A11EFF7C51FBQ36271341-0AE7C455-8983-4EEA-B770-C2C2CBAD0C0DQ36271526-5E76C6B5-8CAC-4EB7-AEE9-365D917F2549
P2860
Basal follicle-stimulating hormone level is a better predictor of in vitro fertilization performance than age.
description
1991 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
1991年の論文
@ja
1991年学术文章
@wuu
1991年学术文章
@zh
1991年学术文章
@zh-cn
1991年学术文章
@zh-hans
1991年学术文章
@zh-my
1991年学术文章
@zh-sg
1991年學術文章
@yue
1991年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Basal follicle-stimulating hor ...... lization performance than age.
@en
Basal follicle-stimulating hor ...... lization performance than age.
@nl
type
label
Basal follicle-stimulating hor ...... lization performance than age.
@en
Basal follicle-stimulating hor ...... lization performance than age.
@nl
prefLabel
Basal follicle-stimulating hor ...... lization performance than age.
@en
Basal follicle-stimulating hor ...... lization performance than age.
@nl
P2093
P1476
Basal follicle-stimulating hor ...... lization performance than age.
@en
P2093
C B Philput
S J Muasher
P304
P407
P577
1991-04-01T00:00:00Z