Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences.
about
Comparison of the benefits of cochlear implantation versus contra-lateral routing of signal hearing aids in adult patients with single-sided deafness: study protocol for a prospective within-subject longitudinal trialPilot study on the effectiveness of the conventional CROS, the transcranial CROS and the BAHA transcranial CROS in adults with unilateral inner ear deafness.Audiological evaluation of affected members from a Dutch DFNA8/12 (TECTA) family.Intuitive visualizations of pitch and loudness in speech.The modulation transfer function for speech intelligibilityCombining acoustic and electric stimulation in the service of speech recognition.Development of a novel Italian speech-in-noise test using a roving-level adaptive method: adult population-based normative dataThe Role of Age-Related Declines in Subcortical Auditory Processing in Speech Perception in NoiseSpeech Discrimination Difficulties in High-Functioning Autism Spectrum Disorder Are Likely Independent of Auditory Hypersensitivity.Selecting Appropriate Tests to Assess the Benefits of Bilateral Amplification With Hearing Aids.Age-Related Differences in Lexical Access Relate to Speech Recognition in NoiseWireless and acoustic hearing with bone-anchored hearing devices.Sparse Nonnegative Matrix Factorization Strategy for Cochlear Implants.Psychophysical properties of low-frequency hearing: implications for perceiving speech and music via electric and acoustic stimulationImpact of Background Noise and Sentence Complexity on Processing Demands during Sentence Comprehension.Failing to get the gist of what's being said: background noise impairs higher-order cognitive processing.The cocktail-party problem revisited: early processing and selection of multi-talker speech.Similar phenotypes caused by mutations in OTOG and OTOGL.Native and Non-native Speech Perception by Hearing-Impaired Listeners in Noise- and Speech Maskers.The role of auditory and cognitive factors in understanding speech in noise by normal-hearing older listeners.Audiologist-driven versus patient-driven fine tuning of hearing instrumentsUser evaluation of a communication system that automatically generates captions to improve telephone communicationEffects of noise reduction on speech intelligibility, perceived listening effort, and personal preference in hearing-impaired listeners.Automated screening for high-frequency hearing loss.Speech perception for adult cochlear implant recipients in a realistic background noise: effectiveness of preprocessing strategies and external options for improving speech recognition in noise.The influence of non-native language proficiency on speech perception performance.An eye-tracking paradigm for analyzing the processing time of sentences with different linguistic complexitiesSubthreshold resonance properties contribute to the efficient coding of auditory spatial cues.Cognitive processing load during listening is reduced more by decreasing voice similarity than by increasing spatial separation between target and masker speech.Listening to speech in a background of other talkers: effects of talker number and noise vocoding.THE PSYCHOPHYSICS OF LOW-FREQUENCY ACOUSTIC HEARING IN ELECTRIC AND ACOUSTIC STIMULATION (EAS) AND BIMODAL PATIENTS.Set-size procedures for controlling variations in speech-reception performance with a fluctuating masker.The next generation of Nucleus(®) fitting: a multiplatform approach towards universal cochlear implant management.Spatial release from masking in a free-field source identification task by gray treefrogsMethods of improving speech intelligibility for listeners with hearing resolution deficit.Sound localization in noise by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.Cost-effectiveness of a vocational enablement protocol for employees with hearing impairment; design of a randomized controlled trialBehavioral measures of signal recognition thresholds in frogs in the presence and absence of chorus-shaped noise.Consistency of sentence intelligibility across difficult listening situationsComparison of speech intelligibility in quiet and in noise after hearing aid fitting according to a purely prescriptive and a comparative fitting procedure
P2860
Q21256404-E33F11F5-0425-414C-ACC7-D86A690AAD69Q24633583-6A1F4EA6-2EC3-4A72-9607-C5E5B425050AQ24650370-377EC37B-02BE-401A-AFC6-4EC6E4E3A072Q27302990-D9A75467-0071-465C-B77B-477B9220D30FQ27335999-F363CE5D-2BF3-4A6C-81CB-63C7466789FEQ28744616-1A98FE18-A772-47F0-8790-2A1158EF390AQ30361516-DF599EFD-AE15-44D9-A1D4-471EE614144CQ30373760-268D159E-BE47-432B-B062-096A16AF32C5Q30376012-A45D0AC5-4B18-4726-89AF-A86E06992F12Q30376857-7478B425-6FAC-46B8-A3D8-24A51EA9377FQ30378306-C446B7E1-6D52-48DE-B1C8-36E22C8DA496Q30380712-D381B5DE-86C2-4B03-878D-BCA66963CC97Q30383117-DD44355B-1C2D-49BB-BEE4-9B118EABC90BQ30383121-86F7514D-B3CD-4691-9671-FE26B47E8754Q30387730-C4DF0F74-53E9-4092-99CD-2D41E2FEF2CCQ30388641-CCE2DC73-FB25-49BA-9CAA-3E2197070C0EQ30409082-C5DA40C8-0F27-45D2-8258-4DED11938F86Q30412991-E924E524-C651-4DED-AF0E-706B8E4F5A04Q30413469-3072F994-F1AC-4844-A541-44AEC1688013Q30424558-18A6513A-B3AE-4CE0-81E7-6260C13FD027Q30424814-5F4291A8-B4C1-4C4D-9DCD-FA58A4370AC5Q30424952-A605126E-5142-405D-8C31-1721FF25B2B6Q30425380-7D2C9854-0A18-4CB1-9C69-0D1472719A34Q30427460-61B6652B-12E9-44E6-840F-C1CF665732C5Q30433219-8E4B1146-E0BD-4696-AFF4-F3C36545D47CQ30434190-69131532-DCE6-4146-A6BD-D35A25B23C2BQ30436120-7C592563-851F-44CF-B524-5C818FA2475FQ30436470-78CB0419-1FB6-4B53-BF47-0DA86AEB4AF1Q30438782-61F88939-757F-46CF-B5D5-5CAFBBCCD18CQ30440816-66BA0F90-DAD7-4191-B8AD-B99965927F30Q30447272-922BFE2D-300A-4CF9-9840-21899DF5F64CQ30448659-B884543B-BD17-410E-A786-A253E3B94749Q30452900-921FBE8F-EE18-4876-BF6C-1D27E4C645D2Q30457727-421B7BD8-6C5D-4EAA-97B7-A8D4F76BB3D9Q30459749-4923090F-0B69-4945-8289-3C3550C2A1D5Q30463495-D34DF9D1-8D3E-48F0-B9D1-2ED176F488FAQ30469499-F945E9F3-8CCA-425F-8649-808C08328B91Q30478879-D2F4FB5D-2493-45ED-ACF4-B7F482226294Q30479011-241F4167-AC77-4732-B2F5-5B76A75B3E84Q30493848-86BA105D-60AF-44CA-81CC-5B2E7503B610
P2860
Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences.
description
1979 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
1979年の論文
@ja
1979年学术文章
@wuu
1979年学术文章
@zh
1979年学术文章
@zh-cn
1979年学术文章
@zh-hans
1979年学术文章
@zh-my
1979年学术文章
@zh-sg
1979年學術文章
@yue
1979年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences.
@en
Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences.
@nl
type
label
Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences.
@en
Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences.
@nl
prefLabel
Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences.
@en
Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences.
@nl
P1476
Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences.
@en
P2093
P577
1979-01-01T00:00:00Z