about
Evidence based medicine: a movement in crisis?Patient involvement in clinical research: why, when, and howA European multi-language initiative to make the general population aware of independent clinical research: the European Communication on Research Awareness Need projectLegal and regulatory considerations associated with use of patient-generated health data from social media and mobile health (mHealth) devicesBlood glucose screening rates among Minnesota adults with hypertension, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2011.Patients covertly recording clinical encounters: threat or opportunity? A qualitative analysis of online texts.Is the genomic translational pipeline being disrupted?Use of SMS and tablet computer improves the electronic collection of elective orthopaedic patient reported outcome measures."You can't always get what you want": from doctrine to practicability of study designs for clinical investigation in endometriosis.Providing patient information and education in practice: the role of the health librarian.Feasibility and acceptability of patient partnership to improve access to primary care for the physical health of patients with severe mental illnesses: an interactive guide.Patient-Centered Cancer Care Programs in Italy: Benchmarking Global Patient Education Initiatives.How to Begin a Quality Improvement Project.What it Takes to Successfully Implement Technology for Aging in Place: Focus Groups With Stakeholders.Web Conversations About Complementary and Alternative Medicines and Cancer: Content and Sentiment Analysis.Exploring academics' views on designs, methods, characteristics and outcomes of inclusive health research with people with intellectual disabilities: a modified Delphi study.Patient-controlled hospital admission for patients with severe mental disorders: study protocol for a nationwide prospective multicentre studyBarriers to shared decision making in mental health care: qualitative study of the Joint Crisis Plan for psychosis.Chronic fatigue syndrome: a patient's perspective.Patient-important outcomes in randomized controlled trials in critically ill patients: a systematic review.The 'ouR-HOPE' approach for ethics and communication about neonatal neurological injury.The future of clinical cancer genomics.Improving patient-centredness in partnership with female patients: a cluster RCT in fertility care.Patient partnerships for research.Historic cohort study on mode of delivery of a macrosomic baby: the women's point of view.Decision-Making in Audiology: Balancing Evidence-Based Practice and Patient-Centered Care.Patient Participation at Health Care Conferences: Engaged Patients Increase Information Flow, Expand Propagation, and Deepen Engagement in the Conversation of Tweets Compared to Physicians or Researchers.Patient engagement with research: European population register study.Large variation in measures used to assess outcomes of opioid dependence treatment: A systematic review of longitudinal observational studies.Interpretation of health news items reported with or without spin: protocol for a prospective meta-analysis of 16 randomised controlled trials.Health democracy in Europe: Cancer patient organization participation in health policy.Genuine participation in participant-centred research initiatives: the rhetoric and the potential reality.Development and use of new therapeutics for rare diseases: views from patients, caregivers, and advocates.From subjects to experts--on the current transition of patient participation in research.International core outcome set for clinical trials of medication review in multi-morbid older patients with polypharmacy.Cystic fibrosis: to screen or not to screen? Involving a Citizens' jury in decisions on screening carrier.The Angelina effect revisited: Exploring a media-related impact on public awareness.Patient-important outcomes in systematic reviews: Poor quality of evidence.What is needed in future drug treatment research? A systematic approach to identify gaps on effectiveness of drug treatment from the EMCDDAPerceived Significance of Engagement in Research Prioritization Among Chronic Kidney Disease Patients, Caregivers, and Health Care Professionals: A Qualitative Study
P2860
Q24289042-12570C9A-DFD8-46F4-8E9C-27CD6B1DD166Q26750036-8D976F75-BF97-4238-9E96-17BEE5F2FF05Q28602707-6D3635AC-C630-4DAC-A03F-070191C69381Q30925041-90E1593F-B76B-4E9C-9E81-E2CE88F7AC07Q34584279-708D49B7-FE6A-45A1-BF63-E1F581343AE9Q35561183-68E907BA-52A6-41E3-93C2-02B9CA39917FQ35740694-F4562377-A497-40E7-92F6-3D0B698A728FQ35759601-E6911F93-C40F-4A18-A4FA-2792054C795FQ35816710-5DD62F90-2215-4DB4-9934-977AC6E11D18Q36014676-D099C8EB-E304-41E7-925B-DA1980B93246Q36056527-EB400FCB-7D38-4DA8-B0DC-56CD51F3B7B0Q36798913-55D798EB-CD89-41BE-96E1-DE20906C84C1Q36874578-17B78BF1-F9DC-4416-890D-A04C44C0B622Q36997357-8062DB11-E188-493C-B666-D8A9A60B3D25Q37057065-E2E201F4-13FD-47FF-B770-A50C606547E3Q37236457-6E9F496B-14A5-47A8-A344-C9255FDD6BD3Q37312524-42D32C13-FEB7-4BB4-B1FC-AE36B8A17FC5Q37321339-9C3713AF-9550-4918-973C-7FC39FC37F1CQ37339789-FD1A5155-AE9A-4069-8BB9-9C1A31222A9FQ37685427-E7C71306-6A74-40B4-9247-F57393AF3366Q38787482-77C3922E-D6C7-4F2E-B4D7-EBC31BCBD75FQ38789283-CFE17C40-1B63-4890-B63D-3D7EEFC12369Q39031630-348DA0FD-181D-4ABB-872F-3DB68ABA6C5DQ39204060-9F52833B-E492-4142-926D-AE9EC93E350CQ40653052-647E94C9-0367-4990-8E37-E2D9DBD58515Q41186370-BFF08275-4C16-4258-BE51-01535FCD21E2Q41582054-94AF3A9F-E1D1-4CC1-B01B-793E96FBFE04Q41732233-114A91B4-82AA-48AD-B9F9-F42A62B27445Q43075885-1FCC560B-D2C5-41ED-BC47-6554D83985D7Q47134451-59F4323E-1363-4DF7-B495-5B32D0348A1FQ47583604-F3B26873-9338-4361-93F3-FE6DA6BE7A44Q47642418-41A82DC5-9866-4F25-BD11-971C1566D9D9Q48061020-5A1DA21B-A66E-4606-A1FE-B0D69D94F27CQ48077071-6353604B-412D-4A61-8D43-8956B305EB1DQ50042913-15A0FA2B-12E5-41F9-BE4B-351A74533091Q50326407-2006279F-50F6-4ACB-A83C-34CD1B6D58AEQ50978476-251F8233-0D81-4D8B-A216-A6C6F5C0F301Q52604582-B714927E-E022-47F0-9BBE-D67942ADE959Q57209629-2CEFCE2C-68D6-4A9D-998A-005E6BAB3BEAQ58586658-D7C7B78A-54A3-4C23-B6D8-2324B7ECD557
P2860
description
2013 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2013年の論文
@ja
2013年学术文章
@wuu
2013年学术文章
@zh
2013年学术文章
@zh-cn
2013年学术文章
@zh-hans
2013年学术文章
@zh-my
2013年学术文章
@zh-sg
2013年學術文章
@yue
2013年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Let the patient revolution begin.
@en
Let the patient revolution begin.
@nl
type
label
Let the patient revolution begin.
@en
Let the patient revolution begin.
@nl
prefLabel
Let the patient revolution begin.
@en
Let the patient revolution begin.
@nl
P2093
P356
P1433
P1476
Let the patient revolution begin.
@en
P2093
Peter Lapsley
Tessa Richards
P356
10.1136/BMJ.F2614
P407
P577
2013-05-14T00:00:00Z