Use of 100 kV versus 120 kV in cardiac dual source computed tomography: effect on radiation dose and image quality. - Wikidata - wikimedia - TriplyDB

Use of 100 kV versus 120 kV in cardiac dual source computed tomography: effect on radiation dose and image quality.

Use of 100 kV versus 120 kV in cardiac dual source computed tomography: effect on radiation dose and image quality.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q44888832

about

Feasibility of a radiation dose conserving CT protocol for myocardial function assessment Image quality of ultra-low radiation exposure coronary CT angiography with an effective dose <0.1 mSv using high-pitch spiral acquisition and raw data-based iterative reconstruction.Interobserver agreement for the detection of atherosclerotic plaque in coronary CT angiography: comparison of two low-dose image acquisition protocols with standard retrospectively ECG-gated reconstruction.Combination of a low-tube-voltage technique with hybrid iterative reconstruction (iDose) algorithm at coronary computed tomographic angiography Functional analysis by 64-slice CT scanning: prediction of left ventricular dysfunction together with reduction in radiation exposure?Cardiovascular imaging 2011 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.Prospective ECG-triggered coronary CT angiography: clinical value of noise-based tube current reduction method with iterative reconstruction Use of cardiac CT angiography imaging in an epidemiology study - the Methodology of the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study cardiovascular disease substudy Effect of Tube Voltage (100 vs. 120 kVp) on Radiation Dose and Image Quality using Prospective Gating 320 Row Multi-detector Computed Tomography Angiography.Image quality in coronary CT angiography: challenges and technical solutions.320-row CT scanning: reduction in tube current parallels reduction in radiation exposure?Reduction of radiation dose using 80 kV tube voltage: a feasible strategy?100 kV versus 120 kV: effective reduction in radiation dose?Image quality and required radiation dose for coronary computed tomography angiography using an automatic tube potential selection technique.320-row coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) with automatic exposure control (AEC): effect of 100 kV versus 120 kV on image quality and dose exposure.Establishment of diagnostic reference levels in cardiac CT in France: a need for patient dose optimisation.Influence of image acquisition on radiation dose and image quality: full versus narrow phase window acquisition using 320 MDCT.Radiation dose study of 64-slice spiral CT coronary angiography: a paired design.Evidence for prospective ECG-triggering coronary CT angiography in routine practice.

P2860

Q30405619-885886ED-A99E-4D89-A771-8F9AA82015C3 Q30566073-EEBE893F-6AEB-4056-9755-2F5CCD27AC72 Q34290549-5DBB2997-146C-4B40-9A01-093D487C17F5 Q35150456-16673729-9251-4837-A63B-02D877809E75 Q35238194-29979A04-B0DB-4A48-9021-3B200433A2F3 Q35888981-C88103C0-2C89-474B-A21C-B0A4CEF7ADF1 Q36892491-B422C529-53DD-402B-850F-5532D52D920F Q36903944-DC88C045-639D-44FF-BDE4-C2953F187161 Q37604119-1A054BCA-3A09-4DC6-8D6E-ECE1ACC310D2 Q38774578-C468EC96-C8F8-4B67-AF16-B269FBBBEE1A Q40961242-DCD1C8A9-5D19-463E-8219-AE3653695C90 Q42632543-FA226072-9186-4D57-9B3A-4F628C13B6EE Q42738752-28E9196F-33A9-44F3-A91A-C35B1D87A7C8 Q46703149-74FA3A5E-8DDE-4908-8317-C86FA5406067 Q50853965-61E30D96-3F01-41BC-9495-BE1D1824A8B5 Q53043628-5E9D0C0B-D7B6-411F-AFA9-210E2B7BCABE Q53082350-9CF39059-604E-4318-AB9D-97418B6D9116 Q53133753-42C3427C-3C6B-4A6E-9676-BC7300EC88F7 Q53176008-02CA5437-0F57-4A2A-8CC5-60928478319A

P2860

Use of 100 kV versus 120 kV in cardiac dual source computed tomography: effect on radiation dose and image quality.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q44888832

description

2010 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2010年の論文

@ja

2010年学术文章

@wuu

2010年学术文章

@zh-cn

2010年学术文章

@zh-hans

2010年学术文章

@zh-my

2010年学术文章

@zh-sg

2010年學術文章

@yue

2010年學術文章

@zh

2010年學術文章

@zh-hant

name

Use of 100 kV versus 120 kV in ...... iation dose and image quality.

@en

Use of 100 kV versus 120 kV in ...... iation dose and image quality.

@nl

type

label

Use of 100 kV versus 120 kV in ...... iation dose and image quality.

@en

Use of 100 kV versus 120 kV in ...... iation dose and image quality.

@nl

prefLabel

Use of 100 kV versus 120 kV in ...... iation dose and image quality.

@en

Use of 100 kV versus 120 kV in ...... iation dose and image quality.

@nl

P1433

Q44888832-F999AE13-76C5-4B7E-8004-8F0ADD29E139

P1476

Q44888832-89A417EC-AFD5-4963-8A4B-32C53AB6F818

P2093

Q44888832-00DA7ECB-1EEF-47F4-A8C9-8B96C1D65653

Q44888832-01113D3C-5548-4FC8-BBC2-9DE367A9F269

Q44888832-3F1A8136-AF03-4BB9-9B50-CCF8C6DD0C3E

Q44888832-421399D1-8FBD-4D3C-9053-AF11EA8F1951

Q44888832-4E519114-7C25-476A-B5A4-0EC0743FF9B3

Q44888832-517EAE15-970A-40EA-87D9-3E77E07EF182

Q44888832-82278D8E-3377-4E04-8395-00AB105B7828

Q44888832-87BAF6FB-9843-4F5E-814E-1B879BF8DCE8

Q44888832-D756E45A-55E5-4436-BF2D-A84E36AB12C8

Q44888832-F78C27DD-26A9-44A7-A20A-C31D4D6F363A

P2860

Q44888832-18100B5E-2B69-499E-906A-005D4DC6730F

Q44888832-2ABDD5AD-A07B-4878-AA59-C7DF723C9B54

Q44888832-5860909A-A6A7-4AB2-94C3-865ADC3CE9D6

Q44888832-70061844-38CC-4848-A990-1BA841F7DCAC

Q44888832-93A0E77F-BFBF-447C-82F9-226F438DCB7C

Q44888832-B5ED7903-FF4D-4017-8FF6-3CD8999D386A

P2888

Q44888832-04964FA5-D309-4DE7-A1A7-E79AF480E63D

P304

Q44888832-E0D03666-3522-4764-B5D8-D75170AC38F4

P31

Q44888832-9F817079-02DB-4F12-A53F-990B99268662

P356

Q44888832-5907BDFE-6736-4DA0-8FF3-0BF49ADCDB05

P433

Q44888832-7E666158-FB7A-4680-BA63-994BDCE4D2BC

P478

Q44888832-3BE0C34A-68F3-43A3-931F-040517682F4E

P50

Q44888832-66106A3F-975A-4B89-8E96-6A2CFA680DB8

Q44888832-AC93F23F-68FF-4F05-A97E-C582E81465C7

P577

Q44888832-21E1DA34-3FF5-4DB0-A505-869BEBCD2F43

P698

Q44888832-84041523-98A0-4DBA-B4F4-6C6A9914C500

P356

S10554-010-9683-3

P1433

The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging

P1476

Use of 100 kV versus 120 kV in ...... iation dose and image quality.

@en

P2093

Amar B Shah

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Ammar Sarwar

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Hiram G Bezerra

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Ian S Rogers

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Meagan K Murphy

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Michael A Bolen

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Ricardo C Cury

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Rodrigo Pale

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Ron Blankstein

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Thomas J Brady

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography

Strategies for reduction of radiation dose in cardiac multislice CT.

Image quality and radiation exposure at pulmonary CT angiography with 100- or 120-kVp protocol: prospective randomized study.

Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography.

Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice: impact of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimates.

Radiation dose of cardiac dual-source CT: the effect of tailoring the protocol to patient-specific parameters.

P2888

s10554-010-9683-3

P304

579-586

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1007/S10554-010-9683-3

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

4

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

27

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

P577

2010-08-19T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P698

20721630

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string