Editorial comment: Revisions to the 7th edition of TNM for lung cancer: data are good but prospective data are better!
about
Editorial comment: Revisions to the 7th edition of TNM for lung cancer: data are good but prospective data are better!
description
2012 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2012年の論文
@ja
2012年学术文章
@wuu
2012年学术文章
@zh-cn
2012年学术文章
@zh-hans
2012年学术文章
@zh-my
2012年学术文章
@zh-sg
2012年學術文章
@yue
2012年學術文章
@zh
2012年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Editorial comment: Revisions t ...... t prospective data are better!
@en
Editorial comment: Revisions t ...... t prospective data are better!
@nl
type
label
Editorial comment: Revisions t ...... t prospective data are better!
@en
Editorial comment: Revisions t ...... t prospective data are better!
@nl
prefLabel
Editorial comment: Revisions t ...... t prospective data are better!
@en
Editorial comment: Revisions t ...... t prospective data are better!
@nl
P2860
P356
P1476
Editorial comment: Revisions t ...... t prospective data are better!
@en
P2093
Peter Goldstraw
P2860
P304
P356
10.1093/EJCTS/EZS093
P577
2012-11-01T00:00:00Z