Integrating quality and quantity of mutualistic service to contrast ant species protecting Ferocactus wislizeni.
about
Variation in the outcomes of an ant-plant system: fire and leaf fungus infection reduce benefits to plants with extrafloral nectariesFunctional differences within a guild of tropical mammalian frugivoresThe diversity, ecology and evolution of extrafloral nectaries: current perspectives and future challenges.Trophic ecology of the invasive argentine ant: spatio-temporal variation in resource assimilation and isotopic enrichmentAn ant's-eye view of an ant-plant protection mutualism.Modifying modifiers: what happens when interspecific interactions interact?Thermal tolerance affects mutualist attendance in an ant-plant protection mutualism.Mutualistic ants as an indirect defence against leaf pathogens.Extrafloral nectar fuels ant life in deserts.The effect of disturbance on an ant-plant mutualism.Geographic mosaic of plant evolution: extrafloral nectary variation mediated by ant and herbivore assemblages.Temporal Structure in Cooperative Interactions: What Does the Timing of Exploitation Tell Us about Its Cost?The Influence of Host Plant Extrafloral Nectaries on Multitrophic Interactions: An Experimental InvestigationSeed dispersal effectiveness revisited: a conceptual review.A conceptual framework for studying the strength of plant-animal mutualistic interactions.Reproductive biology of Ferocactus recurvus (Mill.) Borg subsp. recurvus (Cactaceae) in the Tehuacán-Cuicatlán Valley, Mexico.The demographic consequences of mutualism: ants increase host-plant fruit production but not population growth.For ant-protected plants, the best defense is a hungry offense.Plant defense, herbivory, and the growth of Cordia alliodora trees and their symbiotic Azteca ant colonies.Spatial heterogeneity and host repression in fig-fig wasp mutualism.Whole-community mutualism: associated invertebrates facilitate a dominant habitat-forming seaweed.Indirect benefits of symbiotic coccoids for an ant-defended myrmecophytic tree.Interaction frequency and per-interaction effects as predictors of total effects in plant-pollinator mutualisms: a case study with the self-incompatible herb Linaria lilacina.Quantity and quality components of effectiveness in insular pollinator assemblages.Tracking plant preference for higher-quality mycorrhizal symbionts under varying CO2 conditions over multiple generations.Keystone mutualism strengthens top-down effects by recruiting large-bodied ants.Assessing ecological specialization of an ant-seed dispersal mutualism through a wide geographic range.A general framework for effectiveness concepts in mutualisms.Tracing impacts of partner abundance in facultative pollination mutualisms: from individuals to populations.Benefit and cost curves for typical pollination mutualisms.Aggressive bodyguards are not always the best: Preferential interaction with more aggressive ant species reduces reproductive success of plant bearing extrafloral nectaries.Biotic resistance and invasional meltdown: consequences of acquired interspecific interactions for an invasive orchid, Spathoglottis plicata in Puerto RicoLeveraging nature's backup plans to incorporate interspecific interactions and resilience into restorationNo Defensive Role of Ants throughout a Broad Latitudinal and Elevational Range of a CactusGenetic conflict with a parasitic nematode disrupts the legume-rhizobia mutualism
P2860
Q28652835-EA2443FB-1240-4164-930F-1243A0B3A14EQ30054150-02FC634D-8864-4C98-8F11-751EA3417FCAQ33355890-F0E396C5-E9F5-48EA-8238-371B40DF50A4Q33616344-D4C1C62A-0DC0-4C12-A7CD-71FB41F7D386Q33806312-56B6450C-D612-4E5B-ABE5-6B7977077803Q33895743-7C883888-BD22-48BE-9220-AF9C17EEBB37Q34127715-B0EBE5A4-EB10-4398-BE02-BC24B55AEF81Q34395963-0D06A488-4C43-4304-8597-CE581DF40551Q34676173-E292C323-5CA4-472F-A418-60DF9F45A52AQ34981385-A46D853B-6E00-4A1F-9DA2-CEE823019EF8Q35465031-2B569DBF-62C7-4060-9CA5-88F02464080CQ35913590-4DA258A9-3C78-4675-8479-1216B759C8E5Q36083023-989E77CD-B766-43CA-83CA-3D1E9C2221CAQ37776754-15744F0A-98E3-4130-AF52-D52E3FD32AE5Q38367276-D4CA8DB7-0DE7-4647-AD18-1B1A7387F858Q38754377-AB57394A-8E99-4E45-8CBE-EFAD28A11D36Q39008186-C6E9DB59-FEA7-445A-8744-9CA2AAB26A3EQ39299668-D4A75EC0-B921-4212-88F9-55DD867E95FCQ39369292-01158932-AF42-4017-89CD-3585E725F5DFQ41088498-B1177722-8DE3-4EB0-97BB-0931678FFE4DQ43783040-D99C6FEF-7FAA-4D75-A527-25EC206B1644Q45932280-DE91832A-5788-48CB-89C8-CD540C7D16C6Q46343770-1F07F67B-0F96-4BAB-A557-03720C28533BQ46890164-1252F1B5-AEA6-4412-B049-828BD9C0E5FAQ48266564-B256AC96-B35D-4DC5-B49E-B33B04E8DEDCQ50156348-BF5AAD64-726D-4D55-AA8D-3BB738C0FBB9Q51177480-C17EBF3B-374B-4F79-9AA1-D52FC6332364Q51219991-B34C88A6-8D4A-4491-AC87-AFA22BA672A1Q51552654-26FD3A31-4B7A-47A3-A0DA-34733AC86B4DQ51563444-65624C2F-BA5C-482F-BC87-AD85A1B25A2DQ55447744-FC30F3DF-8149-4755-AFF2-B7C0420DCA32Q56447045-2444E147-FF58-4C63-B52E-A472E08208BEQ57044285-EB862A13-44C2-4841-A2A6-E48431C3C6C0Q57068099-C6C7E1D0-37A7-46C1-BF0C-334F389A6497Q57103924-D915EDBE-62C6-4F36-B8F7-5618CB781E90
P2860
Integrating quality and quantity of mutualistic service to contrast ant species protecting Ferocactus wislizeni.
description
2006 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2006年の論文
@ja
2006年学术文章
@wuu
2006年学术文章
@zh-cn
2006年学术文章
@zh-hans
2006年学术文章
@zh-my
2006年学术文章
@zh-sg
2006年學術文章
@yue
2006年學術文章
@zh
2006年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Integrating quality and quanti ...... otecting Ferocactus wislizeni.
@en
Integrating quality and quanti ...... otecting Ferocactus wislizeni.
@nl
type
label
Integrating quality and quanti ...... otecting Ferocactus wislizeni.
@en
Integrating quality and quanti ...... otecting Ferocactus wislizeni.
@nl
prefLabel
Integrating quality and quanti ...... otecting Ferocactus wislizeni.
@en
Integrating quality and quanti ...... otecting Ferocactus wislizeni.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P1433
P1476
Integrating quality and quanti ...... otecting Ferocactus wislizeni.
@en
P2093
P2860
P304
P356
10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[912:IQAQOM]2.0.CO;2
P407
P577
2006-04-01T00:00:00Z