A comparison of Likert and visual analogue scales for measuring change in function.
about
The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigationQuality of life effects of antithrombin III in sepsis survivors: results from the KyberSept trial [ISRCTN22931023]The importance of patient-reported outcomes: a call for their comprehensive integration in cardiovascular clinical trialsTinnitus outcomes assessment.The ChQoL questionnaire: an Italian translation with preliminary psychometric results for female oncological patients.Efficiency of immediate postoperative inpatient physical therapy following total knee arthroplasty: an RCTDevelopment and psychometric testing of the Visual Analogue Scale for Irritable Bowel Syndrome (VAS-IBS).How should the impact of different presentations of treatment effects on patient choice be evaluated? A pilot randomized trial.The Functional Arm Scale for Throwers (FAST)-Part I: The Design and Development of an Upper Extremity Region-Specific and Population-Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Scale for Throwing Athletes.The minimally important difference and patient acceptable symptom state for the Raynaud's condition score in patients with Raynaud's phenomenon in a large randomised controlled clinical trialAn official American Thoracic Society statement: update on the mechanisms, assessment, and management of dyspnea.Psychometric evaluation of a visual analog scale for the assessment of anxiety.What clinical instructors want: perspectives on a new assessment tool for students in the clinical environmentDoes a torsion adapter improve functional mobility, pain, and fatigue in patients with transtibial amputation?Comparing health status in Belarus between 2001-10: a novel method using surveys with different response categories.Clinical outcomes of patients with lumbar disc herniation, selected for one-level open-discectomy and microdiscectomyRandomized, double-blind, comparative study of dexrabeprazole 10 mg versus rabeprazole 20 mg in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.Quantifying social consequences of occupational injuries and illnesses: state of the art and research agenda.Review of dyspnoea quantification in the emergency department: is a rating scale for breathlessness suitable for use as an admission prediction tool?Challenging script concordance test reference standard by evidence: do judgments by emergency medicine consultants agree with likelihood ratios?A rapid screening tool for fatigue impact in multiple sclerosis.Inspiratory high frequency airway oscillation attenuates resistive loaded dyspnea and modulates respiratory function in young healthy individuals.Preliminary development and validation of a new end-of-life patient-reported outcome measure assessing the ability of patients to finalise their affairs at the end of life.Comparison of visual and objective quantification of elbow and shoulder movement in children with obstetric brachial plexus palsy.Development of a disease specific questionnaire to measure health related quality of life in patients with chronic liver diseaseSymptom evaluation in reflux disease: workshop background, processes, terminology, recommendations, and discussion outputsA blueprint for symptom scales and responses: measurement and reporting.How Do Perceptions of Asthma Control and Severity Relate to Indicators of Asthma Status and Treatment Recommendations by Pediatricians?Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty using mini midvastus or medial parapatellar approach technique: A prospective, randomized, international multicentre trialA placebo-controlled trial of acotiamide for meal-related symptoms of functional dyspepsia.The validation of the visual analogue scale for patient satisfaction after total hip arthroplastyNipple Reconstruction After Autologous or Expander Breast Reconstruction: A Multimodal and 3-Dimensional Analysis.A randomised comparison of a four- and a five-point scale version of the Norwegian Function Assessment Scale.Effectiveness of prolonged use of continuous passive motion (CPM), as an adjunct to physiotherapy, after total knee arthroplastyInterrater Reliability of Four Sensory Measures in People with Multiple SclerosisPredictors of loss of asthma control induced by corticosteroid withdrawalDevelopment and validation of quality of life scale of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: the QOL-NPC (version 2).Comparison of the early results of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and posterior lumbar interbody fusion in symptomatic lumbar instability.Adaptive Visual Analog Scales (AVAS): a modifiable software program for the creation, administration, and scoring of visual analog scales.Canadian Physiotherapy Assessment of Clinical Performance: Face and Content Validity.
P2860
Q21606688-433F1A28-2510-4863-8F49-77604B49C9EAQ24801537-0E8D8A06-E79A-4C30-93E3-7C94B81C51EAQ27009483-FB7466E6-32FF-4E0D-9A28-BC9B7BF2BFC3Q30424978-FB0CFE9C-6637-4EBE-9D47-E3C3CCA0879BQ30497067-2C3B78BF-1241-4C46-A15A-D15F8241FDC4Q33255897-B470FED0-7390-4BA5-A855-13FF20F287B0Q33283471-AFDB5A4C-2A0C-4ADC-8CCB-467242356561Q33386824-AAE3675B-97F2-47AC-80A1-A9EA1A5D2397Q33590042-82481B79-AD1C-442A-A2B8-142FECF0BA6FQ33724464-3E72334A-CDB9-4B27-913E-D3B6B19958DDQ33738878-EC07E07A-49D0-408F-94D9-36CDFBF8DB5EQ33997934-AA988861-BBFE-4968-BDA9-F324BE7D7813Q34034548-0EDC6B12-8FBC-4F92-98D5-CB3928152E39Q34161531-28F5D557-24EE-4213-9C31-DD0ED44A9A71Q34302851-C5D6230F-78D2-4E84-9719-71AC65724AE6Q34338245-FE8675BB-D027-469D-856F-C09163EAAEB3Q34382107-41BD357D-D7E4-41E0-BE65-D64F1B451E1AQ34400293-B60E73A0-E4FA-441F-AAFB-3E28B1C0B28EQ34699057-5CDFA150-EF8E-45E4-A66A-92DFD78343B8Q35011725-CAAEFB1F-B26F-47C5-9E4B-9B6662785329Q35053381-963B1C64-2428-45C8-8699-4E329D735D5BQ35126299-74D141B2-2483-4C17-AF70-F1CA574CA2BCQ35148891-57B90CA2-F6E7-423E-84C9-0A9FD38B173AQ35241321-58E74D25-F151-4654-9D8A-CAE526B69BCDQ35356375-D009BABB-5095-4AEB-8CB6-0A2B40840ED5Q35745029-AC6E5264-3503-4736-BFC3-7FE0679FE1FEQ35745050-83D567B9-997F-40FE-BCD5-4896C38C63A9Q35836807-642CC1F0-FFCA-4EBE-B6BC-328A306D59ACQ35892976-14D4644A-1270-4632-9CB5-A197AD53C6D1Q35939253-DE3BC24B-4A8D-4846-9050-9C21D2746F79Q36075838-DBA6CA3B-2FD9-4C2A-8B96-211254E5C106Q36227041-BE1B36BE-DA7D-455B-A6BD-9AF5F3F7CC20Q36511754-73DEDED8-4C08-4809-86F5-874DA158D885Q36662314-6B5BCF65-4080-40FD-90BD-56FC1E8EB14FQ36848179-8055C2AB-DE46-4937-890A-6C7300012D92Q36883469-A80D53AC-E4F3-4C05-9851-42760CEA6311Q36886955-ADBF194E-6891-41B0-8E9C-A089BFCF2F9FQ36943739-73ED4B96-ED48-4F4C-9E0C-45DDA26532E4Q37082947-B4D61862-3CE8-4E3B-AF5C-135A70BF096CQ37127174-16B6C7D1-437D-4834-A507-ECF7B9BC6A6B
P2860
A comparison of Likert and visual analogue scales for measuring change in function.
description
1987 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
1987年の論文
@ja
1987年学术文章
@wuu
1987年学术文章
@zh-cn
1987年学术文章
@zh-hans
1987年学术文章
@zh-my
1987年学术文章
@zh-sg
1987年學術文章
@yue
1987年學術文章
@zh
1987年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
A comparison of Likert and visual analogue scales for measuring change in function.
@en
A comparison of Likert and visual analogue scales for measuring change in function.
@nl
type
label
A comparison of Likert and visual analogue scales for measuring change in function.
@en
A comparison of Likert and visual analogue scales for measuring change in function.
@nl
prefLabel
A comparison of Likert and visual analogue scales for measuring change in function.
@en
A comparison of Likert and visual analogue scales for measuring change in function.
@nl
P2093
P1476
A comparison of Likert and visual analogue scales for measuring change in function.
@en
P2093
P304
P356
10.1016/0021-9681(87)90080-4
P577
1987-01-01T00:00:00Z