Cost-effectiveness of two endovascular treatment strategies vs intravenous thrombolysis.
about
Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Health Technology AssessmentLogistical and financial obstacles for endovascular therapy of acute stroke implementation.Observed Cost and Variations in Short Term Cost-Effectiveness of Therapy for Ischemic Stroke in Interventional Management of Stroke (IMS) IIIStrokes in the anterior circulation: comparison between bridging and intravenous thrombolysis.Health Technology Optimization Analysis: Conceptual Approach and Illustrative Application
P2860
Cost-effectiveness of two endovascular treatment strategies vs intravenous thrombolysis.
description
2012 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2012年の論文
@ja
2012年学术文章
@wuu
2012年学术文章
@zh
2012年学术文章
@zh-cn
2012年学术文章
@zh-hans
2012年学术文章
@zh-my
2012年学术文章
@zh-sg
2012年學術文章
@yue
2012年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Cost-effectiveness of two endovascular treatment strategies vs intravenous thrombolysis.
@en
Cost-effectiveness of two endovascular treatment strategies vs intravenous thrombolysis.
@nl
type
label
Cost-effectiveness of two endovascular treatment strategies vs intravenous thrombolysis.
@en
Cost-effectiveness of two endovascular treatment strategies vs intravenous thrombolysis.
@nl
prefLabel
Cost-effectiveness of two endovascular treatment strategies vs intravenous thrombolysis.
@en
Cost-effectiveness of two endovascular treatment strategies vs intravenous thrombolysis.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P356
P1476
Cost-effectiveness of two endovascular treatment strategies vs intravenous thrombolysis
@en
P2093
D W J Dippel
M A Koopmanschap
P S S Fransen
S A Baeten
P2860
P304
P356
10.1111/ANE.12065
P407
P577
2012-12-31T00:00:00Z