Nonpalpable, circumscribed, noncalcified solid breast masses: likelihood of malignancy based on lesion size and age of patient.
about
Quantitative ultrasound analysis for classification of BI-RADS category 3 breast masses.Probably benign lesions at screening breast US in a population with elevated risk: prevalence and rate of malignancy in the ACRIN 6666 trial.Usefulness of ultrasound elastography in reducing the number of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 3 lesions on ultrasonography.Assessment of 1183 screen-detected, category 3B, circumscribed masses by cytology and core biopsy with long-term follow up data.Malignant and benign breast masses on 3D US volumetric images: effect of computer-aided diagnosis on radiologist accuracyBenign core biopsy of probably benign breast lesions 2 cm or larger: correlation with excisional biopsy and long-term follow-up.Validation of results from knowledge discovery: mass density as a predictor of breast cancer.The mammographic density of a mass is a significant predictor of breast cancer.Benign-appearing mammographic abnormalities in women aged 40-49.Synchronous BI-RADS Category 3 Lesions on Preoperative Ultrasonography in Patients with Breast Cancer: Is Short-Term Follow-Up Appropriate?Issues in breast cancer screening.Breast tumor characteristics of BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers on MRI.Identification of women with early breast cancer by analysis of p43-positive lymphocytes.Diagnostic Value of Hook Wire Localization Technique for Non-Palpable Breast Lesions.Multiple bilateral circumscribed masses at screening breast US: consider annual follow-upAssociation between BRCA Mutation Status, Pathological Findings, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features in Patients with Breast Cancer at Risk for the MutationMulti-modality CADx: ROC study of the effect on radiologists' accuracy in characterizing breast masses on mammograms and 3D ultrasound imagesRisk of malignancy in palpable solid breast masses considered probably benign or low suspicion: implications for management.Outcomes of solid palpable masses assessed as BI-RADS 3 or 4A: a retrospective review.Comparison of visibility of circumscribed masses on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) and 2D mammography: are circumscribed masses better visualized and assured of being benign on DBT?Role of stereotactic breast biopsy.Clinical and diagnostic value of preoperative MR mammography and FDG-PET in suspicious breast lesions.Timeliness of follow-up after abnormal screening mammography.Biopsy versus conservative management of sonographically benign-appearing solid breast masses in adolescents.Neues zum Hochrisikomammascreening
P2860
Q30424166-AC8102BD-C360-47A1-8E00-4787E4DCDB1FQ30424727-C5AADD75-1483-47A4-8CA9-F336A5E37A74Q30831653-A03E598E-8B71-47F7-A3B3-D5B4FD812E89Q31151261-30562443-1E9A-4042-A497-4D9564850BF1Q33568413-7F7281E0-73AC-41B0-869B-8B1A49DD4A15Q33926086-C1BDF5E4-4D36-4C24-8A00-70118261B222Q34176979-FE8E8749-790C-4A5D-97BF-01233BEEBB39Q34534802-AF64701A-4F3A-4131-A990-4FA660EB0CC4Q34669409-FCD0E34B-7A81-4B69-BF20-32444A6025FDQ35813056-8D1C5E07-9DD9-421D-8DA5-94AA38C5A1CBQ36008484-A757946C-EE04-4ED7-A535-744AA4C55D1DQ36538605-3F335DBC-1855-449C-8EFF-9F34B976BC8BQ36617734-C9A4C5D2-EECD-41B7-906D-95FEEFEE41DAQ36756200-977CBCE0-CBEE-49D5-BE5A-E0D2F09EE060Q37113274-97D6767D-F673-4B90-BDB3-BE8C816C5A78Q37240051-EC1E86A1-D298-4BF9-9E0D-31B384DDE9D1Q37292379-DDF2E7FB-0982-432C-916B-5AA44517C9F0Q38063836-F9AF59FB-3463-4061-91FB-B3102ED6689AQ38242656-D38D04E4-A07E-4192-BA34-BCC41AD52A7FQ40378013-81D8B0A5-3792-43A0-AF2C-E96468D728ACQ41169005-7B26C57D-A9DB-4991-938E-7C7688075F2FQ44498032-2B0A6357-DC0E-4A27-91BD-43C9BB2E1E71Q49128623-C9ABA286-F648-4A27-B37F-4E2DAFDA0724Q50945458-6E566635-30B3-4D48-8170-97A90689F1F6Q57712658-7F862282-A2B5-4959-B9FC-04999C5E18B9
P2860
Nonpalpable, circumscribed, noncalcified solid breast masses: likelihood of malignancy based on lesion size and age of patient.
description
1994 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
1994年の論文
@ja
1994年学术文章
@wuu
1994年学术文章
@zh
1994年学术文章
@zh-cn
1994年学术文章
@zh-hans
1994年学术文章
@zh-my
1994年学术文章
@zh-sg
1994年學術文章
@yue
1994年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Nonpalpable, circumscribed, no ...... esion size and age of patient.
@en
Nonpalpable, circumscribed, no ...... esion size and age of patient.
@nl
type
label
Nonpalpable, circumscribed, no ...... esion size and age of patient.
@en
Nonpalpable, circumscribed, no ...... esion size and age of patient.
@nl
prefLabel
Nonpalpable, circumscribed, no ...... esion size and age of patient.
@en
Nonpalpable, circumscribed, no ...... esion size and age of patient.
@nl
P1433
P1476
Nonpalpable, circumscribed, no ...... esion size and age of patient.
@en
P2093
Sickles EA
P304
P356
10.1148/RADIOLOGY.192.2.8029411
P407
P577
1994-08-01T00:00:00Z