Burch colposuspension versus fascial sling to reduce urinary stress incontinence.
about
Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in womenOpen retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in womenTraditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in womenSingle-incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in womenOpen retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in womenAutologous pubovaginal slings: back to the future or a lost art?Pubovaginal sling materials and their outcomesStem cell therapy for incontinence: where are we now? What is the realistic potential?To mesh or not to mesh: a review of pelvic organ reconstructive surgeryPost-Sling Urinary Retention in Women.Findings of universal cystoscopy at incontinence surgery and their sequelaeUrinary incontinence management costs are reduced following Burch or sling surgery for stress incontinenceRisk factors for urinary tract infection following incontinence surgery.Risk factors associated with urge incontinence after continence surgeryPatient satisfaction with stress incontinence surgeryComplications in women undergoing Burch colposuspension versus autologous rectus fascial sling for stress urinary incontinence.Predictors of treatment failure 24 months after surgery for stress urinary incontinence.Mixed incontinence: comparing definitions in women having stress incontinence surgery.Challenges of conducting multi-center, multi-disciplinary urinary incontinence clinical trials: experience of the urinary incontinence treatment network.Canadian Urological Association position statement on the use of transvaginal mesh.Randomized Comparative Study of the U- and H-Type Approaches of the TVT-Secur Procedure for the Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence: One-Year Follow-Up.Comparison of 2 transvaginal surgical approaches and perioperative behavioral therapy for apical vaginal prolapse: the OPTIMAL randomized trial.Treatment of stress urinary incontinence with adipose tissue-derived stem cells.Challenges in designing a pragmatic clinical trial: the mixed incontinence -- medical or surgical approach (MIMOSA) trial experienceOutcomes following vaginal prolapse repair and mid urethral sling (OPUS) trial--design and methods.Effect of aging on storage and voiding function in women with stress predominant urinary incontinenceStress incontinence.Urinary bacteria in adult women with urgency urinary incontinenceEvaluation of transvaginal slings using different materials in the management of female stress urinary incontinenceThe role of synthetic slings in male stress incontinenceBiomaterials in urinary incontinence and treatment of their complications.Preoperative clinical, demographic, and urodynamic measures associated with failure to demonstrate urodynamic stress incontinence in women enrolled in two randomized clinical trials of surgery for stress urinary incontinence.Retropubic versus transobturator midurethral slings for stress incontinence.Improving urinary incontinence in overweight and obese women through modest weight loss.Quantification of neurological and other contributors to continence in female rats.Normal preoperative urodynamic testing does not predict voiding dysfunction after Burch colposuspension versus pubovaginal sling.Symptoms of combined prolapse and urinary incontinence in large surgical cohorts.Preoperative voiding detrusor pressures do not predict stress incontinence surgery outcomesPreoperative hesitating urinary stream is associated with postoperative voiding dysfunction and surgical failure following Burch colposuspension or pubovaginal rectus fascial sling surgery.Short-term outcomes of vaginal mesh placement among female Medicare beneficiaries.
P2860
Q24186136-FEA9F502-D755-448F-A8BD-65AEC81DB693Q24202809-1721A6B0-0E28-4F58-A335-802AF9D250E3Q24235009-B42ABF64-7985-4B63-9D44-1C57AE2809F1Q24235694-4B6A423B-4A5C-4834-9E18-B8B390D81F6FQ24240012-D9F1D4EB-3999-4A89-A0E9-B1B44FAAC69EQ26768669-3B9A05CC-82E2-41FD-9A98-A907F73F8FB9Q26795517-4F9380FB-5754-4F50-B66D-A4D69DC7F91FQ26827498-801F4FEC-ECE1-49A7-83F5-33C7E1140E28Q26866917-E11B5AAD-00F9-426D-98D0-7970F76985B3Q30245057-E1D92CD5-3ECC-41BC-9452-00B77BADA84FQ30405390-C8EFF6AE-594D-4540-8A94-8287E3D5289FQ30407573-F9758443-E5EC-4B29-889D-BFA6B327BCB4Q30410313-E8E6319A-95CD-434B-8D1D-97A6FA88A063Q30414841-5DC7C2B5-3C6D-4331-812F-1A5F0331C977Q30417793-55EC9407-8912-4768-92BC-8C22934AF6C8Q30438429-76B8A635-8C95-460B-AF65-43BC53E3F5D5Q30439250-EDC15D84-0A1F-4BF5-85B1-54446FA356EFQ30439370-A91F37F7-8447-466A-88C1-DB52E3B9FB11Q30447396-E6FB97C9-1C94-4192-A476-2E774AA04E26Q33769837-63154CB6-F08B-477D-98D4-C2C4F266FC22Q33807339-E333693C-632A-4477-A0FE-1B95E235CA48Q33851692-E907945D-B92D-48EE-B29F-24098DA2EAA9Q33856455-0C072886-B0F2-4E6D-9A66-2639D958DA35Q33875100-5D091666-50C4-43A5-9C06-779BE73F3D50Q33884995-CB041BF0-AE2F-4878-A1B7-2428A22D9171Q33922584-815B05EB-5669-4B12-8659-3CF04B1C50F5Q34010677-EBB84FD0-B787-46F0-8EE1-5484DC9B0E15Q34028648-1F94A6BE-4D62-4E16-B8EA-4AE17783846DQ34114701-F8B918EB-01A6-4A9A-B394-175938714189Q34114774-91A33060-750A-455D-9080-9EEF80FD3AFEQ34124012-9CD4C97E-E03B-47EB-A8C4-FA2B4790D5ADQ34215043-874737D5-7B2D-4D5F-808F-89A473A4D45AQ34232525-6CD023EA-50EE-470A-80CC-96AA99F42812Q34571581-78140096-CD69-4028-B647-F4F5097F5276Q34855653-689BFEB0-F7BB-436A-9058-779BCA6D503CQ34977629-4B0A0E30-F335-4508-BE3D-0E748B2A45D7Q34982009-1E4A99F4-E467-46B1-82C0-B015CDE1044FQ34990516-6A849B5E-653B-4C02-B0C2-9D91F5BCB67BQ34993409-E6837396-97D2-4D99-BA83-3A1A6F7A70D6Q35022514-4E7D8589-B34B-4F82-9F6E-DB1738062F13
P2860
Burch colposuspension versus fascial sling to reduce urinary stress incontinence.
description
2007 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2007年の論文
@ja
2007年学术文章
@wuu
2007年学术文章
@zh
2007年学术文章
@zh-cn
2007年学术文章
@zh-hans
2007年学术文章
@zh-my
2007年学术文章
@zh-sg
2007年學術文章
@yue
2007年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Burch colposuspension versus fascial sling to reduce urinary stress incontinence.
@en
Burch colposuspension versus fascial sling to reduce urinary stress incontinence.
@nl
type
label
Burch colposuspension versus fascial sling to reduce urinary stress incontinence.
@en
Burch colposuspension versus fascial sling to reduce urinary stress incontinence.
@nl
prefLabel
Burch colposuspension versus fascial sling to reduce urinary stress incontinence.
@en
Burch colposuspension versus fascial sling to reduce urinary stress incontinence.
@nl
P2093
P356
P1476
Burch colposuspension versus fascial sling to reduce urinary stress incontinence.
@en
P2093
Ananias C Diokno
Anne M Stoddard
Charles Nager
Gary E Lemack
Halina Zyczynski
Harry W Johnson
Holly E Richter
John W Kusek
Kimberly J Dandreo
Kimberly Kenton
P304
P356
10.1056/NEJMOA070416
P407
P577
2007-05-21T00:00:00Z