Us versus them: Political attitudes and party affiliation influence neural response to faces of presidential candidates.
about
Do Political and Economic Choices Rely on Common Neural Substrates? A Systematic Review of the Emerging Neuropolitics LiteratureAlteration of Political Belief by Non-invasive Brain Stimulation.Defining Neuromarketing: Practices and Professional ChallengesMotivated independence? Implicit party identity predicts political judgments among self-proclaimed Independents.Neuromarketing: the hope and hype of neuroimaging in businessThe functional architecture for face-processing expertise: FMRI evidence of the developmental trajectory of the core and the extended face systemsNeurophysiology of functional imaging.Voting behavior is reflected in amygdala response across cultures.Functional neuroanatomy associated with natural and urban scenic views in the human brain: 3.0T functional MR imaging.Neuroelectrical correlates of trustworthiness and dominance judgments related to the observation of political candidates.Nonpolitical images evoke neural predictors of political ideology.Individualism, conservatism, and radicalism as criteria for processing political beliefs: a parametric fMRI study.The political left rolls with the good and the political right confronts the bad: connecting physiology and cognition to preferencesA step into the anarchist's mind: examining political attitudes and ideology through event-related brain potentials.Auditory Contagious Yawning in Humans: An Investigation into Affiliation and Status EffectsSingle-case cognitive neuropsychology in the age of big data.Neural correlates of attitude change following positive and negative advertisements.Is social categorization based on relational ingroup/outgroup opposition? A meta-analysis.Neural correlates of maintaining one's political beliefs in the face of counterevidenceFrom the Brain to the Field: The Applications of Social Neuroscience to Economics, Health and Law.The implications of the new brain sciences. The 'Decade of the Brain' is over but its effects are now becoming visible as neuropolitics and neuroethics, and in the emergence of neuroeconomiesNeuropolitics: Twenty years later.Neurolaw: Differential brain activity for black and white faces predicts damage awards in hypothetical employment discrimination cases.Neural mechanisms underlying subsequent memory for personal beliefs:An fMRI study.Political ideology as motivated social cognition: Behavioral and neuroscientific evidenceThe Salmon of DoubtInsights From fMRI Studies Into Ingroup BiasOn Epistemological Shifts and Good Old French Wine (in New Bottles): Commentary on Elcheroth, Doise, and Reicher
P2860
Q26768565-F8B5C6D5-898A-40C5-B08D-E92C0932BB37Q27317230-9A89655D-6984-4E42-B952-F5DD119CE862Q29013532-91D9ABED-8440-469B-A646-0189602E67DEQ30455936-200C6FBF-B7B3-4883-A15A-3EC934C7D573Q30494670-D7BDC28F-A74B-4FA0-84DF-C154004DD9FDQ30557212-DF236B58-B883-4184-8EA4-021D16DB8D60Q33370477-FFB12E86-999E-419D-9FF6-9B11081DDE99Q33951346-C909D203-6F5D-40E6-985E-A3A442F366E5Q34091995-A2EA04A1-A2D4-4A37-B57F-29BE3B935D7DQ34152013-58BED191-A1C0-4337-B08B-9CC866059231Q34578740-1458F4EB-645B-4907-8BCC-1FBB880967D0Q34989607-7565D932-7953-40A2-9E26-D4AFF0C874DEQ35679475-900CCD4C-77E6-4A10-8FD2-65951A979C26Q35832584-7E5CA856-6DD8-4F40-8FB2-331D9C83BA71Q36258346-42594A88-A951-4E7B-B0DC-E3BA3464ADF4Q36374162-3E32540C-9803-4B70-B43C-2CBCC2CB4F55Q37214210-6BE2F47F-ACA7-4F94-92C1-BD7054FB8A36Q37318444-F4A61E37-D423-4A60-9124-6F11943424F8Q39739697-7003FA13-E66B-4CAE-B870-F00D7052D8F8Q41552692-11A7C1C9-E0C6-447B-A1CD-F385D012CD9EQ41850455-D3000CCC-9BD0-4968-A531-9B91C888CC3AQ47556489-1256DFB3-2A7E-40A3-B489-E3ACA1255E28Q48296320-55DA9B47-C874-4CE7-86EF-6CF239F70DFBQ50089555-C3D4853D-480F-437D-A232-F9C8E2D2373CQ56532290-4B99DAAF-E4C0-4DAE-9834-C9DAEE0B17D3Q57277974-9150D19C-38EE-49BC-A5B8-D1F67C5D570CQ57486716-299A177E-3F3C-4E7E-997D-6BC4EAFEB63CQ58194831-FE491547-CA94-44E9-A574-6AE4C812E670
P2860
Us versus them: Political attitudes and party affiliation influence neural response to faces of presidential candidates.
description
2006 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2006年の論文
@ja
2006年学术文章
@wuu
2006年学术文章
@zh-cn
2006年学术文章
@zh-hans
2006年学术文章
@zh-my
2006年学术文章
@zh-sg
2006年學術文章
@yue
2006年學術文章
@zh
2006年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Us versus them: Political atti ...... es of presidential candidates.
@en
Us versus them: Political atti ...... es of presidential candidates.
@nl
type
label
Us versus them: Political atti ...... es of presidential candidates.
@en
Us versus them: Political atti ...... es of presidential candidates.
@nl
prefLabel
Us versus them: Political atti ...... es of presidential candidates.
@en
Us versus them: Political atti ...... es of presidential candidates.
@nl
P2093
P1433
P1476
Us versus them: Political atti ...... es of presidential candidates.
@en
P2093
Jonas T Kaplan
Joshua Freedman
Marco Iacoboni
P356
10.1016/J.NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA.2006.04.024
P577
2006-06-09T00:00:00Z