Anger and guilt about ingroup advantage explain the willingness for political action.
about
The Role of Perceived In-group Moral Superiority in Reparative Intentions and Approach MotivationAffective Balance, Team Prosocial Efficacy and Team Trust: A Multilevel Analysis of Prosocial Behavior in Small GroupsDeterminants of Prosocial Behavior in Included Versus Excluded Contexts.Fear and Anger in Great Britain: Blame Assignment and Emotional Reactions to the Financial Crisis'This will bring shame on our nation': The role of anticipated group-based emotions on collective action.The political solidarity model of social change: dynamics of self-categorization in intergroup power relations.Relative deprivation: a theoretical and meta-analytic review.Protesters as "passionate economists": a dynamic dual pathway model of approach coping with collective disadvantage.Intrapsychic and interpersonal guilt: a critical review of the recent literature.Emotional collectives: How groups shape emotions and emotions shape groups.Choosing the right level of analysis: Stereotypes shape social reality via collective action.Emotional reactions to success and failure of collective action as predictors of future action intentions: a longitudinal investigation in the context of student protests in Germany.Me against we: in-group transgression, collective shame, and in-group-directed hostility.Angry opposition to government redress: when the structurally advantaged perceive themselves as relatively deprived.Feeling both victim and perpetrator: investigating duality within the needs-based model.Disappointment expression evokes collective guilt and collective action in intergroup conflict: the moderating role of legitimacy perceptions.Two faces of group-based shame: moral shame and image shame differentially predict positive and negative orientations to ingroup wrongdoing.Shame and guilt--do they really differ in their focus of evaluation? Wanting to change the self and behavior in response to ingroup immorality.Why individuals protest the perceived transgressions of their country: the role of anger, shame, and guilt.Perspective taking and opinions about forms of reparation for victims of historical harm.The influence of norms and social identities on children's responses to bullying.Emotional responses to rejection of gestures of intergroup reconciliation.Advantaged group's emotional reactions to intergroup inequality: the dynamics of pride, guilt, and sympathy.Online Discussion and the Moral Pathway to Identity Politicization and Collective Action.Concern for self-image and social image in the management of moral failure: Rethinking shameSocial identities facilitate and encapsulate action-relevant constructsWhites for racial justice: How contact with Black Americans predicts support for collective action among White AmericansMoral duty or moral defence? The effects of perceiving shared humanity with the victims of ingroup perpetrated harmEmbarrassment: The ingroup-outgroup audience effect in faux pas situationsGroup-based guilt and reparation in the context of social changeMotivational determinants of prosocial behavior: What do included, hopeful excluded, and hopeless excluded individuals need to behave prosocially?Exploring the self-directed anger of the stigmatized
P2860
Q33744220-B1C6B4E2-BBAB-42A2-81DF-8DB2E2E15D3FQ35758852-1171D707-0B63-4B2B-8118-6A29AC567611Q36439319-4EFEC790-6E94-4DF7-824C-6BFFC7A5FF83Q36525177-78CB37AE-B802-48F6-8FE0-0777AF7C84FCQ36852864-78A78E2B-62B4-45C2-9878-FCDF21574D77Q37300938-7395E219-E7D1-44A4-9812-749BB4DC476CQ37970982-05846D2D-1EA1-4B23-9570-0D3C153BC9FFQ37975479-BE3B9E93-AEC8-44B1-8347-D84AB042E5B4Q38111640-7B58E87E-484B-4EA0-853A-61AD02AD91DAQ38590681-2B596058-299C-4B71-9C5F-80FC18F8029AQ39192501-A37E40C5-45C9-4995-ACB3-4C5B08EF0057Q39603522-054A9134-7A9A-4F36-9117-6BBDBB5763AEQ45959676-516134C4-830A-413C-BD19-1E36FC0023F6Q46233959-566FF4DB-D71F-46D9-B8D0-5E5BAB60924BQ46258744-B89FEC5A-AB0F-44F6-AF10-ACB815CD4D31Q47416182-4AF89552-6661-4E11-A9B2-48281CF80858Q47852898-52111AB0-BEE1-4DEF-9133-39EFF832289EQ47962837-EB5A8189-87E3-4D4E-ABE7-3D52A71A15D1Q48407124-9356C2A5-0E49-4E34-BF68-82984B7BBE88Q48428361-BE346ACA-E103-4C36-B694-9E75C354DA28Q50579885-5DC4652E-5B35-4B89-BD13-BD94BE14D5C5Q50638370-11EC7FFA-C9F4-4B16-9F68-EB949DC7A9ACQ50877753-7E7FF85D-BEC7-46C1-8F28-D8B4150B6203Q55171897-A0EE6BB5-2925-4D0B-A16A-1D8AE1DF41C7Q56143302-602F84ED-BEA9-49C6-A96E-34F780F558DBQ56156486-206F1DFA-73E3-40C1-AA07-088CC828AAD0Q57591914-5D2818F7-41F0-4AF2-BF6A-EA9C31209E1CQ57916289-975C611B-0EF2-42E9-B5AE-685A2A0608C7Q57916293-60B6436A-8998-4D01-AE4F-B226F49D928FQ57985311-1D24173F-2B19-41EB-8D69-2DB4024D3F66Q58221347-66FEF78C-2FB4-471B-B63C-0C4C384AF981Q59163378-C70EC490-979E-4366-A826-82338BE5137A
P2860
Anger and guilt about ingroup advantage explain the willingness for political action.
description
2006 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2006年の論文
@ja
2006年学术文章
@wuu
2006年学术文章
@zh-cn
2006年学术文章
@zh-hans
2006年学术文章
@zh-my
2006年学术文章
@zh-sg
2006年學術文章
@yue
2006年學術文章
@zh
2006年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Anger and guilt about ingroup advantage explain the willingness for political action.
@en
Anger and guilt about ingroup advantage explain the willingness for political action.
@nl
type
label
Anger and guilt about ingroup advantage explain the willingness for political action.
@en
Anger and guilt about ingroup advantage explain the willingness for political action.
@nl
prefLabel
Anger and guilt about ingroup advantage explain the willingness for political action.
@en
Anger and guilt about ingroup advantage explain the willingness for political action.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P356
P1476
Anger and guilt about ingroup advantage explain the willingness for political action.
@en
P2093
Aarti Iyer
Anne Pedersen
Colin Wayne Leach
P2860
P304
P356
10.1177/0146167206289729
P577
2006-09-01T00:00:00Z