about
Influence of Computer-Aided Detection on Performance of Screening MammographyComputer-aided classification of breast masses: performance and interobserver variability of expert radiologists versus residents.Misclassification of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Mammographic Density and Implications for Breast Density Reporting LegislationAssociation between radiologists' experience and accuracy in interpreting screening mammogramsHow does age affect baseline screening mammography performance measures? A decision model.Short-term hormone therapy suspension and mammography recall: a randomized trialInterpretation of positron emission mammography and MRI by experienced breast imaging radiologists: performance and observer reproducibilityTime trends in radiologists' interpretive performance at screening mammography from the community-based Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium, 1996-2004.Modelling the cumulative risk of a false-positive screening test.Autoantibodies to tumor-associated antigens in breast carcinoma.Autoantibodies to tailor-made panels of tumor-associated antigens in breast carcinoma.Influence of annual interpretive volume on screening mammography performance in the United StatesUsing a tailored web-based intervention to set goals to reduce unnecessary recall.Educational interventions to improve screening mammography interpretation: a randomized controlled trialThe influence of mammographic technologists on radiologists' ability to interpret screening mammograms in community practiceAddressing the challenge of assessing physician-level screening performance: mammography as an example.Automated breast image classification using features from its discrete cosine transform.Radiologist characteristics associated with interpretive performance of diagnostic mammographyAccuracy of short-interval follow-up mammograms by patient and radiologist characteristics.Cumulative probability of false-positive recall or biopsy recommendation after 10 years of screening mammography: a cohort studyPositive predictive value of mammography: comparison of interpretations of screening and diagnostic images by the same radiologist and by different radiologists.Reactions to uncertainty and the accuracy of diagnostic mammography.Racial and Ethnic Disparity in Symptomatic Breast Cancer Awareness despite a Recent Screen: The Role of Tumor Biology and Mammography Facility Characteristics.Computer-assisted mammography feedback program (CAMFP) an electronic tool for continuing medical education.Evaluation of breast amorphous calcifications by a computer-aided detection system in full-field digital mammography.Evaluating markers for the early detection of cancer: overview of study designs and methods.Sensitivity and specificity of mammographic screening as practised in Vermont and Norway.Patient and Radiologist Characteristics Associated With Accuracy of Two Types of Diagnostic Mammograms.Potentially missed detection with screening mammography: does the quality of radiologist's interpretation vary by patient socioeconomic advantage/disadvantage?Impact of an educational intervention designed to reduce unnecessary recall during screening mammography.Breast imaging fellowships in the United States: who, what, and where?Determinants of the number of mammography units in 31 countries with significant mammography screening.Accuracy of diagnostic mammography at facilities serving vulnerable women.Comparative effectiveness of digital versus film-screen mammography in community practice in the United States: a cohort study.National lung screening trial: variability in nodule detection rates in chest CT studies.Statistical approaches for modeling radiologists' interpretive performance.Comparing screening mammography for early breast cancer detection in Vermont and Norway.An Antibody-based Blood Test Utilizing a Panel of Biomarkers as a New Method for Improved Breast Cancer Diagnosis.When radiologists perform best: the learning curve in screening mammogram interpretation.Variability in interpretive performance at screening mammography and radiologists' characteristics associated with accuracy.
P2860
Q29540997-7BCE2B03-67AB-4F1D-962A-56B774566E45Q30471855-D7F9816B-AB9E-41DA-B506-D752381F341DQ30978115-3841E732-E430-4835-9DB9-75F51D60B491Q33330999-D26F5A54-AB97-4AAF-B9B9-0686F67A8D30Q33370698-D4B776BC-1DD7-410C-8F79-CD29D9ECA44BQ33577256-95EF3C60-BFD7-43D5-ADE9-8E311E763433Q33654503-6A9542E5-0218-42B8-B0E0-CE78BC5334D3Q33964312-E7756BB9-68B1-4632-B9E5-937E12FE6C1DQ34044186-2D8A377C-05AB-46AE-BF1C-2315B59BAAF8Q34339160-6815DFF4-5651-495C-A57A-36BD3428812FQ34665049-3A0873EC-CD6A-4501-A1AC-3C74610C2F05Q34724004-3008037E-75D0-4865-9FF7-C2CDDD52D754Q34731320-1E07B89F-456F-4297-B60C-9AA31B769269Q34770968-DF1A8F18-A510-48A9-83F1-642D53B283C7Q35071440-BF566545-804C-4E91-AE13-6BC177C29EAEQ35107272-7581AD8F-3254-4624-BB15-890F7D06F4A3Q35121782-B00C799F-73BF-4955-AC01-740734D7DA26Q35131036-3ADFFB34-7FC0-4304-8F87-CCB6DD05E56AQ35140687-1C9245C7-D97D-4F5D-A375-25CFCE6BC0D0Q35532803-B88A00F9-8C04-4FE4-B4FC-F6424D3465A1Q35672443-264829D1-5666-40FC-8F61-1AC86A818893Q35683110-0EDC5902-CE66-4649-BF8C-4EDD67717C96Q36118014-CDB4FED0-C441-4CAC-B698-D19564508050Q36173976-0D2A6709-BE99-460F-BD5C-6423E799F164Q36343851-1F13AD91-3C97-4A4B-B890-DC52A6B5083AQ36421984-0BC02EBA-DF74-4911-A8A8-AA1780A9FD7DQ36727156-0043623D-F668-4E9A-AB27-520F37478077Q36733622-32E25821-024B-44DD-B6F5-130B4B5AA213Q36787907-62533758-21D0-4BBD-975E-CEB87401F8C3Q36802395-141C8661-147F-4615-AA96-F60F0C66AF5CQ36824894-0E5CFEA5-6AA8-4F88-B384-B0900069094AQ36935979-D67F1341-FCBC-4B2B-8AB7-69E5B9B8A847Q36947489-9B2FC916-3C42-479F-B271-A74C0E7DD973Q37054183-59F82CA1-7F4C-4E01-B5FA-F675A5206C47Q37113252-8F02C742-FDE1-4F9D-B568-C018B558A208Q37122048-47E6AFBA-5CB4-4C8C-921B-F1E99675DBCAQ37288821-469B8BF1-E8A4-483C-9724-0132FEF83E71Q37373365-FDE03CAA-5780-441C-AE7F-DA00609AD1E6Q37450149-34B8684F-D614-44B8-8631-36D483B6E9A1Q37450161-645603EE-31E8-477F-A8C9-4892E6368C05
P2860
description
2005 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2005年の論文
@ja
2005年学术文章
@wuu
2005年学术文章
@zh
2005年学术文章
@zh-cn
2005年学术文章
@zh-hans
2005年学术文章
@zh-my
2005年学术文章
@zh-sg
2005年學術文章
@yue
2005年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Physician predictors of mammographic accuracy.
@en
Physician predictors of mammographic accuracy.
@nl
type
label
Physician predictors of mammographic accuracy.
@en
Physician predictors of mammographic accuracy.
@nl
prefLabel
Physician predictors of mammographic accuracy.
@en
Physician predictors of mammographic accuracy.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P356
P1476
Physician predictors of mammographic accuracy.
@en
P2093
Berta Geller
Chris Quale
Diana L Miglioretti
Edward A Sickles
Gary Cutter
Karla Kerlikowske
Peter Bacchetti
Philip Chu
Rebecca Smith-Bindman
Robert D Rosenberg
P2860
P304
P356
10.1093/JNCI/DJI060
P407
P577
2005-03-01T00:00:00Z