Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions.

about

Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions.

Item

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q47114826

description

2017 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2017年の論文

@ja

2017年学术文章

@wuu

2017年学术文章

@zh

2017年学术文章

@zh-cn

2017年学术文章

@zh-hans

2017年学术文章

@zh-my

2017年学术文章

@zh-sg

2017年學術文章

@yue

2017年學術文章

@zh-hant

name

Abstract analysis method facil ...... ws on psoriasis interventions.

@en

Abstract analysis method facil ...... ws on psoriasis interventions.

@nl

type

Item

label

Abstract analysis method facil ...... ws on psoriasis interventions.

@en

Abstract analysis method facil ...... ws on psoriasis interventions.

@nl

prefLabel

Abstract analysis method facil ...... ws on psoriasis interventions.

@en

Abstract analysis method facil ...... ws on psoriasis interventions.

@nl

P1476

Abstract analysis method facil ...... ews on psoriasis interventions

@en

P2093

Antonio Vélez García-Nieto

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Beatriz Isla-Tejera

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Beatriz Maestre-López

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Francisco Gómez-García

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

José Luis Hernández-Romero

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Juan Ruano

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Marcelino González-Padilla

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Patricia Alcalde-Mellado

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Pedro J Carmona-Fernández

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration

Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry.

PRISMA for Abstracts: reporting systematic reviews in journal and conference abstracts.

Evaluation of the endorsement of the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement on the quality of published systematic review and meta-analyses

Reporting quality in abstracts of meta-analyses of depression screening tool accuracy: a review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses

Longitudinal analysis of reporting and quality of systematic reviews in high-impact surgical journals.

ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed

Evidence synthesis for decision making 1: introduction.

A comparison of quality of abstracts of systematic reviews including meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in high-impact general medicine journals before and after the publication of PRISMA extension for abstracts: a systematic review and m

Effect of using reporting guidelines during peer review on quality of final manuscripts submitted to a biomedical journal: masked randomised trial

P2888

s12874-017-0460-z

P304

180

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1186/S12874-017-0460-Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Jesús Gay-Mimbrera

Macarena Aguilar-Luque

Juan Luís Sanz-Cabanillas

P577

2017-12-29T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P6179

1100107811

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

29284417

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P921

bias

P932

5747101

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string