about
Why do we need Evidence-Based Methods in Cochrane?Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventionsBias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventionsCommunity-based self-management programs for improving participation in life activities in older adults with chronic conditionsNewer generation antidepressants for depressive disorders in children and adolescentsContinuous quality improvement: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomesSelective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) for depressive disorders in children and adolescentsAn empirical investigation of the potential impact of selective inclusion of results in systematic reviews of interventions: study protocolInvesting in updating: how do conclusions change when Cochrane systematic reviews are updated?Accelerometers for the Assessment of Concussion in Male Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Hand sanitiser provision for reducing illness absences in primary school children: a cluster randomised trial.Improving the care for people with acute low-back pain by allied health professionals (the ALIGN trial): A cluster randomised trial protocolEvidence-based care of older people with suspected cognitive impairment in general practice: protocol for the IRIS cluster randomised trial.Do alternative methods for analysing count data produce similar estimates? Implications for meta-analyses.Obstacles to researching the researchers: a case study of the ethical challenges of undertaking methodological research investigating the reporting of randomised controlled trials.The use of segmented regression in analysing interrupted time series studies: an example in pre-hospital ambulance careAn investigation of the impact of using different methods for network meta-analysis: a protocol for an empirical evaluationRecruitment difficulties in a primary care cluster randomised trial: investigating factors contributing to general practitioners' recruitment of patients.Implementing evidence-based recommended practices for the management of patients with mild traumatic brain injuries in Australian emergency care departments: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trialThe use of the cluster randomized crossover design in clinical trials: protocol for a systematic review.Meta-analysis and The Cochrane Collaboration: 20 years of the Cochrane Statistical Methods GroupEvaluation of a theory-informed implementation intervention for the management of acute low back pain in general medical practice: the IMPLEMENT cluster randomised trial.Economic evaluation of active implementation versus guideline dissemination for evidence-based care of acute low-back pain in a general practice settingManagement of people with acute low-back pain: a survey of Australian chiropractorsEvidence map of studies evaluating methods for conducting, interpreting and reporting overviews of systematic reviews of interventions: rationale and design.Developing theory-informed behaviour change interventions to implement evidence into practice: a systematic approach using the Theoretical Domains FrameworkCore domain and outcome measurement sets for shoulder pain trials are needed: systematic review of physical therapy trials.Improving the care of people with traumatic brain injury through the Neurotrauma Evidence Translation (NET) program: protocol for a program of research.Protocol for economic evaluation alongside the IMPLEMENT cluster randomised controlled trial.IMPLEmenting a clinical practice guideline for acute low back pain evidence-based manageMENT in general practice (IMPLEMENT): cluster randomised controlled trial study protocol.Exercise therapy, manual therapy, or both, for osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: a factorial randomised controlled trial protocol.The quality of reporting in cluster randomised crossover trials: proposal for reporting items and an assessment of reporting qualityImpact of analysing continuous outcomes using final values, change scores and analysis of covariance on the performance of meta-analytic methods: a simulation study.Development and validation of SEER (Seeking, Engaging with and Evaluating Research): a measure of policymakers' capacity to engage with and use research.Many scenarios exist for selective inclusion and reporting of results in randomized trials and systematic reviews.Methods to select results to include in meta-analyses deserve more consideration in systematic reviews.Appropriate statistical methods were infrequently used in cluster-randomized crossover trials.Retrieval of overviews of systematic reviews in MEDLINE was improved by the development of an objectively derived and validated search strategy.Introduction to systematic reviews and meta-analysis.Investigation of bias in meta-analyses due to selective inclusion of trial effect estimates: empirical study.
P50
Q24188293-27B924C8-C483-4632-905E-4F68A8A422D4Q24193207-3FE779EF-3819-48E9-97FA-CA618D0676C3Q24198908-D1D2543D-B7E7-4220-9CD2-E664DCE0E2EEQ24200952-2232CD20-EB36-4ED9-B608-CA447BB326FEQ24202873-520743EF-0785-4B46-B99C-80B4FEFDCA2EQ24241182-1B4A7F2A-9E71-4858-8335-3EE6AF80374DQ24244127-1A37B69D-EBA2-4BCE-8DF0-D9289EF8EE8CQ24633869-38BC83AD-F0A4-4DF5-A57C-0AA4EBBF6AD8Q24812186-735E773F-1FD4-43F9-95BB-280EEA9CAA5EQ30249046-E0E48B14-42E2-4D68-BFCB-6B598A097347Q30365635-3417F083-0662-4BA3-8203-A25F47671BDBQ30497512-3C33E2D3-6154-4862-AA57-DB7F25CB06E4Q30544183-5F51FB5A-EEFB-467D-A790-91B392BBB6E8Q31024883-24554597-107A-4862-9F77-58223DDC09F3Q33758588-F320BE2F-98D1-400F-AAA5-4B5066BEDE4CQ33798699-0F44F684-8346-4D3B-9AC9-81CAC431B4E9Q33831023-FAC6FB75-48CE-4CB7-96C7-EA78E36094F0Q33859052-28624D75-C164-46F4-9CAE-6DBF8E164ADFQ33938604-BC7FDCBD-0237-46A6-A641-8F5CCE667A35Q34068173-6386D35B-E647-4B5B-8462-061B97AF41EEQ34447636-DE22E4BD-0CE2-42DF-A2AA-391E2CC06521Q34778706-56EF3CB4-F9B7-49F8-9043-2A32A55EB02FQ35022443-CC317FE1-828E-4125-A97B-616C2DCE1E8EQ35692728-74516C81-B0FC-44A6-980C-DB4700180FC2Q35887528-63D14223-24A1-4AD0-B656-D158BA67E891Q36235988-B6BE9E86-1AB9-4AE1-9A3E-1E890C7FF973Q36459560-EB4C7496-07AF-489D-B85B-B6D58A36E8DAQ36527192-7EF7B500-FC10-4121-B61E-2E1B74A7EBACQ36532638-119DAAA0-59A0-4C55-8F72-5A57E3E9514DQ36535297-358E6949-55F0-4794-B82D-C401BF045367Q37102211-7FA87816-92BF-43C8-857D-3C0F9683B213Q37480719-A1BDAA31-9584-4E5B-99E6-343784AC6000Q37565683-8499E187-392C-43C0-B3D3-6FF12B5E3DD0Q37589356-F7523395-DA34-4D4C-979B-64357FFD07E1Q38075742-2FB01809-D151-4F48-BE2A-E1F1985C35C8Q38405509-82C3832F-4B97-43C2-A243-A43A7774C937Q38658056-A3AE9AB6-C979-4701-A91B-5421B3794B61Q38684977-D2956695-B832-4517-A925-26B6CA63E398Q38813449-B212C4BD-071B-485D-B0E1-1803505880EAQ38819296-40E97756-F3EC-4639-9CAC-A1B7A60A0017
P50
description
hulumtuese
@sq
onderzoeker
@nl
researcher
@en
ricercatrice
@it
հետազոտող
@hy
name
Joanne E. McKenzie
@ast
Joanne E. McKenzie
@en
Joanne E. McKenzie
@es
Joanne E. McKenzie
@nl
Joanne E. McKenzie
@sl
type
label
Joanne E. McKenzie
@ast
Joanne E. McKenzie
@en
Joanne E. McKenzie
@es
Joanne E. McKenzie
@nl
Joanne E. McKenzie
@sl
prefLabel
Joanne E. McKenzie
@ast
Joanne E. McKenzie
@en
Joanne E. McKenzie
@es
Joanne E. McKenzie
@nl
Joanne E. McKenzie
@sl
P244
P1053
I-2925-2014
P106
P1153
7202100187
P21
P214
5623153411841941700009
P244
no2018103835
P31
P3829
P496
0000-0003-3534-1641
P734
P735
P7859
lccn-no2018103835