Gender difference with the use of percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients undergoing complex high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: From pVAD Working Group.

about

Gender difference with the use of percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients undergoing complex high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: From pVAD Working Group.

Item

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q47195078

description

2018 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2018年の論文

@ja

2018年学术文章

@wuu

2018年学术文章

@zh

2018年学术文章

@zh-cn

2018年学术文章

@zh-hans

2018年学术文章

@zh-my

2018年学术文章

@zh-sg

2018年學術文章

@yue

2018年學術文章

@zh-hant

name

Gender difference with the use ...... tion: From pVAD Working Group.

@en

Gender difference with the use ...... tion: From pVAD Working Group.

@nl

type

Item

label

Gender difference with the use ...... tion: From pVAD Working Group.

@en

Gender difference with the use ...... tion: From pVAD Working Group.

@nl

prefLabel

Gender difference with the use ...... tion: From pVAD Working Group.

@en

Gender difference with the use ...... tion: From pVAD Working Group.

@nl

P1476

Gender difference with the use ...... ntion: From pVAD Working Group

@en

P2093

Avneet Singh

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Perwaiz M Meraj

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Rajiv Jauhar

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

2015 SCAI/ACC/HFSA/STS Clinical Expert Consensus Statement on the Use of Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Cardiovascular Care: Endorsed by the American Heart Assocation, the Cardiological Society of India, and Sociedad Latino A

Drug-eluting stents vs. coronary-artery bypass grafting in multivessel coronary disease

Optimal Timing of Complete Revascularization in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Coronary artery bypass surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (the Stent or Surgery trial): a randomised controlled trial.

The current use of Impella 2.5 in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: results from the USpella Registry

Impact of the presence and extent of incomplete angiographic revascularization after percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndromes: the Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy (ACUITY) trial.

Randomized trial of complete versus lesion-only revascularization in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI and multivessel disease: the CvLPRIT trial.

The NCDR CathPCI Registry: a US national perspective on care and outcomes for percutaneous coronary intervention.

Complete versus culprit-only revascularization in patients with multi-vessel disease undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized trials.

A prospective, randomized clinical trial of hemodynamic support with Impella 2.5 versus intra-aortic balloon pump in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: the PROTECT II study.

P304

369-378

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1177/2048872617745790

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Rajkumar Doshi

P577

2018-01-08T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P698

29308660

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string