about
Retroposed elements as archives for the evolutionary history of placental mammals.Long-branch attraction bias and inconsistency in Bayesian phylogeneticsPhylogenetic support values are not necessarily informative: the case of the Serialia hypothesis (a mollusk phylogeny)Shooting darts: co-evolution and counter-adaptation in hermaphroditic snails.Origin and evolution of Kinesin-like calmodulin-binding proteinHigher-order phylogeny of modern birds (Theropoda, Aves: Neornithes) based on comparative anatomy. II. Analysis and discussionMitochondrial genomes suggest that hexapods and crustaceans are mutually paraphyleticA configuration space of homologous proteins conserving mutual information and allowing a phylogeny inference based on pair-wise Z-score probabilitiesThe Origin of Large-Bodied Shrimp that Dominate Modern Global AquacultureThe relationships of the Euparkeriidae and the rise of ArchosauriaAn extreme case of plant-insect codiversification: figs and fig-pollinating wasps.Evaluating multiple criteria for species delimitation: an empirical example using Hawaiian palms (Arecaceae: Pritchardia)Evolution of exceptional species richness among lineages of fleshy-fruited MyrtaceaeVisualizing differences in phylogenetic information content of alignments and distinction of three classes of long-branch effectsMulti-locus phylogeny of dolphins in the subfamily Lissodelphininae: character synergy improves phylogenetic resolutionAlmeidea A. St.-Hil. belongs to Conchocarpus J.C. Mikan (Galipeinae, Rutaceae): evidence from morphological and molecular data, with a first analysis of subtribe GalipeinaeWidespread distribution of a unique marine protistan lineage.Fomitiporia castilloi sp. nov. and multiple clades around F. apiahyna and F. texana in Meso- and South America evidenced by multiloci phylogenetic inferences.Hymenochaetaceae from the Guineo-Congolian rainforest: three new species of Phylloporia based on morphological, DNA sequences and ecological data.Resolving deep phylogenetic relationships in salamanders: analyses of mitochondrial and nuclear genomic data.Multilocus, DNA-based phylogenetic analyses reveal three new species lineages in the Phellinus gabonensis-P. caribaeo-quercicola species complex, including P. amazonicus sp. nov.Molecular and morphological analysis of Myxobolus spp. of salmonid fishes with the description of a new Myxobolus species.Fomitiporia in sub-Saharan Africa: morphology and multigene phylogenetic analysis support three new species from the Guineo-Congolian rainforest.Identification of 'extinct' freshwater mussel species using DNA barcoding.Comprehensive comparative analysis of kinesins in photosynthetic eukaryotesWhy do phylogenomic data sets yield conflicting trees? Data type influences the avian tree of life more than taxon sampling.Ribosomal and Mitochondrial DNA Analyses of Xiphinema americanum-Group PopulationsIntegrative species delimitation in photosynthetic sea slugs reveals twenty candidate species in three nominal taxa studied for drug discovery, plastid symbiosis or biological controlAncient origins of vertebrate-specific innate antiviral immunity.The Calibrated Phylogeny of the Drosophila fasciola Subgroup (D. repleta Group Wasserman) Indicates Neogene Diversification of Its Internal Branches.Reticulate evolution in diploid and tetraploid species of Polystachya (Orchidaceae) as shown by plastid DNA sequences and low-copy nuclear genes.Empirical evaluation of a prior for Bayesian phylogenetic inferenceCombined mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences resolve the interrelations of the major Australasian marsupial radiations.The influence of model averaging on clade posteriors: an example using the triggerfishes (Family Balistidae).Phylogenomics.Recent evolutionary diversification of a protist lineage.Fundamental differences between the methods of maximum likelihood and maximum posterior probability in phylogenetics.Visualizing conflicting evolutionary hypotheses in large collections of trees: using consensus networks to study the origins of placentals and hexapods.Branch-length prior influences Bayesian posterior probability of phylogeny.Phylogenetic relationships of Dalyat mirabilis Mateu, 2002, with a revised molecular phylogeny of ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae)
P2860
Q21092781-FBE336CB-19FE-4440-95BC-457E2C7D7C61Q21142701-611BBD8E-0878-49C3-A739-209AA40E55CDQ21231978-49E1F11E-2A25-4D8D-B864-4546C48AB03BQ21283969-AEB2999C-658F-4477-8A9A-49DD59155E26Q24531445-FFB7E51C-2FDD-4D67-830A-9E80AEA8BD4EQ24643849-E1D19BCF-5E3E-4EA9-9F6E-E60B6FAB82B8Q24673556-D91A5665-1B18-49FB-9DEC-97B63326179DQ24804871-B11639BB-4B22-44AE-910E-1AF93E9CA6D1Q28596251-0EBB5810-EA0C-437B-82A8-B064D5A3AF58Q28601219-5EBF40A1-8F41-439A-BBAD-1EB3CDCB33A6Q28715729-2E0A3399-CAC1-42C6-93E8-7E52C764AF64Q28729886-519388BE-E5A7-4004-B258-5B253926971BQ28751313-6D55D67F-726B-4F41-B57B-62678293B513Q28756834-FBCF5499-0AD3-4472-B912-AB61AD27AF0CQ28766800-4B3D59AA-839D-483F-A282-E80B08C0CB3DQ30000336-21E8A63A-DFDB-4E4C-A2C4-2FBE222312D0Q30494229-B3187015-4E08-405E-BB0B-7D0038CE76D7Q30633198-EB9C2BCB-7665-4D77-8958-76E545E39FA0Q30984898-24E14172-E459-4A73-9398-A5F0EADE5FADQ31012780-9B675564-4D49-40D7-B34B-D3F8413AD7B0Q31118572-6B393937-585A-47FB-931E-1310C5C520BDQ33398089-78A5F991-331D-4833-9D9A-5FEAED6A7DAFQ33718143-3CCFDBE8-7CF5-48F1-B881-DDBE42EE6A14Q33903003-46380C6B-1F08-46EB-81DF-35E8F6AD6998Q34534092-3B3D6CA4-BEFD-44BE-9B3C-6BB938898610Q36332268-F5518BD3-BA85-46DD-8440-1D0BD94295DAQ36981480-3A963C12-3BF6-4BDA-B9AE-9CD97D2C2915Q37209948-81A2EA38-9351-4D03-93D8-0E9DB9335B30Q37428428-D75CF403-6B91-4F24-B481-4518D954C98CQ38987711-3C93542B-0360-4A33-A187-F6DC74A4EB41Q41283181-4DFAFA0D-3825-47A6-B8C5-1400F7BBDFB7Q42087581-B4455385-2F9B-4EC0-902B-3674544A3526Q43455802-AA3388A9-DFC0-49DA-8096-4D945CD9C79CQ45303976-C318AD72-9E2B-46AE-B0F4-48EFDE792660Q47249240-E80FDE4E-E1C9-4C16-9F14-3551F719B126Q51693326-9736FA30-D3B9-4ADF-B9F4-C168D3E0E40AQ51948631-37CF3C74-821B-4C9E-9BC3-121AE9295AD2Q51976981-1D01AAB7-857C-4FEC-877D-2F1D3D456650Q52979681-35C7CEAE-29AB-4242-A3C4-B3F5D57D5CA6Q54539685-1E5F4FD4-1A3A-40F2-9CE0-E84D8A11BDDC
P2860
description
2003 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2003年の論文
@ja
2003年学术文章
@wuu
2003年学术文章
@zh
2003年学术文章
@zh-cn
2003年学术文章
@zh-hans
2003年学术文章
@zh-my
2003年学术文章
@zh-sg
2003年學術文章
@yue
2003年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
How meaningful are Bayesian support values?
@en
How meaningful are Bayesian support values?
@nl
type
label
How meaningful are Bayesian support values?
@en
How meaningful are Bayesian support values?
@nl
prefLabel
How meaningful are Bayesian support values?
@en
How meaningful are Bayesian support values?
@nl
P2093
P2860
P356
P1476
How meaningful are Bayesian support values?
@en
P2093
Kurt M Pickett
Mark P Simmons
Masaki Miya
P2860
P304
P356
10.1093/MOLBEV/MSH014
P577
2003-10-31T00:00:00Z