Femoral head size is a risk factor for total hip luxation: a study of 42,987 primary hip arthroplasties from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.
about
Operative and non-operative treatment options for dislocation of the hip following total hip arthroplastyPosterior versus lateral surgical approach for total hip arthroplasty in adults with osteoarthritisComparison of bipolar hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures in the healthy elderly: a meta-analysisThe Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association: a unique collaboration between 3 national hip arthroplasty registries with 280,201 THRsPatient-reported outcome after total hip arthroplasty: comparison between lateral and posterior approach.Alumina-on-alumina total hip replacement for femoral neck fracture in healthy patients.Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty with 28 and 32-mm femoral head.Functional outcome following a large head total hip arthroplasty: A retrospective analysis of mid term results.Worse patient-reported outcome after lateral approach than after anterior and posterolateral approach in primary hip arthroplasty. A cross-sectional questionnaire study of 1,476 patients 1-3 years after surgery.Constrained liner in neurologic or cognitively impaired patients undergoing primary THA.Risk of dislocation using large- vs. small-diameter femoral heads in total hip arthroplastyCompensation claims for chiropractic in Denmark and Norway 2004-2012Risk factors for revision of primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.Effect of femoral head size on metal-on-HXLPE hip arthroplasty outcome in a combined analysis of six national and regional registries.Dual mobility acetabular component in revision total hip arthroplasty for persistent dislocation: no dislocations in 50 hips after 1-5 years.No functional benefit of larger femoral heads and alternative bearings at 6 months following primary hip replacement.Improved results of primary total hip replacement.Dutch guideline on total hip prosthesisIs an algorithmic approach to the treatment of recurrent dislocation after THA effective?Modified minimally invasive two-incision total hip arthroplasty using large diameter femoral head.Less wear with aluminium-oxide heads than cobalt-chrome heads with ultra high molecular weight cemented polyethylene cups: a ten-year follow-up with radiostereometry.Short-term outcome after posterior versus lateral surgical approach for total hip arthroplasty - A randomized clinical trial.Survival of uncemented acetabular monoblock cups: evaluation of 210 hips in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.The risk of revision due to dislocation after total hip arthroplasty depends on surgical approach, femoral head size, sex, and primary diagnosis. An analysis of 78,098 operations in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.The type of surgical approach influences the risk of revision in total hip arthroplasty: a study from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register of 90,662 total hipreplacements with 3 different cemented prosthesesHigh wear rates and extensive osteolysis in 3 types of uncemented total hip arthroplasty: a review of the PCA, the Harris Galante and the Profile/Tri-Lock Plus arthroplasties with a minimum of 12 years median follow-up in 96 hips.Late dislocation after total hip arthroplastyLate dislocation is associated with recurrence after total hip arthroplasty.Muscular strength after total hip arthroplasty. A prospective comparison of 3 surgical approaches.Effect of femoral head size on risk of revision for dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: a population-based analysis of 42,379 primary procedures from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.More than 50% reduction of wear in polyethylene liners with alumina heads compared to cobalt-chrome heads in hip replacements: a 10-year follow-up with radiostereometry in 43 hips.Ideal femoral head size in total hip arthroplasty balances stability and volumetric wearEffect of femoral head size and surgical approach on risk of revision for dislocation after total hip arthroplasty.Total hip arthroplasty instability treatment without dual mobility cups: brief overview and experience of other options.Low Frequency of Early Complications With Dual-mobility Acetabular Cups in Cementless Primary THALong-term survivorship and complication rate comparison of a cementless modular stem and cementless fixed neck stems for primary total hip replacement.Choice of approach, but not femoral head size, affects revision rate due to dislocations in THA after femoral neck fracture: results from the Lithuanian Arthroplasty Register.Short-term wear evaluation of thin acetabular liners on 36-mm femoral headsDual mobility cemented cups have low dislocation rates in THA revisions.The unstable total hip replacement.
P2860
Q24244105-C3B83AF0-E87F-43C6-AF04-A47EC0BE251CQ24245296-CA13E3E0-270A-482E-9525-D928B69C62C4Q26796480-DDDAEAAC-4415-4A7F-9753-D869E209DCB9Q33660035-131EFDA4-4C16-4C9C-8A83-710D776032B1Q33697017-0BBC889B-0E63-488F-B0EF-5F4D727DD2C7Q33810044-F5ECBC7B-028B-4043-BC7D-B6C29A8C10BDQ33959644-5B48F52D-6284-4C3E-B2B4-E57E101F5C32Q34064243-2F1B8FD4-1C42-4E80-A900-EE0819E154F9Q34185323-B0A567FF-D06D-4CA0-B9D9-789778B0C9F3Q34283811-E068B20B-F42B-4D81-8374-D154DA3B7C0CQ34434988-F030711E-1689-4318-96C7-AFAE0C8E55E9Q34484689-6F2F8B5A-6031-4E85-9D1D-39646A081097Q34513243-7181DF64-E20E-4FA6-8E26-DF28158C53D8Q34739598-1E32DA61-2C3F-4627-B6FF-4BD5C8621F91Q35143846-C0808514-B7E6-44BA-AB7D-51B6D00AB28FQ35197624-A917008D-C0B6-4AF8-8F8E-A6FA09AEB48FQ35550040-98373FD6-96B7-42B5-A32A-A76FACECC824Q35624415-BE3DDCFC-D759-423F-BC14-CCED0926FEB2Q35663350-71CCD771-FBBA-43BF-8A74-E06DCF503CC5Q35726527-9F5E7BE5-6F99-4A86-89D7-DB5AEE6184DFQ35794979-08C319B7-931E-436E-B437-6700A0C35B14Q35959290-6ED3B259-FF4C-49B8-936C-5BF1CFA06875Q36013580-B74C4122-0D6A-4C6F-8849-DDE6BF658EA0Q36368568-4D5438BF-ADC3-4ACD-B4F7-57004CEA1DDFQ36563768-CD26AF70-9831-4C71-AA9F-889D776A4F98Q36575485-6CF81A56-A85E-47DA-8105-FD13381BC3E3Q36740833-E80414B8-8542-414B-82FF-9802150AD161Q37057550-A6E8E26D-8CBE-4A08-A291-C1FC69B16130Q37084412-48835C4C-6E27-46C1-BB7C-BC66C3E24A86Q37158369-AA45029F-9985-400F-8228-3DAA065D5DADQ37158380-017B4465-E1BF-4358-90BC-4475B0235DCAQ38148159-9EC50AA4-D7E9-4488-8B22-BD0712AAB8BBQ38821064-CE45B145-E1B6-4BA3-9FB2-3006FEF7D3B9Q39090244-5D07D674-0521-433E-9711-6BC2272608F7Q40702664-D8C49957-B165-44B3-ABD4-30AE4806478FQ41601661-8CA79F8F-DB67-4B76-9DCC-B4E3365B8003Q41685265-2C9AA291-E9B1-4290-B76D-4E04AAFAE6B7Q41825356-CF940D94-BA09-4284-AD18-09592532A402Q42155510-91E0270C-4D8D-4BFD-ABA3-BF6B1BC63ABDQ42548641-A8C20F92-32C7-4EEA-BD7B-BAE70CCB91C1
P2860
Femoral head size is a risk factor for total hip luxation: a study of 42,987 primary hip arthroplasties from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.
description
2003 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2003年の論文
@ja
2003年学术文章
@wuu
2003年学术文章
@zh-cn
2003年学术文章
@zh-hans
2003年学术文章
@zh-my
2003年学术文章
@zh-sg
2003年學術文章
@yue
2003年學術文章
@zh
2003年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Femoral head size is a risk fa ...... rwegian Arthroplasty Register.
@en
Femoral head size is a risk fa ...... rwegian Arthroplasty Register.
@nl
type
label
Femoral head size is a risk fa ...... rwegian Arthroplasty Register.
@en
Femoral head size is a risk fa ...... rwegian Arthroplasty Register.
@nl
prefLabel
Femoral head size is a risk fa ...... rwegian Arthroplasty Register.
@en
Femoral head size is a risk fa ...... rwegian Arthroplasty Register.
@nl
P2093
P1433
P1476
Femoral head size is a risk fa ...... rwegian Arthroplasty Register.
@en
P2093
Birgitte Espehaug
Leif I Havelin
Norwegian Arthroplasty Register
Ove Furnes
Sven Byström
P304
P356
10.1080/00016470310017893
P577
2003-10-01T00:00:00Z