Classification of normal screening mammograms is strongly influenced by perceived mammographic breast density.

about

Classification of normal screening mammograms is strongly influenced by perceived mammographic breast density.

Item

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q48031683

description

2017 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2017年の論文

@ja

2017年学术文章

@wuu

2017年学术文章

@zh

2017年学术文章

@zh-cn

2017年学术文章

@zh-hans

2017年学术文章

@zh-my

2017年学术文章

@zh-sg

2017年學術文章

@yue

2017年學術文章

@zh-hant

name

Classification of normal scree ...... d mammographic breast density.

@en

Classification of normal scree ...... d mammographic breast density.

@nl

type

Item

label

Classification of normal scree ...... d mammographic breast density.

@en

Classification of normal scree ...... d mammographic breast density.

@nl

prefLabel

Classification of normal scree ...... d mammographic breast density.

@en

Classification of normal scree ...... d mammographic breast density.

@nl

P1476

Classification of normal scree ...... d mammographic breast density.

@en

P2093

Mohammad A Rawashdeh

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Patrick C Brennan

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Rob Heard

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Sarah J Lewis

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Warwick Lee

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Zoey Zy Ang

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Mammographic screening for breast cancer: A review

Is single reading with computer-aided detection (CAD) as good as double reading in mammography screening? A systematic review

Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment.

Double reading.

Age- and race-dependence of the fibroglandular breast density analyzed on 3D MRI.

Influence of annual interpretive volume on screening mammography performance in the United States

Normal and pathological breast, the histological basis.

The normal breast and its variations in mammography.

Second reading of screening mammograms increases cancer detection and recall rates. Results in the Florence screening programme.

BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value.

P304

461-469

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1111/1754-9485.12576

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

2017-01-03T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P698

28052571

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string