A comparison of the responsiveness of 4 commonly used patient-reported outcome instruments at 5 years after matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation.
about
Development and Initial Validation of the Satisfaction and Recovery Index (SRI) for Measurement of Recovery from Musculoskeletal TraumaAllogeneic Articular Chondrocyte Transplantation Downregulates Interleukin 8 Gene Expression in the Degenerating Rabbit Intervertebral Disk In Vivo.No Clinically Important Difference in Knee Scores or Instability Between Transtibial and Inlay Techniques for PCL Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.A 20-Year Follow-up After First-Generation Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation.Low-impact sports activities are feasible after meniscus transplantation: a systematic review.How are we measuring clinically important outcome for operative treatments in sports medicine?Effect on Patient-Reported Outcomes of Debridement or Microfracture of Concomitant Full-Thickness Cartilage Lesions in Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Reconstructed Knees: A Nationwide Cohort Study From Norway and Sweden of 357 Patients With 2-Year FolloEffect of accelerated weightbearing after matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation on the femoral condyle: a prospective, randomized controlled study presenting MRI-based and clinical outcomes after 5 years.A Comparison of 2-Year Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Tibiofemoral or Patellofemoral Matrix-Induced Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation.Correlation Between Clinical and Radiological Outcomes After Matrix-Induced Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation in the Femoral Condyles.Incidence, degree, and development of graft hypertrophy 24 months after matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation: association with clinical outcomes.Statistics In Brief: Minimum Clinically Important Difference-Availability of Reliable Estimates.
P2860
Q34329717-C0C92CDD-5F46-4D36-A088-BA1B15160AB3Q35085332-BD063E9E-69F1-47AE-B89D-7FEA10971F81Q36206429-BC68F414-D669-4D59-83DE-7A74728E17EEQ38651546-369DEBC9-CC41-4C19-8BCD-BF6FC7D843CCQ38656160-DDFC22A2-70C0-4978-80E5-19376A7E3DEDQ38918463-71F93884-7366-4181-8648-52F00C112BB0Q40221106-B32F859D-139C-49F4-818F-9E71E8C7D118Q48060511-1E0A6FBD-C1F7-4B97-96D3-A9C313E94989Q48567613-A0362266-6226-4B22-A73F-340D3478658CQ50674378-DD4E3167-9B9F-41D8-9E8D-FCB3B58FE878Q51007206-A5243D49-B49A-489E-8444-05AF97528C33Q55080608-D636C1AA-743D-4F67-BC04-4757AF5457EA
P2860
A comparison of the responsiveness of 4 commonly used patient-reported outcome instruments at 5 years after matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation.
description
2013 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2013年の論文
@ja
2013年学术文章
@wuu
2013年学术文章
@zh-cn
2013年学术文章
@zh-hans
2013年学术文章
@zh-my
2013年学术文章
@zh-sg
2013年學術文章
@yue
2013年學術文章
@zh
2013年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
A comparison of the responsive ...... gous chondrocyte implantation.
@en
A comparison of the responsive ...... gous chondrocyte implantation.
@nl
type
label
A comparison of the responsive ...... gous chondrocyte implantation.
@en
A comparison of the responsive ...... gous chondrocyte implantation.
@nl
prefLabel
A comparison of the responsive ...... gous chondrocyte implantation.
@en
A comparison of the responsive ...... gous chondrocyte implantation.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P356
P1476
A comparison of the responsive ...... ogous chondrocyte implantation
@en
P2093
Anne Smith
David J Wood
Timothy R Ackland
P2860
P304
P356
10.1177/0363546513502314
P50
P577
2013-09-04T00:00:00Z