A comparison of the Nexfin® and transcardiopulmonary thermodilution to estimate cardiac output during coronary artery surgery.
about
Clinical review: Does it matter which hemodynamic monitoring system is used?Perioperative cardiovascular monitoring of high-risk patients: a consensus of 12FEV manoeuvre induced changes in breath VOC compositions: an unconventional view on lung function testsEvolving concepts of hemodynamic monitoring for critically ill patientsContinuous hemodynamic monitoring in acute stroke: an exploratory analysisAge-related reflex responses from peripheral and central chemoreceptors in healthy men.Reliability of a new 4th generation FloTrac algorithm to track cardiac output changes in patients receiving phenylephrine.Noninvasive pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation to predict fluid responsiveness at multiple thresholds: a prospective observational study.The haemodynamic effects of intravenous paracetamol (acetaminophen) in healthy volunteers: a double-blind, randomized, triple crossover trial.Non-invasive assessment of cardiac hemodynamics in patients with advanced cancer and with chronic heart failure: a pilot feasibility study.The estimation of cardiac output by the Nexfin device is of poor reliability for tracking the effects of a fluid challengeNon-invasive measurements of pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation in anesthetized patients using the Nexfin blood pressure monitor.Less invasive methods of advanced hemodynamic monitoring: principles, devices, and their role in the perioperative hemodynamic optimization.Noninvasive continuous hemodynamic monitoring.Non-invasive continuous blood pressure monitoring: a review of current applications.Non-invasive assessment of gestational hemodynamics: benefits and limitations of impedance cardiography versus other techniques.Pulse-contour derived cardiac output measurements in morbid obesity: influence of actual, ideal and adjusted bodyweight.A comparison of volume clamp method-based continuous noninvasive cardiac output (CNCO) measurement versus intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution in postoperative cardiothoracic surgery patients.Influence of menopause status and age on integrated central and peripheral hemodynamic responses to subsystolic cuffing during submaximal exercise.Continuous noninvasive cardiac output determination using the CNAP system: evaluation of a cardiac output algorithm for the analysis of volume clamp method-derived pulse contour.A pilot study of the relationship between Doppler-estimated carotid and brachial artery flow and cardiac index.Comparative Evaluation of Crystalloid Resuscitation Rate in a Human Model of Compensated Haemorrhagic Shock.Hemodynamics and tissue oxygenation during balanced anesthesia with a high antinociceptive contribution: an observational study.Interleukin-1 Blockade in Recently Decompensated Systolic Heart Failure: Results From REDHART (Recently Decompensated Heart Failure Anakinra Response Trial).Determinants of vascular and cardiac baroreflex sensitivity values in a random population sample.Assessment of changes in cardiac index and fluid responsiveness: a comparison of Nexfin and transpulmonary thermodilution.Assessment of an updated double-vasopressor automated system using Nexfin for the maintenance of haemodynamic stability to improve peri-operative outcome during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section.Do we need to monitor cardiac output in spontaneously breathing patients?Evaluation of cardiac output in intensive care using a non-invasive arterial pulse contour technique (Nexfin(®)) compared with echocardiography.Update on Finger-Application-Type Noninvasive Continuous Hemodynamic Monitors (CNAP and ccNexfin): Physical Principles, Validation, and Clinical Use.An autocalibrating algorithm for non-invasive cardiac output determination based on the analysis of an arterial pressure waveform recorded with radial artery applanation tonometry: a proof of concept pilot analysis.Nexfin noninvasive continuous hemodynamic monitoring: validation against continuous pulse contour and intermittent transpulmonary thermodilution derived cardiac output in critically ill patients.
P2860
Q27001703-15AF3B9A-1E7D-4605-A8BC-A828079C8543Q27011635-B814BE5B-9242-443F-8ABB-62C9D2B19C6EQ27339338-4DABCB7D-0263-45EA-A0D2-A6738B49E02CQ28081995-96C2B357-1333-4C1F-AF48-66978E63178DQ33910545-828B76F0-F351-4E15-A249-FE5FCC6D073EQ34635089-6D6F4498-CFD4-4F84-A752-131FD36626FCQ35231691-9F016AE7-4EA1-4D25-A8DA-CF4D5D3CC620Q36128063-5B56E134-F856-430A-A3E4-86B194749623Q36706777-5FC8DD9D-1DEA-4189-AF3E-EC7E1E66BE7CQ36829069-DD0E69C9-6FE0-45F7-AA65-25601E595826Q36928290-658D97C8-083E-4788-8B55-45C5000DF331Q37256602-F2A4D132-BC16-49C2-8311-9674589FC270Q37660543-043EA0CF-0F56-4581-845A-32B7EE231E1EQ38018511-05365C08-7601-46A4-8E9C-EC62D8D1439FQ38076358-AB9EEC65-368F-4182-9BBC-3903D3891292Q38160245-468080A7-1BE8-481D-90A5-913F4EE6FD5CQ38617837-1B9754CC-4E38-49B1-A48F-34A3E5FC3227Q38765946-313311CD-958B-44A2-B22A-5EFEFC02C824Q39265093-BFB102FC-3B56-4400-BCEA-ADA55EFE17C2Q40676983-1E5E23CB-990D-4A76-B2BA-C46290445355Q41717946-FC043BD8-3F3C-4019-9FE4-C4842D9D94DEQ41771472-7F5F0F54-C470-4309-AE52-22F4F93FB9E6Q41876462-81AB00DC-6294-40C0-A200-7D5398F8C456Q45073053-1A116D57-78FC-41B6-9041-CED26B936656Q45392725-73749E29-AD1E-4A7C-B14C-2F57BEE6B9D5Q46311918-C15CE33D-71AD-4450-9F78-FA6F258A57F8Q47756053-1284D503-A39E-4E7C-8BD3-EFCA5718A0A1Q47763338-1E259BCD-32E1-4457-B1D3-C59C04E70CACQ47992356-9B0C69B7-83E5-4E88-B729-EFA652FF472FQ50880947-6657AE1A-973E-41D7-BA62-9EF6377B9AB6Q51134693-7D509C04-8269-4E05-BBF1-8895E9000EC1Q54471598-06F0EF10-BF65-49AC-8FFF-850ACAFDCBD6
P2860
A comparison of the Nexfin® and transcardiopulmonary thermodilution to estimate cardiac output during coronary artery surgery.
description
2012 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2012年の論文
@ja
2012年学术文章
@wuu
2012年学术文章
@zh-cn
2012年学术文章
@zh-hans
2012年学术文章
@zh-my
2012年学术文章
@zh-sg
2012年學術文章
@yue
2012年學術文章
@zh
2012年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
A comparison of the Nexfin® an ...... uring coronary artery surgery.
@en
A comparison of the Nexfin® an ...... uring coronary artery surgery.
@nl
type
label
A comparison of the Nexfin® an ...... uring coronary artery surgery.
@en
A comparison of the Nexfin® an ...... uring coronary artery surgery.
@nl
prefLabel
A comparison of the Nexfin® an ...... uring coronary artery surgery.
@en
A comparison of the Nexfin® an ...... uring coronary artery surgery.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P1433
P1476
A comparison of the Nexfin® an ...... uring coronary artery surgery.
@en
P2093
J Schöttler
M Gruenewald
M Steinfath
P2860
P304
P356
10.1111/J.1365-2044.2011.07018.X
P407
P577
2012-02-11T00:00:00Z