More than cheating: deception, IRB shopping, and the normative legitimacy of IRBs.

about

Critical Analysis of Assessment Studies of the Animal Ethics Review Process.Perspectives of IRB chairs on the informed consent process.

P2860

Q35827296-23E04502-E273-48A1-9C2D-C1764ABD842D Q47613168-93BC00BC-C443-4EB5-BB96-2DAA1CFA61DD

P2860

More than cheating: deception, IRB shopping, and the normative legitimacy of IRBs.

Item

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q48323641

description

2012 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2012年の論文

@ja

2012年学术文章

@wuu

2012年学术文章

@zh

2012年学术文章

@zh-cn

2012年学术文章

@zh-hans

2012年学术文章

@zh-my

2012年学术文章

@zh-sg

2012年學術文章

@yue

2012年學術文章

@zh-hant

name

More than cheating: deception, IRB shopping, and the normative legitimacy of IRBs.

@en

More than cheating: deception, IRB shopping, and the normative legitimacy of IRBs.

@nl

type

Item

label

More than cheating: deception, IRB shopping, and the normative legitimacy of IRBs.

@en

More than cheating: deception, IRB shopping, and the normative legitimacy of IRBs.

@nl

prefLabel

More than cheating: deception, IRB shopping, and the normative legitimacy of IRBs.

@en

More than cheating: deception, IRB shopping, and the normative legitimacy of IRBs.

@nl

P1476

More than cheating: deception, IRB shopping, and the normative legitimacy of IRBs.

@en

P2093

Ryan Spellecy

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Thomas May

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Strangers at the benchside: research ethics consultation

The role of institutional support in protecting human research subjects.

Impact of institutional review board practice variation on observational health services research

A systematic review of the empirical literature evaluating IRBs: what we know and what we still need to learn

How do institutional review boards apply the federal risk and benefit standards for pediatric research?

To IRB or not to IRB?

Viewpoint: IRBs, hospital ethics committees, and the need for "translational informed consent".

Researchers break the rules in frustration at review boards.

The dysregulation of human subjects research.

Coexisting commitments to ethics and human research: a preliminary study of the perspectives of 83 medical students.

P304

990-996

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1111/J.1748-720X.2012.00726.X

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

2012-01-01T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P698

23289700

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

More than cheating: deception, IRB shopping, and the normative legitimacy of IRBs.

about

P2860

P2860

More than cheating: deception, IRB shopping, and the normative legitimacy of IRBs.

description

name

type

label

prefLabel

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P304

P31

P356

P433

P478

P577

P698

P356

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P304

P31

P356

P433

P478

P577

P698