Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper.
about
Comparison of apical and coronal extrusions using reciprocating and rotary instrumentation systems.Micro-computed tomography and scanning electron microscopy comparisons of two nickel-titanium rotary root canal instruments used with reciprocating motion.Geometric analysis of root canals prepared by single twisted file in three different operation modes.Metallurgical analysis and fatigue resistance of WaveOne and ProTaper nickel-titanium instruments.Evaluation of apical extrusion of debris and irrigant using two new reciprocating and one continuous rotation single file systemsEffect of reciprocating file motion on microcrack formation in root canals: an SEM study.Deformation and fracture incidence of Reciproc instruments: a clinical evaluation.Wear and metallographic analysis of WaveOne and reciproc NiTi instruments before and after three uses in root canals.Histological evaluation of the cleaning effectiveness of two reciprocating single-file systems in severely curved root canals: Reciproc versus WaveOne.Shaping ability of ProTaper Universal, WaveOne and ProTaper Next in simulated L-shaped and S-shaped root canals.Root canal retreatment using reciprocating and continuous rotary nickel-titanium instruments.Scanning Electron Microscopic Evaluation of Residual Smear Layer Following Preparation of Curved Root Canals Using Hand Instrumentation or Two Engine-Driven SystemsA Comparative Study of Shaping Ability of four Rotary Systems.A comparison of the shaping ability of three nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a micro-computed tomography study via a contrast radiopaque technique in vitro.Canal cleanliness using different irrigation activation systems: a SEM evaluation.Centering Ability and Influence of Experience When Using WaveOne Single-File Technique in Simulated CanalsCleaning efficacy of reciprocal and rotary systems in the removal of root canal filling materialReciproc vs. hand instrumentation in dental practice: a study in routine care.The impact of clinical use on the torsional behavior of Reciproc and WaveOne instrumentsMultiple-file vs. single-file endodontics in dental practice: a study in routine care.Shaping the root canal system.A review of instrumentation kinematics of engine-driven nickel-titanium instruments.A Comparison of Apical Transportation in Severely Curved Canals Induced by Reciproc and BioRaCe SystemsAn In vitro Comparison of Apically Extruded Debris Using Reciproc, ProTaper Universal, Neolix and Hyflex in Curved Canals.Influence of motion pattern on apical transportation and centering ability of WaveOne single-file technique in curved root canalsComparison of the shaping characteristics of Neolix and Protaper Universal systems in preparation of severely-curved simulated canals.Counterclockwise or clockwise reciprocating motion for oval root canal preparation: a micro-CT analysis.Root Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instruments in Mandibular Premolars Assessed Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.Comparison of Apical Extrusion of Debris by Using Single-File, Full-Sequence Rotary and Reciprocating Systems.Cleaning Effectiveness of a Reciprocating Single-file and a Conventional Rotary Instrumentation System.In vitro Comparison of Apical Debris Extrusion Using Rotary and Reciprocating Systems in Severely Curved Root Canals.Comparative evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal preparation using ProTaper™, Hyflex™ and Waveone™ rotary systems.Apical transportation and canal straightening with different continuously tapered rotary file systems in severely curved root canals: F6 SkyTaper and OneShape versus Mtwo.Laboratory comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of WaveOne Gold, Reciproc and WaveOne files in canals with a double curvature.Root filling bond strength using reciprocating file-matched single-cones with different sealers.Quantitative transportation assessment in curved canals prepared with an off-centered rectangular design system.In vitro investigation of the cleaning efficacy, shaping ability, preparation time and file deformation of continuous rotary, reciprocating rotary and manual instrumentations in primary molars.Micro-CT Evaluation of Non-instrumented Canal Areas with Different Enlargements Performed by NiTi Systems.Influence of the glide path on various parameters of root canal prepared with WaveOne reciprocating file using cone beam computed tomography.Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of WaveOne, Reciproc and OneShape single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
P2860
Q30405123-88C9F88B-46C2-431C-8A03-34559252C6CFQ34352103-EADC60C2-BA33-4745-85B1-313B0859C619Q34617690-FF2D9588-3666-4026-811A-4B440652B0E4Q34659916-B4AFC5F7-1D32-4E14-8837-BDB48809C8CBQ34914738-58554D72-C95D-44BC-9544-99736BAD1B2FQ35012600-AB99FBAF-CFA0-44C1-B591-F563DEB31483Q35154538-48CA470A-1053-49A0-BA37-26154780B7C7Q35209609-957BE105-517F-4A1B-BAEC-D608D242E2B8Q35567352-450BCAF3-64B4-49F5-AD3B-B608D96314BEQ35607035-760CBE00-67A2-4B24-8D25-42400EAC4C54Q35650719-BB599B0E-570E-4F20-9197-C132608300D1Q35828962-FD4D722A-4E71-453D-9A14-6A8587B5222FQ36149468-455F24FA-7674-40E0-B14C-94681C26B780Q36244725-EE62BE78-9D53-4D51-9FBE-48CB7A937669Q36276315-2394D6C5-CBCD-49AA-883C-B8ACDE46CDEBQ36344064-E21DC76D-D0AD-4572-9134-79ACD5742706Q36750024-6A9BBA0E-EF0B-46D4-8BD1-DBE23BA5733EQ37055252-1E088B14-8B1A-405C-88DA-FC671E4347CCQ37187633-CE9E3836-0F45-4E8B-B70E-28BD6C2A5DD3Q37488395-6DBDC570-3DE1-4E97-9D07-1A1A71CA37BDQ38197865-1997B087-7DB0-4418-9132-CB2333E300AEQ38335886-AEFC50FD-6EE3-4E1A-81E9-2ACE40A473C7Q38381958-0EAF0D9B-7A28-4ACF-9E5D-F1E2F42487C0Q38624835-B1656C6E-5E61-4C39-BF89-40896B18B860Q38670597-C220C80A-E810-486F-A29F-0BAC664A0A80Q38806018-9BE08E66-3394-47FE-A2BB-77DE97CA42E2Q38856128-EED121B6-55C2-4195-8A1F-E6C1073D7CF5Q38868133-02178975-1BF2-4B46-B62D-53EB39BC73EAQ38938441-10024004-FB45-4401-8C46-660748B53009Q38952492-0A7AFAC6-92CF-4A56-8763-9F6048C6668CQ38970900-3D5B3AB3-008C-4F66-A103-5378B3E978C9Q38992439-D82C9099-C1F2-48AE-A5CC-EA8F2F0B666FQ39220775-1DAADB46-011B-4E16-A65B-F9396191FE64Q39655378-3ABA3FDF-E2BA-4460-9FD6-6E78F945B6A8Q39737472-07E72808-69BA-41B1-A957-9FACE0047009Q39757095-F6234126-D1AE-4D35-B1A8-00DE744CA42BQ39840531-4E76EB91-2087-4642-B68C-AFCE2DCB20FBQ39932131-7433DAE2-3EF9-4C3A-B782-EC589DD3371BQ40115372-CDCDA09E-8413-48A3-A4F5-79F84348594AQ40180408-E9DC07AD-B0AB-40B3-9BBE-89C5A84D4893
P2860
Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper.
description
2011 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2011年の論文
@ja
2011年学术文章
@wuu
2011年学术文章
@zh
2011年学术文章
@zh-cn
2011年学术文章
@zh-hans
2011年学术文章
@zh-my
2011年学术文章
@zh-sg
2011年學術文章
@yue
2011年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Shaping ability and cleaning e ...... eOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper.
@en
Shaping ability and cleaning e ...... eOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper.
@nl
type
label
Shaping ability and cleaning e ...... eOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper.
@en
Shaping ability and cleaning e ...... eOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper.
@nl
prefLabel
Shaping ability and cleaning e ...... eOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper.
@en
Shaping ability and cleaning e ...... eOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P1476
Shaping ability and cleaning e ...... eOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper.
@en
P2093
K Hinschitza
S Bürklein
T Dammaschke
P2860
P304
P356
10.1111/J.1365-2591.2011.01996.X
P577
2011-12-22T00:00:00Z