about
Interventions to reduce suicides at suicide hotspots: a systematic reviewStrategic analysis of tuberculosis prevention and control actions in Brazil and Ethiopia: one size fits all?A comparative analysis of centralized waiting lists for patients without a primary care provider implemented in six Canadian provinces: study protocol.A process-based framework to guide nurse practitioners integration into primary healthcare teams: results from a logic analysis.An analysis of the adaptability of a professional development program in public health: results from the ALPS StudyDeveloping and Optimising the Use of Logic Models in Systematic Reviews: Exploring Practice and Good Practice in the Use of Programme Theory in ReviewsIntegrated Primary Care Teams (IPCT) pilot project in Quebec: a protocol paperOutcome mapping for health system integrationLOGIC ANALYSIS: TESTING PROGRAM THEORY TO BETTER EVALUATE COMPLEX INTERVENTIONSInvesting in a healthy lifestyle strategy: is it worth it?Whole Medical Systems versus the System of Conventional Biomedicine: A Critical, Narrative Review of Similarities, Differences, and Factors That Promote the Integration Process.Training mental health promotion workers in programme evaluation.Analytical typology of multiprofessional primary care models.Food rescue – an Australian exampleEffectiveness of the settings-based intervention Shaping the Social on preventing dropout from vocational education: a Danish non-randomized controlled trial
P2860
Q21257271-1DBAD695-A459-4359-9936-93AE5D74E025Q30240013-092858D6-9983-47D0-ADDF-6553146EDDC1Q30835730-B668FE29-49D2-46D8-90B6-93B1A95BE209Q35608792-274B061E-4ADD-48F0-8DE5-82A5171A4BD4Q35662946-4F1E79C3-9732-4CEB-801D-3EF0C4915D5FQ35843493-9D1158D1-3336-471A-8C7E-3082121E4361Q36405949-F818F654-BA5B-4DEE-AF6E-FC7DDD4FF257Q36702057-AE17145F-D18C-41B7-B8A4-E737B14A7013Q36940401-C636CF10-1C97-4C71-B486-A738377C4FF5Q37620150-3FF7296D-E1B6-4F6A-B45A-E3440E7F9DEFQ38369115-34E59CFE-2C38-4151-B477-FBD94BBC5E07Q48578127-18FD6C29-7D0D-4FEF-B3C6-58E296F25350Q52604158-3DA967A6-2AD4-4EDA-A115-D87DC86E1DC4Q58239780-AB8CD9A3-6391-4BF1-A70A-8DDE6AD4AAD9Q58748316-5C9085AD-D22D-44C5-8C3D-BB968B272F34
P2860
description
2010 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2010年の論文
@ja
2010年学术文章
@wuu
2010年学术文章
@zh
2010年学术文章
@zh-cn
2010年学术文章
@zh-hans
2010年学术文章
@zh-my
2010年学术文章
@zh-sg
2010年學術文章
@yue
2010年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Program theory evaluation: Logic analysis.
@en
Program theory evaluation: Logic analysis.
@nl
type
label
Program theory evaluation: Logic analysis.
@en
Program theory evaluation: Logic analysis.
@nl
prefLabel
Program theory evaluation: Logic analysis.
@en
Program theory evaluation: Logic analysis.
@nl
P1476
Program theory evaluation: Logic analysis.
@en
P2093
Astrid Brousselle
François Champagne
P356
10.1016/J.EVALPROGPLAN.2010.04.001
P577
2010-06-11T00:00:00Z