Reaching to ipsilateral or contralateral targets: within-hemisphere visuomotor processing cannot explain hemispatial differences in motor control.
about
Inter-limb interference during bimanual adaptation to dynamic environments.The impact of head direction on lateralized choices of target and handContralesional Arm Preference Depends on Hemisphere of Damage and Target Location in Unilateral Stroke PatientsFrom the reaching behavior at 5 months of age to hand preference at preschool ageHemispheric differences in the control of limb dynamics: a link between arm performance asymmetries and arm selection patternsSensorimotor performance asymmetries predict hand selectionDifferent strategy of hand choice after learning of constant and incremental dynamical perturbation in arm reaching.Multiple Coordinate Systems and Motor Strategies for Reaching Movements When Eye and Hand Are Dissociated in Depth and DirectionAre there right hemisphere contributions to visually-guided movement? Manipulating left hand reaction time advantages in dextrals."Left neglected," but only in far space: spatial biases in healthy participants revealed in a visually guided grasping task.Modulation of manual preference induced by lateralized practice diffuses over distinct motor tasks: age-related effects.Visual Online Control of Goal-Directed Aiming Movements in Children.Feedforward compensation for novel dynamics depends on force field orientation but is similar for the left and right arms.Hemifield or hemispace: what accounts for the ipsilateral advantages in visually guided aiming?Dominant vs. nondominant arm advantage in mentally simulated actions in right handers.State-Based Delay Representation and Its Transfer from a Game of Pong to Reaching and Tracking.Do left hand reaction time advantages depend on localising unpredictable targets?Eye-hand coordination during visuomotor adaptation: effects of hemispace and joint coordination.Antisaccades exhibit diminished online control relative to prosaccades.Coding valence in touchscreen interactions: hand dominance and lateral movement influence valence appraisals of emotional pictures.Antipointing: perception-based visual information renders an offline mode of control.Electroencephalographic evidence of vector inversion in antipointing.Non-obstructing 3D depth cues influence reach-to-grasp kinematics.An investigation into manual asymmetries in grasp behavior and kinematics during an object manipulation task.Amplification and diffusion of manual preference from lateralized practice in children.The antipointing task: vector inversion is supported by a perceptual estimate of visual space.Bias and sensitivity of proprioception of a passively felt hand path with and without a secondary task.Modulating Children's Manual Preference Through Spontaneous Nondominant Hand Use.Evaluation of the Leap Motion Controller during the performance of visually-guided upper limb movements.Rightward biases during bimanual reachingThe Role of Right Temporal Lobe Structures in Off-line Action: Evidence from Lesion-Behavior Mapping in Stroke Patients
P2860
Q30406610-7243BE8B-E460-4B93-8827-93116E46C9CEQ33732540-324F6287-D42D-4A7D-8EDC-3DD95249C94CQ34028707-A760093A-0BC9-4B70-86DD-EDAC6A2D92D5Q36193469-29DE4DB5-26BC-470E-90C7-CE57D85655BBQ36595509-BA1D45A6-6B8D-48D6-AF12-7973FA6B907CQ37023187-487CE0CB-BE69-4787-AC6F-040A1A3F34E5Q37598997-8DC0F9E8-E161-458D-AB25-F40D01F67BD1Q38687458-7C8B8AF5-57B8-4003-A759-847611CE3DA2Q41815851-4F2A23B5-A45E-43A4-857A-814A6131B7BAQ41884670-173C782A-0091-4841-8C7C-7BF770C38FFBQ41900676-D57D7984-6595-4EC5-BEAB-135E4E78A768Q42121955-28BE110F-04C3-448B-8A04-FF004D465ADEQ42738278-BC90445A-1B00-46CB-ABCC-898211A0F00DQ44968239-1BF03D48-A426-4145-AB33-65ED54699ECFQ45714350-F0A77ACB-8622-41A7-A1A1-43C97E73274AQ47832932-454124C8-1581-4AB3-B044-008FF4BF8620Q48101356-AF8A8583-8FE7-4D55-8429-FCD7F29F36F5Q48115680-2DF42371-710E-4935-A757-5234A12C4F2DQ48190371-A0053A58-4FEE-494F-B59A-955A8DC12E88Q48250786-95229D5C-9BF4-4892-8101-A461FB3144AAQ48378196-AD886E82-C289-421E-B1DD-0112E39FE48AQ48468717-BB78B44B-DB5B-419E-AF8E-661AB93BD175Q48486661-2F5435D3-9187-46C1-B3D7-3A9A6670615CQ48884031-442F4C6A-06DA-497A-AEBA-F0895CD614A7Q51894604-063D6B0B-91C1-4E10-9DBB-16D887A4C26CQ51934197-9159DC74-E27C-49BB-ACB4-0ECC83576D7FQ52641020-A0D679F0-1E20-4792-9C44-41B481C11D50Q53251386-8520ADDF-5C9A-42D1-B856-DFDA5FFA9129Q55438127-C042C753-199A-43CA-B70D-9E7689FD272DQ57920688-958C611E-A79B-4319-8E12-06736309EC25Q59118460-DF6C0AFC-6CDF-44FB-A1D3-3AD57BA24E43
P2860
Reaching to ipsilateral or contralateral targets: within-hemisphere visuomotor processing cannot explain hemispatial differences in motor control.
description
1996 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
1996年の論文
@ja
1996年学术文章
@wuu
1996年学术文章
@zh
1996年学术文章
@zh-cn
1996年学术文章
@zh-hans
1996年学术文章
@zh-my
1996年学术文章
@zh-sg
1996年學術文章
@yue
1996年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Reaching to ipsilateral or con ...... differences in motor control.
@en
Reaching to ipsilateral or con ...... differences in motor control.
@nl
type
label
Reaching to ipsilateral or con ...... differences in motor control.
@en
Reaching to ipsilateral or con ...... differences in motor control.
@nl
prefLabel
Reaching to ipsilateral or con ...... differences in motor control.
@en
Reaching to ipsilateral or con ...... differences in motor control.
@nl
P2093
P356
P1476
Reaching to ipsilateral or con ...... differences in motor control.
@en
P2093
E L Hargreaves
M A Goodale
P2888
P304
P356
10.1007/BF00227955
P577
1996-12-01T00:00:00Z