Assessing the economic advantage of laparoscopic vs. open approaches for colorectal cancer by a propensity score matching analysis.

about

Propensity score matching comparison of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer in a middle-income country: short-term outcomes and cost analysis

P2860

Q58746908-88F6E484-84E4-45AF-A1E4-8236A7EBF1B7

P2860

Assessing the economic advantage of laparoscopic vs. open approaches for colorectal cancer by a propensity score matching analysis.

Item

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q50129783

description

2017 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2017年の論文

@ja

2017年学术文章

@wuu

2017年学术文章

@zh

2017年学术文章

@zh-cn

2017年学术文章

@zh-hans

2017年学术文章

@zh-my

2017年学术文章

@zh-sg

2017年學術文章

@yue

2017年學術文章

@zh-hant

name

Assessing the economic advanta ...... nsity score matching analysis.

@en

Assessing the economic advanta ...... nsity score matching analysis.

@nl

type

Item

label

Assessing the economic advanta ...... nsity score matching analysis.

@en

Assessing the economic advanta ...... nsity score matching analysis.

@nl

prefLabel

Assessing the economic advanta ...... nsity score matching analysis.

@en

Assessing the economic advanta ...... nsity score matching analysis.

@nl

P1476

Assessing the economic advanta ...... nsity score matching analysis.

@en

P2093

Hideyuki Tanaka

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Hiromitsu Hayashi

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Hiroshi Takamori

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Katsuhiro Ogawa

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Kenichi Ogata

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Koichi Doi

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Nobuyuki Ozaki

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Yoshiaki Ikuta

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

The surgical stress response and postoperative immune function after laparoscopic or conventional total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer: a randomized trial

Global cancer statistics, 2012

Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey

Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial.

Is minimally invasive colon resection better than traditional approaches?: First comprehensive national examination with propensity score matching.

Laparoscopic and open resection for colorectal cancer: an evaluation of cellular immunity.

Comparison of the clinical and economic outcomes between open and minimally invasive appendectomy and colectomy: evidence from a large commercial payer database

In-hospital delay of elective surgery for high volume procedures: the impact on infectious complications.

Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial.

Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial.

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1007/S00595-017-1606-7

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

2017-11-07T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P698

29110090

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P921

colorectal cancer

Assessing the economic advantage of laparoscopic vs. open approaches for colorectal cancer by a propensity score matching analysis.

about

P2860

P2860

Assessing the economic advantage of laparoscopic vs. open approaches for colorectal cancer by a propensity score matching analysis.

description

name

type

label

prefLabel

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P31

P356

P577

P698

P921

P356

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P31

P356

P577

P698

P921