A comparison of the quality of life of hearing-impaired people as estimated by three different utility measures.
about
EQ-5D in skin conditions: an assessment of validity and responsivenessQuality of life after intervention with a cochlear implant or hearing aidAge-dependent cost-utility of pediatric cochlear implantationTen-year health-related quality of life in cochlear implant recipients: prospective SF-36 data with SF-6D conversion.Health-related quality of life and hearing aids: a tutorial.Measuring preferences for cost-utility analysis: how choice of method may influence decision-makingHealth state utility values in patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery.Choosing between measures: comparison of EQ-5D, HUI2 and HUI3 in persons with hearing complaints.A longitudinal comparison of 5 preference-weighted health state classification systems in persons with intervertebral disk herniation.Do estimates of cost-utility based on the EQ-5D differ from those based on the mapping of utility scores?Comparison of SF-6D and EQ-5D Scores in Patients With Breast Cancer.An assessment of validity and responsiveness of generic measures of health-related quality of life in hearing impairment.QALY weights for neurosensory impairments in pediatric economic evaluations: case studies and a critique.Systematic review and empirical comparison of contemporaneous EQ-5D and SF-6D group mean scores.Quality of life measures in otitis media.Paediatric cochlear implantation: the views of parents.Quality of life in cochlear implantees: comparing utility values obtained through the Medical Outcome Study Short-Form Survey-6D and the Health Utility Index Mark 3.Differences in perception of hearing handicap between cochlear implant users and their spouses.
P2860
Q27011276-C6932358-9036-4CB2-B06D-239209754E65Q28384318-3722C4DB-1FE6-4B15-9F67-8D2B2C5999D6Q30435623-63168721-1140-44BB-BD67-4E6FEB994BEBQ30677047-B0080E75-D20C-477C-9737-2642B7D4E543Q33952294-1D0FA02B-F76F-46D1-9B1F-1ABBCBCC0B95Q34614168-06E63744-1FD4-4948-8E8C-8F027D8E83D7Q35596345-332CCE61-08ED-4F52-B66F-642A3435EF2FQ36087642-579716DD-56DC-4B80-878E-F64C33B6A3F1Q36503744-1F174EBA-0086-4C05-BBBF-1465B960F3BEQ36798538-14E9A3B6-D3F8-4ED9-893C-9A8DC05136E4Q37080811-872637F4-AD72-443B-BE82-4D2B9FD05C57Q37369035-4216F67A-C440-48ED-8119-23F942F63F6EQ37764874-0B67062B-9EF6-4E26-9B50-364CA3B1E5C6Q37945042-342C6A86-9DD2-44CE-B2EF-185E76EB5830Q38097543-CE497915-0C41-4E15-A396-B63C3A682393Q42666478-98AB22BD-7728-4F43-9EC0-2BC153836D29Q48085550-099A5E1B-D1D0-4E7B-A228-B2D87088A649Q48154319-0B7D8222-ABDE-42AB-A55A-B83814B23DF5
P2860
A comparison of the quality of life of hearing-impaired people as estimated by three different utility measures.
description
2005 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2005年の論文
@ja
2005年学术文章
@wuu
2005年学术文章
@zh
2005年学术文章
@zh-cn
2005年学术文章
@zh-hans
2005年学术文章
@zh-my
2005年学术文章
@zh-sg
2005年學術文章
@yue
2005年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
A comparison of the quality of ...... ee different utility measures.
@en
A comparison of the quality of ...... ee different utility measures.
@nl
type
label
A comparison of the quality of ...... ee different utility measures.
@en
A comparison of the quality of ...... ee different utility measures.
@nl
prefLabel
A comparison of the quality of ...... ee different utility measures.
@en
A comparison of the quality of ...... ee different utility measures.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P1476
A comparison of the quality of ...... ee different utility measures.
@en
P2093
Adrian C Davis
Garry R Barton
John Bankart
P2860
P304
P356
10.1080/14992020500057566
P577
2005-03-01T00:00:00Z